Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 95, 2021
The 3rd International Conference on Resources Economics and Bioeconomy in Competitive Societies (RebCos’20) under the title Environmental Challenges, Innovative Technologies and Rural Areas in Digital Era
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 03 February 2021
  1. Nábrádi, A. (2007). The economic value of grassland products. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 1(1), 19–28. [Google Scholar]
  2. O’Mara, F.P. (2012) The role of grasslands in food security and climate change. Annals of Botany, 110(6), 1263–70. [Google Scholar]
  3. Peeters, A. (2008). Challenges for grasslands, grassland-based systems and their production potential in Europe. Grassland science in Europe, 13(August), 9–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Plantureux, S., Peeters, A., Mc Cracken, D. (2005). Biodiversity in intensive grasslands: Effect of management, improvement and challenges. Agronomy research, 3(2), 153–164; [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibon, A. (2005). Managing grassland for production, the environment and the landscape. Challenges at the farm and the landscape level. Livestock Production Science, 96(1), 11–31. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arsić, S., Jovanović, M., Sredojević, Z. (2015). Comparative analysis of the number of sheep in FYR and some European countries. Economics of Agriculture, 62(2), 453–466. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farinella, D., Nori, M., Ragkos, A. (2017). Changes in Euro-Mediterranean pastoralism: which opportunities for rural development and generational renewal? Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation, Alghero, Italy, 7–10 May 2017, 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  8. Besnard, A.G., Secondi, J. (2014). Hedgerows diminish the value of meadows for grassland birds: Potential conflicts for agri-environment schemes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 189(May), 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  9. Britschgi, A., Spaar, R., Arlettaz, R. (2006). Impact of grassland farming intensification on the breeding ecology of an indicator insectivorous passerine, the Whinchat Saxicola rubetra: Lessons for overall Alpine meadowland management. Biological Conservation, 130(2),193–205. [Google Scholar]
  10. Teague, W.R., Apfelbaum, S., Lal, R., Kreuter, U.P., Rowntree, J., Davies, C.A, Conser, R., Rasmussen, A.M., Hatfield, J., Wang, T. (2016). The role of ruminants in reducing agriculture’s carbon footprint in North America. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 71(2), 156–64. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zheng, X., Zhang, J., Cao, S. (2018). Net value of grassland ecosystem services in mainland China. Land Use Policy, 79 (Decembar 2018), 94–101. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chapman, D.F., Parsons, A.J., Cosgrove, G.P., Barker, D.J., Marotti, D.M., Venning, K.J., Rutter, S.M., Hill, J., Thompson, A.N. (2007). Impacts of spatial patterns in pasture on animal grazing behavior, intake, and performance. Crop Science, 47, 399–416. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tälle, M., Deák, B., Poschlod, P., Valkó, O., Westerberg, L., Milberg, P. (2016). Grazing vs. mowing: A meta-analysis of biodiversity benefits for grassland management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 222, 200–212. [Google Scholar]
  14. Laterra, P., Agrarias, C. (2011). From multifunctional grasslands to multifunctional landscapes. IX International Rangeland Congress, Volume: Proceedings I, Rosario, Argentina, 2011, 709–713. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wehn, S., Hovstad, K.A., Johansen, L. (2017). The effect of landscape structure on biodiversity in semi-natural grasslands of high nature value. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation Alghero, Italy 7–10 May 2017, 277–279. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, M., Wu, J.J., Deng, X. (2013). Identifying drivers of land use change in China: A spatial multinomial logit model analysis. Land Economics, 89(4), 632–654. [Google Scholar]
  17. Eriksson, O., Cousins, S.A.O., Bruun, H.H. (2002). Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3(5), 743–748. [Google Scholar]
  18. Le, C., Ikazaki, K., Siriguleng, S., Kadono, A., Kosaki, T. (2013). Grassland degradation caused by tourism activities in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia, China. 8th International Symposium of the Digital Earth (ISDE8), 26–29 August 2013, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, OP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science18(2014) 012137. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barkmann, J., Zschiegner, A.K. (2010). Grasslands as a sustainable tourism resource in Germany: Environmental knowledge effects on resource conservation preferences. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 13(3–4), 174–191. [Google Scholar]
  20. Van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A., Hennessy, D., Isselstein, J. (2020). Grazing of dairy cows in europe-an in-depth analysis based on the perception of grassland experts. Sustainability, 2(3), 1098. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacquot, A.L., Brunschwig, G., Delaby, L., Pomies, D., Lamadon, A., Baumont, R. (2017). Dynamilk: a model at farm-scale to explore the balance between forage and milk production. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation Alghero, Italy 7–10 May 2017, 85–87. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lessire, F., Scohier, C., Dufrasne, I. (2017). Impact of grazing practices on farm self-sufficiency, milk and economic performances of three automatized farms. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation Alghero, Italy 7–10 May 2017, 182–184. [Google Scholar]
  23. Osoro, K., Ferreira, L.M.M., García, U., Martínez, A., Celaya, R. (2017). Performance of two herd types: suckler cows vs sheep-plus-goats grazing on partially improved heathlands. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation Alghero, Italy 7–10 May 2017, 206–208. [Google Scholar]
  24. Goliński, P., Golińska, B., Paszkowski, A. (2017). Effectiveness of heifers grazing on extensive grassland situated in the B. Papi Reserve. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation Alghero, Italy 7–10 May 2017, 323–325. [Google Scholar]
  25. FAOSTAT (2020). Data. 2020. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  26. Kosovo Agency of Statistics (2019). Farm Structure Survey 2018. Available from:činstva-2018.pdf [Google Scholar]
  27. Sanderson, M., Wedin, A.D., Tracy, B. (2005). Grassland: Definition, Origins, Extent, and Future. In: Plant Production and Protection, Series No 34. FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  28. Velthof, G.L., Lesschen, J.P., Schils, R.L.M., Smit, A., Elbersen, B.S., Hazeu, G.W., Mucher, C.A., Oenema, O. (2014). Grassland areas, production and use. Alterra Wageningen UR, Wageningen (40701). [Google Scholar]
  29. Lesschen, J.P., Elbersen, B., Hazeu, G., Van Doorn, A., Mucher, S., Velthof, G. (2016). Task 1 - Defining and classifying grasslands in Europe. Alterra Wageningen UR, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
  30. FAOSTAT (2020). Land use. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  31. EUROSTAT (2020). Livestock unit coefficients. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  32. EUROSTAT (2019). Agri-environmental indicator - livestock patterns. Statistics Explained. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  33. European Union (2011). Agriculture and fishery statistics. Main results 2019–10. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  34. Miljković, D., Nikolić, M. (1996). Razvoj republika prethodne SFR Jugoslavije 1947-1990 godina/Development of the republics of the former SFR Yugoslavia 1947-1990/. Belgrade, Federal Birou of Statistics. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ziani, P. (1964). Problemi uzgoja koza u Jugoslaviji/Problems of goat breeding in Yugoslavia/. Šumarski glasnik, 88(7–8), 277–306. [Google Scholar]
  36. Peeters, A., Resources, N., Environment, H., Grasses, P. (2015). Environmental impacts and future challenges of grasslands and grassland- based livestock production systems in Europe Grassland. In book: Grasslands, A Global Resource Perspective, Edition: International Grassland Congress and Range Management Society of India, Chapter: 17, Lucknow (India), Army Printing Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.