Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 120, 2021
Sixth International Scientific Conference “BUSINESS AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT”
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 10
Section Business Development, Innovation and Circular Economy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112002002
Published online 24 August 2021
  1. Nielsen, Sustainable shoppers buy the change they wish to see in the world, (2018), https://www.nielsen.com/ssa/en/insights/report/2018/sustainable-shoppers-buy-the-change-they-wish-to-see-in-the-world/, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Carrero Bosch, C. Valor Martinez, J.M. Rosa Durán, The relationship between the consumer and social and environmental labels. Diagnostic study to guide the definition of public policies and business action, (2010), https://www.compromisorse.com/upload/estudios/000/89/EstudioEtiquetado.pdf, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Villaécija, Offensive against fraud of fake bio products, El Mundo, (2019), https://www.elmundo.es/economia/ahorroyconsumo/2019/08/31/5d6948f2fdddffa2218b465c.html, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Llopis Goig, Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 11, 145–165 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Dueñas Ocampo, J. Perdomo Ortiz, L.E. Villa Castaño, J. Manag. Econ. for Iberoamérica, 30(132), 287–300 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. M.P. Weinstein, R.E. Turner, C. Ibáñez, Sustain.: Sci. Pract. Policy, 9(1), 4–15 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Bermejo, From sustainable development according to Brundtland to sustainability as biomimesis, (Hegoa, Bilbao, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Drexhage, D. Murphy, Sustainable Development: from Brundtland to Rio 2012, Background Paper for consideration by the High Level Panel on Global Sustainability at its first meeting, 19 September 2010 (United Nations, New York, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. WCED, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development “Our common future” (Brundtland Report), (1987), https://undocs.org/es/A742/427, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  10. United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals, (2015), https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. J. Moreno, Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, 77, 168–182 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Failla, The Scuppie HandbookTM. A practical guide to living well while doing good, (2008), http://www.scuppie.com/, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  13. European Commission, Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: a business contribution to Sustainable Development (COM/2002/0347 final), (2002), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52002DC0347, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. C. De la Gonzalez, C. V. Martinez, Boletin Económico de ICE, 2755, 7–20 2003. [Google Scholar]
  15. D.J. Webb, L.A. Mohr, K.A. Harris, J. Bus. Res., 61(2), 91–98 2008 [Google Scholar]
  16. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. Implementing the partnership for growth and jobs: making Europe a pole of excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility (COM/2006/136 final), (2006), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0136:FIN:en:PDF, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  17. European Parliament, Report on corporate social responsibility: a new partnership (2006/2133/(INI)), (2006), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A6-2006-0471+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN, [Accessed: 19 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  18. A.C. Drichoutis, P. Lazaridis, R. Nayga, Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev., 9, 1–22 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Hartlieb, B. Jones, J. Bus. Ethics, 88(3), 583–600 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  20. C. D’Souza, M. Taghian, P. Lamb, Corp. Commun.: Int. J., 11(2), 162–173 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Zadek, S. Lingayah, M. Forstater, Social labels: tools for ethical trade (New Economics Foundation, Brussels, 1998) [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Maniatis, J. Clean. Prod., 132, 215–218 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Gifford, Int. J. Psychol., 49, 141–157 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Hoek, N. Roling, D. Holdsworth, J. Mark. Manage., 29, 772–792 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Lanero, J.L. Vazquez, C. Sahelices, Sustainability, 12(21), 1–19 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  26. H.J. Kim, S.H. Lee, K. Yang, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 39, 249–260 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  27. M.F. Teisl, S. Peavey, F. Newman, For. Prod. J., 52(1), 44–50 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  28. P.J. Alevizou, C.J. Oates, S. McDonald, Sustainability, 7, 9729–8747 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  29. C. D’Souza, M. Taghian, P. Lamb, R. Peretiatko, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 31, 371–376 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Sirieix, M. Delanchy, H. Remaud, L. Zepeda, P. Gurviez, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 37, 143–151 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  31. K.M.R. Taufique, C. Siwar, B. Talib, F.H. Sarah, N. Chamhuri, Sustainability, 6, 2176–2200 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  32. C. Amos, J.C. Hansen, S. King, J. Consum. Mark., 36(4), 516–526 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  33. N. Darnall, H. Ji, D.A. Vazquez-Brust, J. Bus. Ethics, 150, 953–969 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Fanasch, B. Frick, J. Clean. Prod., 249, 1–16 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  35. U.J.J. Hahnel, O. Arnold, M. Waschto, L. Korcaj, K. Hillmann, D. Roser, H. Spada, Front. Psychol., 6, 1–17 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  36. V. Gruber, B.B. Schlegelmilch, M.J. Houston, Psychol. Mark., 31(6), 440–450 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  37. G.A. Lazzarrini, V.H.M. Visschers, M. Siegrist, Food quality and preference, 60, 165177 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Rousseau, Food Quality and Preference, 44, 92–100 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  39. Regulation EU 2012/1151 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, OJEU, L343, 1–29 (Dec. 2012) [Google Scholar]
  40. Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, OJEU, L 150, 1–92 (June 2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.