Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 108, 2021
IX Baltic Legal Forum “Law and Order in the Third Millennium” 2020
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 4
Section Criminal Procedure and Forensic Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110804001
Published online 31 May 2021
  1. V.S. Zhelonkin, Vestnik of the Omsk Law Academy, 14(2), 98-103 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Ferrand, The French court of cassation: On the threshold of a quiet revolution?, in C. van Rhee, Y. Fu (eds.), Supreme Courts in Transition in China and the West. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol. 59, 175-206 (Springer, Cham, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52344-6_9 [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Brutaru, Influence of the constitutional court and high court of cassation and justice jurisprudence on extraordinary appeals (appeal in cassation). http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3614457 [Google Scholar]
  4. I.S. Dikarev, Nadzorno-kassatsionnaya forma peresmotra sudebnykh reshenii v ugolovnom protsesse: monografiya [Review Cassation Form of Revising Judgments in Criminal Process: Monograph] (Volga State University Publishing House, Volgograd, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. J.H. Dingfelder Stone, The right to a fair trial, in Court Interpreters and Fair Trials, 103-158 (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-753553_4 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ch.J. Hynes, Fordham Urban Law J. 20(3), 419-430 (1993). Accessed on: March 16, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol20/iss3/3 [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Gold LaGratta, Ph. Bowen, To be fair: procedural fairness in courts. Report (November 2014). Accessed on: March 16, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://justiceinnovation.org/publications/be-fair-procedural-fairness-courts [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Dyer, Monash University Law Review 19(1), 188-191 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  9. L.V. Golovko (ed.), Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa [Course of Criminal Procedure] (Statut, Moscow, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. A.R. Belkin, Criminal Judicial Proceeding, 3, 25-29 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. M.T. Ashirbekova, V.N. Troneva, Magistrate Judge, 10, 30-35 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. A.D. Proshlaykov, M.V. Merzlyakova, Issues of Law, 2, 158 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. I.S. Dikarev, Legality, 1, 47 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  14. M.T. Ashirbekova, Criminal Judicial Proceeding, 3, 9 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. M.A. Khokhryakov, Eurasian Union of Scientists, 12-4, 129 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. V.A. Vdovin, Russian Laws: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 1, 61-64 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. V.V. Kalnitsky, T.V. Kuryakhova, Criminal Law, 3, 110-115 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. A.R. Belkin, Criminal Judicial Proceeding 3, 32-47 (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.