Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 104, 2021
Second International Conference on History, Theory and Methodology of Learning (ICHTML 2021)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Learning Theories
Published online 04 May 2021
  1. Dell Technologies Research: 78% of Businesses Feel Threatened by Digital Start-ups (2020), [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Vorontsova, A. Arakelyan, V. Baranov, Wisdom 15, 68 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Ehl, Aspen Review (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Seidametova, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2104, 462 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Panchenko, I. Muzyka, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2547, 168 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Syvyi, O. Mazbayev, O. Varakuta, N. Panteleeva, O. Bondarenko, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2731, 369 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Vakaliuk, A. Yefimenko, V. Bolotina, Y. Bailiuk, O. Pokotylo, S. Didkivska, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2732, 665 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Almerich, N. Orellana, J. Suarez-Rodriguez, I. Diaz-Garcia, Computers & Education 100, 110 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Biswas, How can technology help in education? (2011), [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Costa, H. Alvelos, L. Teixeira, Procedia Technology 5, 334 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Piccarozzi, B. Aquilani, C. Gatti, Sustainability 10, 2 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. Systemic risk of modelling in insurance. did your model tell you all models are wrong? (2015), [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Bansal, F.M. Zahedi, D. Gefen, Information and Management 53, 1–21 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Menin, 5 emerging consulting professions for the new economy (2020), [Google Scholar]
  15. World Economic Forum, The future of jobs report 2020 (2020), [Google Scholar]
  16. McKinsey Global Institute, What’s next for remote work: An analysis of 2,000 tasks, 800 jobs, and nine countries (2020), [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Mckee, Language Testing in Asia 2, 45 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  18. O. Polishchuk, I. Vitiuk, N. Kovtun, V. Fed, Wisdom 15, 45 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. A.J. Abath, Principia 24, 419 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Eiter, W. Faber, N. Leone, G. Pfeifer, A. Polleres, Planning under Incomplete Knowledge, in Computational Logic — CL 2000, edited by J. Lloyd, V. Dahl, U. Furbach, M. Kerber, K.K. Lau, C. Palamidessi, L.M. Pereira, Y. Sagiv, P.J. Stuckey (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000), pp. 807–821, ISBN 978-3-540-44957-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Ferguson, M. Gardner, H. Hajishirzi, T. Khot, P. Dasigi, IIRC: A Dataset of Incomplete Information Reading Comprehension Questions, in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 2020), pp. 1137–1147, [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Gonçalves, P. Lima, Grasp Planning with Incomplete Knowledge About the Object to be Grasped, in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC) (2019), pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Rahnamayan, H.R. Tizhoosh, M.A. Salama, WSEAS Transactions on Systems 4, 1725 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Kirby, Reading comprehension: Its nature and development (2007), [Google Scholar]
  25. V.I. Sigov, S.A. Uvarov, N.N. Pokrovskaia, Neuro-fuzzy tools in studying social management, in 2017 IEEE II International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS) (2017), pp. 216–219 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M.Y. Ababkova, N.N. Pokrovskaia, I.R. Trostinskaya, The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) XXXV, 10 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Pokrovskaia, Y. Margulyan, A. Bulatetskaia, S. Snisarenko, Wisdom 14, 69-(2020) [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Volikova, T. Armash, Y. Yechkalo, V. Zaselskiy, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433, 486 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Vakaliuk, V. Kontsedailo, D. Antoniuk, O. Korotun, I. Mintii, A. Pikilnyak, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2547, 66 (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.