EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 108 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 108 (2021) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 108, 2021
IX Baltic Legal Forum “Law and Order in the Third Millennium” 2020
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Criminal Procedure and Forensic Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110804002
Published online 31 May 2021
  1. G. Michelini, M. Cadelli, Le juge d’instruction est inutile lorsque le parquet est indépendant: l’exemple italien, in La figure du juge d’instruction: réformer ou supprimer? 37-55 (Anthémis, Limal, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Kelker, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 118(2), 389-426 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1515/ZSTW.2006.013 [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Bittmann, Die Verständigung und die Rolle der Staatsanwaltschaft, in A. Sinn, C. Schößling (eds.), Praxishandbuch zur Verständigung im Strafverfahren, 19-126 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48976-5_2 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Heger, Staatsanwaltschaft, in R. Voigt (ed.), Handbuch Staat, 873-883 (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20744-1_79 [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Richardson, B.L. Kutateladze, J. Res. Crime Delinq. 58(1), 41-73 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820940739 [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Ricci, P. Pavone, Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 33(6/7), 713-729 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-04-2020-0102 [Google Scholar]
  7. N.V. Demleitner, Fed. Sentencing Report. 32(4), 187-194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2020.32.4.187 [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Gonzalez, Crim. Justice 34(3), 9-14 (2019). Accessed on: December 20, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/openview/eef0a26f19f99d58b0681ae82223873b/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=35991 [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Levine, Kay, Hastings J. Crime & Punish. 169 (2020), Emory Legal Studies Research Paper 20-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3601928 [Google Scholar]
  10. G.N. Korolev, Prokurorskoe ugolovnoe presledovanie v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [Prosecutor’s office criminal prosecution in the Russian criminal procedure] (Yurlitinform, Moscow, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  11. V.F. Kryukov, Prokuror v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: (istoriya i sovremennost) [Prosecutor in criminal proceedings in Russia: (history and modernity)] (Kursk, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  12. A.A. Tushev, Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Prosecutor in the criminal process of the Russian Federation] (Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, Saint Petersburg, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  13. V.S. Balakshin, Bulletin of the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 1, 5-9 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. S.M. Darovskikh, Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Law, 5, 124-127 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Roiphe, B.A. Green, Am. Univ. Law Rev. 69(3) (2020). Accessed on: March 16, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.aulawreview.org/a-fiduciary-theory-of-prosecution/ [Google Scholar]
  16. N.S. Manova, Obespechenie prav uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: dostoinstva i problemy deistvuyushchego zakonodatelstva [Ensuring the rights of participants in criminal proceedings: dignity and problems of current legislation], in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Prava cheloveka – vysshee dostizhenie sovremennoi tsivilizatsii” 27 noyabrya 2015 g., Krymskii yuridicheskii institut (filial) Akademii Generalnoi prokuratury RF [Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Human rights – the highest achievement of modern civilization”, November 27, 2015, Crimean Law Institute (branch) of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation (IT “ARIAL”, Simferopol, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Taleb, T. Ahlstrand, Revue internationale de droit penal, 82(3-4), 523-540 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.823.0523. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Arora, Too tough on crime? The impact of prosecutor politics on incarceration (American Economic Association, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Ouss, M.T. Stevenson, Bail, jail, and pretrial misconduct: The influence of prosecutors (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335138 [Google Scholar]
  20. The state of crime in Russia in January-June 2020, January-December 2019, JanuaryDecember 2018, Official website of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation. Accessed on: April 13, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://genproc.gov.ru/upload/iblock/4fb/sbornik_6_2020.pdf; https://genproc.gov.ru/upload/iblock/034/sbornik_12_2019.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. Analysis of the state of crime in the Saratov Region for the 1st half of 2020, Official website of the Saratov Region Prosecutor’s Office, Accessed on: April 13, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://epp.genproc.gov.ru/web/proc_64/massmedia/news?item=51758495 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.