Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 11
Section 21st Century Learning Approaches & Sustainable innovations in Language and Communications
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Akbarov, A., Gonen, K., & Aydogan, H. (2018). Students' Attitudes toward Blended Learning in EFL Context. Acta Didáctica Napocensia, 11(1), 61–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albiladi, W.S., & Alshareef, K.K. (2019). BL in English Teaching and Learning : A Review of the Current Literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 10, p. 232. 1002.03 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2010). Blended learning in Saudi universities: challenges and perspectives. ALT-J, 18(1), 49–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen, I.E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950. [Google Scholar]
  5. Al Zumor, A.W.Q., Al Refaai, I.K., Eddin, E.A.B., & Al-Rahman, F.H.A. (2013). EFL Students' Perceptions of a Blended Learning Environment: Advantages, Limitations and Suggestions for Improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95–110. [Google Scholar]
  6. Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing Students' Language Skills through Blended Learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 220–229. [Google Scholar]
  7. Betts, K. (2014). Factors influencing faculty participation & retention in online & blended education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(1): 1. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhagat, K.K., Chang, C.N., & Chang, C.Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3): 134142. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chao, C.Y., Chen, Y.T., & Chuang, K.Y. (2015). Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: a study in high school engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 514–526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gruba, P., & Hinkelman, D. (2012). Blending technologies in second language classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoang, N.T. (2015. EFL teachers’ perceptions and experiences of BL in a Vietnamese university. Office of Education Research; Faculty of Education. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  12. Hong, K., & Samimy, K., (2010). The influence of L2 teachers' use of CALL modes on language learners' reactions to BL. CALICO Journal, 27(2), p.328–348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ivankova, N.V., Creswell, J.W., & Stick, S.L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field methods, 18(1), 3–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ja'ashan, M.M.N.H. (2015). Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Blended Learning for English Courses: A Case Study of Students at University of Bisha. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 40–50. [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson, C.P., & Marsh, D. (2014). Blended Language Learning: An Effective Solution but Not without Its Challenges. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(3), 23–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Joosten, T.M., Barth, D., Harness, L., & Weber, N.L. (2014). The impact of instructional development and training for blended teaching on course effectiveness. Blended learning: Research perspectives, 2, 173–189. [Google Scholar]
  17. MacDonald, J. (2008). BL and online tutoring: A good practice guide. Aldershot, UK: Gower. [Google Scholar]
  18. Modell, S. (2005). Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications. Management accounting research, 16(2), 231–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moskal, P.D., & Cavanagh, T.B. (2014). Scaling BL evaluation beyond the university. BL: Research perspectives, 2, 34–51. [Google Scholar]
  20. Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea?. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murphy, P. (2008). Defining pedagogy. In K. Hall, P. Murphy & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities. Milton Keynes: Sage publication. [Google Scholar]
  22. Partridge, H., Ponting, D., & McCay, M. (2011). Good practice report: BL. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  23. Rasskazova, T., Dubina, N., Yedik, N., & Aksenova, V. (2019). BLENDED LEARNING IN L2: MOTIVATION OR DE-MOTIVATION?. INTED2019 Proceedings, 6379–6384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rubio, F., & Thoms, J.J. (2014). Hybrid language teaching and learning: Exploring theoretical, pedagogical and curricular issues. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sharma, P. (2010). Key Concepts in ELT. ELT Journal Volume 64/4 p.456. Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor, J.A., & Newton, D. (2013). Beyond BL: A case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 54–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vaughan, N.D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D.R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vietnamese Government. (2012). Quyet dinh phe duyet “chien luoc phat trien giao duc 20112020' (Descision on approving strategies for developing Vietnamese education period 20112020). Hanoi, Vietnam. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vuong, N.H.A., Tan, C.K., & Lee, K.W. (2018). Students’ Perceived Challenges of Attending a Flipped EFL Classroom in Viet Nam. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(11), 1504–1510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.