Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 118, 2021
RUDN Conference on Legal Theory, Methodology and Regulatory Practice (RUDN LTMRP Conference 2021)
Article Number 02011
Number of page(s) 7
Section Socio-Cultural Approach in Legal Science
Published online 23 August 2021
  1. H. Kissinger, The Wall Street J. (2020). Accessed on: June 25, 2021. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO Manifesto for a healthy recovery from COVID-19. Accessed on: June 25, 2021. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  3. P.D. Tishchenko, Bio-vlast v epokhu biotekhnologii [Bio-Power in the Age of Biotechnology] (IFRAN, Moscow, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  4. D. McGhee, Building a Consensus on “National Security”: Terrorism, Human Rights and “Core Values”, in Security, Citizenship and Human Rights. Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Prezelj, Intern. Stud. Interdisc. Polit. and Cult. J. 17(1), 145–158 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. I.D. Yagofarova, Rus. Justice, 9, 45–47 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. O.A. Kolotkina, I.D. Yagofarova, Laws of Rus.: Exper., Analysis, Pract. 10, 94–97 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Ignatieff, Soc. Research 69(4), 1137–1158 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  9. M.D. Kielsgard, California Western Intern. Law J., 36(2), 249–302 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Sanders, Rev. Intern. Stud. 44(1), 2–23 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P.J. Esteves, J. Abrantes, H. Baldauf et al., Experim. & Molec. Med. 50, 1–10 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.L. Solerte, J. Gynecol. Research and Obstetrics 6(3), 67–71 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. R.C. Jones, Contemporary Justice Rev. 1–16 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Donaldson, W. Kymlicka, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights (Oxford UP, Oxford, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Howen, Speech, ICJ Secretary-General at the Biennial Conference 2004: Counter-terrorism and human rights, challenges and responses (2004). Accessed on: June 25, 2021. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  16. G.B. Romanovsky, Newslet. Perm Univ. Legal Sci. 37, 260–271 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. W.-H. Li, M.A. Saunders, Nature, 437, 50–51 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Hooley, Res Publica: J. Soc. and Legal Philos. 24(4), 509–530 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. D.B. Gorokhov, Yu.V. Gorokhova, Advokat, 11, 5–20 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Fukuyama, Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoi revolyutsii [Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnological Revolution] (Progress, Moscow, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Toffler, Shok budushchego [Shock of the future] (AST, Moscow, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Chemaly, What Do Artificial Wombs Mean for Women? Accessed on: June 25, 2021. [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  23. M.R. Sargentini, Corriere della Sera, 18 luglio (2008) [Google Scholar]
  24. R.A. Posner, Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency (Inalienable Rights) (Oxford University Press, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Segev, Israel Law Rev. 42(2), 234–247 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.