Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 07055
Number of page(s) 10
Section Regions and Economic Resilience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219207055
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Pires de Carvalho Oliveira Silva, C. S., Freire Seoane, M. J., & Lopez-Bermudez, B. (2019). Un Analisis de la Formacion Terciaria entre los Trabajadores Dependientes e Independientes: El Caso de Portugal (2006-2016). Archivos analíticos de políticas educativas. Revista académica evaluada por pares, independiente, de acceso abierto y multilingüe, 27(46), 2-19. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barclay, K.J. (2018). The birth order paradox: sibling differences in educational attainment. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 54, 56-65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burlacu, S., Enache, A.C., & Stefan, C. (2013). INcreator-innovative software tool for creation of adaptive education digital content. In The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education. „Carol I” National Defence University, 2, 238. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barg, K. (2019). Why are middle-class parents more involved in school than working-class parents? Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 59, 14–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chari, D., & Potvin, G. (2019). Understanding the importance of graduate admissions criteria according to prospective graduate students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 023101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burlacu, S. (2011). Characteristics of knowledge-based economy and new technologies in education. Administratie si Management Public, (16), 114-119. [Google Scholar]
  7. de Souza, E. S., Serafim, M. C., & Santos, L. S. (2019). A contribuição do ensino de ética no desenvolvimento da competência moral de discentes em administração pública. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas= Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(1), 66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gonzalez-Morales, O., Santana-Vega, L.E. (2020). Diseño de un plan de acción para la empleabilidad de los universitarios. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 28(88), 2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Androniceanu, A., & Burlacu, S. (2017). Intelligent system for assessment and grading based on docimologic tests. eLearning & Software for Education, 2, 33-40. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gargallo Lopez, B., Perez-Perez, C., Garcia-Garcia, F.J., Gimenez Beut, J.A., Portillo Poblador, N. (2020). The skill of learning to learn at university. Proposal for a theoretical model. Educacion XX1, 23(1), 19-44. [Google Scholar]
  11. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2018. Global Education Monitoring Report 2019: Migration, Displacement and Education – Building Bridges, not Walls. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265866 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burlacu, S., Rădulescu, C. V., & BĂLU, O. F. (2018). Forms of Electronic Training. Principles of Educational Games. In Proceedings of the International Conference On Economics and Social Sciences, 1, 36-41. [Google Scholar]
  13. Barthelemy, R.S., McCormick, M., Henderson, C.R., Knaub, A. (2020). Educational supports and career goals of five women in a graduate astronomy program. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pereira Gonzalez, M., Martis Florez, R., Pascual Diez, J. (2019). Evaluation of career guidance and career education needs in six University Degrees on Education. Bases for the development of the Tutorial Action Plan. Educación XX1, 22(2), 309-334. [Google Scholar]
  15. Burlacu, S., & Grosu, O. (2009). E-learning through remote laboratories: a new research tool for education assistance. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition, (1), 88-90. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mota, A.R., Körhasan, N.D., Miller, K., Mazur, E. (2019). Homework as a metacognitive tool in an undergraduate physics course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gale, T., Parker, S. (2017). Retaining students in Australian higher education: cultural capital, field distinction. European Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 80–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Burlacu, S., & Jiroveanu, D.C. (2009). IT Governance and Educational Ideal. Administrație și Management Public, 13, 73-82. [Google Scholar]
  19. Andrew, M., Taylorson, J., Langille, D.J., Grange, A., Williams, N. (2018). Student attitudes towards technology and their preferences for learning tools/devices at two universities in the UAE. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 309-344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Formanek, M., Buxner, S., Impey, C., Wenger, M. (2019). Relationship between learners’ motivation and course engagement in an astronomy massive open online course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. European Commission (2019). Reflection Paper – Towards a Sustainable Europe by 2030. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/reflection-paper-towards-sustainable-europe-2030_en. [Google Scholar]
  22. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2019). Trends Shaping Education 2019, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/trends-shaping-education-2019_trends_edu-2019-en [Google Scholar]
  23. Romanian National Institute of Statistics, (2020). Retrieved from: www.insse.ro [Google Scholar]
  24. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (2018). From long-term unemployment to a matching job: the role of vocational training in sustainable return to work. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Retrieved from: https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/3076_en.pdf [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.