Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 119, 2021
3rd International Conference on Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Social Sciences (QQR’21)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Empirical Studies: Quantitative and Qualitative
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111901001
Published online 24 August 2021
  1. Clough, P., K. Earle, and D. Sewell, Mental toughness: The concept and its measurement. Solutions in sport psychology, 2002: p. 32–43. [Google Scholar]
  2. Schumacker, R.E. and R.G. Lomax, A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. 2004: Psychology press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Valette-Florence, P., Spécificités et apports des méthodes d’analyse multivariée de la deuxième génération. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition), 1988. 3(4): p. 23–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Evrard, Y., B. Pras, and E. Roux, Market: Études et recherches en marketing (3 e ed.). Paris: Dunod, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumgartner, H. and C. Homburg, Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International journal of Research in Marketing, 1996. 13(2): p. 139–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hulland, J., Y.H. Chow, and S. Lam, Use of causal models in marketing research: A review. International journal of research in marketing, 1996. 13(2): p. 181–197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Steenkamp, J.-B.E. and H. Baumgartner, On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling. International journal of research in marketing, 2000. 17(2-3): p. 195–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Russel, P., et al., Méthodes d’équations structurelles: recherches et application en gestion. Economica, Paris, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaplan, D., Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Vol. 10. 2008: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  10. Croutsche, J.-J., Étude des relations de causalité: Utilisation des modèles d’équations structurelles (approche méthodologique). La Revue des Sciences de Gestion: Direction et Gestion, 2002(198): p. 81. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoyle, R.H., Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. 1995: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hair, J.F., et al., Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006: p. 1–816. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chin, W.W., R.A. Peterson, and S.P. Brown, Structural equation modeling in marketing: Some practical reminders. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 2008. 16(4): p. 287–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chaput, L., Modèles contemporains en gestion: un nouveau paradigme, la performance. 2007: PUQ. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gucciardi, D.F., S. Hanton, and C.J. Mallett, Progressing measurement in mental toughness: A case example of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire 48. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2012. 1(3): p. 194. [Google Scholar]
  16. Clough, P., et al., Comment on “Progressing measurement in mental toughness: A case example of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire 48” by Gucciardi, Hanton, and Mallett (2012). 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Earle, K., The construct of mental toughness: A psychometric and experimental analysis. 2007, University of Hull. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kobasa, S.C., Stressful life events, personality, and health: an inquiry into hardiness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1979. 37(1): p. 1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Connaughton, D., et al., Mental toughness research: Key issues in this area. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2008. 39(3): p. 192–204. [Google Scholar]
  20. Crust, L., A review and conceptual re-examination of mental toughness: Implications for future researchers. Personality and individual differences, 2008. 45(7): p. 576–583. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harter, S., The perceived competence scale for children. Child development, 1982: p. 87–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Crust, L. and C. Swann, Comparing two measures of mental toughness. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011. 50(2): p. 217–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hu, L.T. and P.M. Bentler, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 1999. 6(1): p. 1–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kline, R.B., Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. 2011, na. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tucker, L.R. and C. Lewis, A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973. 38(1): p. 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Byrne, B.M., Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications series). New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 2010. 396: p. 7384. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jöreskog, K.G. and D. Sörbom, LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. 1996: Scientific Software International. [Google Scholar]
  28. Perry, J.L., et al., Factorial validity of the mental toughness questionnaire-48. Personality and individual differences, 2013. 54(5): p. 587–592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Golby, J. and M. Sheard, Mental toughness and hardiness at different levels ofrugby league. Personality and individual differences, 2004. 37(5): p. 933–942. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gerber, M., et al., Adolescents’ exercise and physical activity are associated with mental toughness. Mental health and physical activity, 2012. 5(1): p. 35–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Birch, P., et al., The Mental Toughness Questionniare-48: A Re-examination of Factorial Validity. International journal of sport psychology, 2016. 48. [Google Scholar]
  32. Perry, J.L., et al., Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Measurement in physical education and exercise science, 2015. 19(1): p. 12–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hopwood, C.J. and M.B. Donnellan, How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2010. 14(3): p. 332–346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gucciardi, D.F. and S. Gordon, Development and preliminary validation of the Cricket Mental Toughness Inventory (CMTI). Journal of Sports Sciences, 2009. 27(12): p. 1293–1310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Clough, P. and D. Strycharczyk, Developing mental toughness: improving performance, wellbeing and positive behaviour in others. 2012: Kogan Page Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  36. Crust, L. and P.J. Clough, Relationship between mental toughness and physical endurance. Perceptual and motor skills, 2005. 100(1): p. 192–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones, G., S. Hanton, and D. Connaughton, A Framework of Mental Toughness in the World’s Best Performers. 2007. 21(2): p. 243. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bull, S.J., et al., Towards an understanding of mental toughness in elite English cricketers. Journal of applied sport psychology, 2005. 17(3): p. 209–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Loehr, J., The new toughness training for sports: Mental, emotional, and physical conditioning. Nueva York: A Plume Book, 1995. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.