Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 119, 2021
3rd International Conference on Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Social Sciences (QQR’21)
Article Number 06005
Number of page(s) 13
Section Quality of Life Studies
Published online 24 August 2021
  1. T. Berners Lee. 1997. World Wide Web Consortium Launches International Program Office for Web Accessibility Initiative. Government, Industry, Research and Disability Organizations Join Forces to Promote Accessibility of the Web. ( accessed 24 June 2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Available at: [Google Scholar]
  3. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Available at: [Google Scholar]
  4. Introduction to Web Accessibility. Available at: AI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/ [Google Scholar]
  5. Accessibility Easterseals Study on the Impact of COVID-19 on People with Disabilities Executive Summary & Key Findings: May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview [Google Scholar]
  7. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Available at : [Google Scholar]
  8. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  9. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  10. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2. Working Draft Available at: [Google Scholar]
  11. Accessibility Principles. Available at: AI/fundamentals/accessibility-principles/ [Google Scholar]
  12. Perceivable Principle WCAG 2.1. Available at: CA21/#perceivable [Google Scholar]
  13. Operable Principle WCAG 2.1. Available at: CAG21/#operable [Google Scholar]
  14. Understandable Principle WCAG 2.1. Available at: CAG21/#understandable [Google Scholar]
  15. Robust Principle WCAG 2.1. Available at: CAG21/#robust [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Moumen, «Séminaire sur la méthodologie de recherche & guide des bonnes pratiques et techniques en communication, redaction et publication scientifique». (2018) [Google Scholar]
  17. Ministry of Solidarity, Social Development, Equality and Family. The National Disability Survey. Rabat, Morocco: 2014. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  18. the common charter for governmental websites Available at: [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Bousarhane, and N. Daoudi, «The Accessibility of Moroccan Public Websites: Evaluation of Three E-Government Websites». Electronic Journal of E-Government 12 (1): pp65-79-pp65-79. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Ismaili, E. Ouazzani Ibrahimi. «Mobile Learning as Alternative to Assistive Technology Devices for Special Needs Students». Education and Information Technologies 22 (3): 883–99 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Boumaghzel, et M.I. Hafidi Alaoui, «La technologie éducative et handicap dans l’enseignement supérieur au Maroc» «Cas de l’université Med V». Massalek Atarbya Wa Atakwine volume 2 N1 (2019) (accessed 01 February 2021). [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Aqle, D. Al-Thani, and A. Jaoua, «Can Search Result Summaries Enhance the Web Search Efficiency and Experiences of the Visually Impaired Users?» Universal Access in the Information Society, November, 1–22. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Arrue, M. Vigo, and J. Abascal, «Web Accessibility Awareness in Search Engine Results». Universal Access in the Information Society 7 (1): 103–16 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Rocio, A. Iglesias and L. Castano, «Evaluation of Accessibility Barriers and Learning Features in M-Learning Chat Applications for Users with Disabilities». Universal Access in the Information Society 16 (3): 593–607 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Smutny, and P. Schreiberova, «Chatbots for Learning: A Review of Educational Chatbots for the Facebook Messenger». Computers & Education 151 (juillet): 103862. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  26. Q. Liu, J. Huang, L. Wu, K. Zhu, and S. Ba, «CBET: Design and Evaluation of a Domain-Specific Chatbot for Mobile Learning». Universal Access in the Information Society 19 (3): 655–73 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Sitbon, P. Bellot, P. Blache. «Vers une recherche d’information adaptée aux utilisateurs dyslexiques». Document numerique Vol. 13 (1): 161–85. (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Lister, T. Coughlan, F. Iniesto, N. Freear, et P. Devine. «Accessible Conversational User Interfaces: Considerations for Design» In W4A ’20: Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference, article no. 5, 1–11. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Lidio Antonelli, E. Adriano N. da Silva, et R. Pontin M. Fortes. «A Model-Driven Development for Creating Accessible Web Menus». DSAI Procedia Computer Science 67:95–104. (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Francisco J. Estrada Martinez, José R. Hilera, S. Oton, et J. Aguado-Delgado. «Semantic Web Technologies Applied to Software Accessibility Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review». Universal Access in the Information Society, octobre, 1–25. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Harper, Y. Yesilada. «Web Authoring for Accessibility (WAfA)». Journal of Web Semantics 5 (3): 175–79. (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Montagud, F. Boronat, J. Pastor, D. Marfil. «Web-Based Platform for a Customizable and Synchronized Presentation of Subtitles in Single- and Multi-Screen Scenarios». Multimedia Tools and Applications 79 (29): 21889–923. (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Giakoumis, K. Votis, et D. Tzovaras, «Introducing Web Service Accessibility Assessment Techniques through a Unified Quality of Service Context». Service Oriented Computing and Applications 8 (2): 159–74. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. W. Seo, H. Jung, «Challenges and Opportunities to Improve the Accessibility of YouTube for People with Visual Impairments as Content Creators». Universal Access in the Information Society (2021). [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Shoaib, I. Hussain, H.T. Mirza, «Automatic Switching between Speech and NonSpeech: Adaptive Auditory Feedback in Desktop Assistance for the Visually Impaired». Universal Access in the Information Society 19 (4): 813–23. (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Pantula, et K.S. Kuppusamy, «AuDIVA: A Tool for Embedding Audio Descriptions to Enhance Video Accessibility for Persons with Visual Impairments». Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (14): 20005-18. (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Gonzalez, L. Moreno, et P. Martinez, «Approach Design of an Accessible Media Player». Universal Access in the Information Society 14 (1): 45–55. (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Chris J. Hughes, et M. Montagud, «Accessibility in 360° Video Players». Multimedia Tools and Applications, October, 1–28. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  39. M.A. Neerincx, A.H.M. Cremers, J.M. Kessens, D.A. van Leeuwen, et K.P. Truong. «Attuning Speech-Enabled Interfaces to User and Context for Inclusive Design: Technology, Methodology and Practice». Universal Access in the Information Society 8 (2): 109–22. (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.