Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Part 2 - Business and Economy for Sustainable Future
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112404001
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Abdullah, H., Jali, M.R.M., & Ibrahim, F.W. (2017). The current state of Malaysia’s journey towards a green economy: The perceptions of the companies on environmental efficiency and sustainability. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(1), 253–258. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abubakar, T. (2014). A Study of Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Supply Chain. (PhD). University of Central Lancashire, [Google Scholar]
  3. Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of business ethics, 108(1), 61–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aras, G., Tezcan, N., & Kutlu Furtuna, O. (2018). Multidimensional comprehensive corporate sustainability performance evaluation model: Evidence from an emerging market banking sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 600–609. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.175 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aziz, N.A.A., Manab, N.A., & Othman, S.N. (2015). Exploring the perspectives of corporate governance and theories on sustainability risk management (SRM). Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5(10): 1148. DOI: 10.18488/journal.aefr/2015.5.10/102.10.1148.1158 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. COSO. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management Integrating with Strategy and Performance, available at: www.erm.coso.org. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  7. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Farrell, M., & Gallagher, R. (2019). Moderating influences on the ERM maturity-performance relationship. Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 616–628. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.10.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Foo, V., Jamal, A.A.A., Karim, M.R.A., & Ulum, Z.K.A.B. (2015). Capital structure and corporate performance: Panel evidence from oil and gas companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 6(6), 371–379. [Google Scholar]
  10. Freeman, R.E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach: Cambridge University Press. New York, USA. [Google Scholar]
  11. George, R.A., Siti-Nabiha, A., Jalaludin, D., & Abdalla, Y.A. (2016). Barriers to and enablers of sustainability integration in the performance management systems of an oil and gas company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 197–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. The Global Risks Report. (2016). Retrieved from World Economic Forum, Switzerland: [Google Scholar]
  13. Govt, M. (2017). Malaysia - Oil and Gas. Available at https://www.export.gov/article?id=Malaysia-Oil-and-Gas-Equipment. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hajar, H.A.A., Tweissi, A., Hajar, Y.A.A., Al-Weshah, R., Shatanawi, K.M., Imam, R., ... Hajer, M.A.A. (2020). Assessment of the Municipal Solid Waste Management Sector Development in Jordan towards Green Growth by Sustainability Window Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jagoda, K., & Wojcik, P. (2019). Implementation of risk management and corporate sustainability in the Canadian oil and gas industry. Accounting Research Journal, 32(3), 381–398. DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-05-2016-0053 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jan, A.A., Lai, F.W., Daraz, M.U., Tahir, M., Ali, S.E.A., Zahid, M., & Shad, M.K. (2021). Integrating sustainability practices into islamic corporate governance for sustainable firm performance: from the lens of agency and stakeholder theories. Quality & Quantity. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01261-0 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kasztelan, A. (2017). Green Growth, Green Economy and Sustainable Development: Terminological and Relational Discourse. Prague Economic Papers, 2017(4), 487–499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, S.E., Kim, H., & Chae, Y. (2014). A new approach to measuring green growth: Application to the OECD and Korea. Futures, 63, 37–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Klimczak, K.M. (2007). Risk Management Theory: A comprehensive empirical assessment. Kozminski Working Paper No. 01-2007, 22. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lai, F.W., & Shad, M.K. (2017). Economic Value Added Analysis for Enterprise Risk Management. Global Business and Management Research, 9(18), 338. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lai, F.W., Shad, M.K., & Khan, A.A. (2017). Value Creating Determinants Of Enterprise Risk Management And Its Economic Value Added. Paper presented at the IEBMC 2017 - 8th International Economics and Business Management Conference, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, B., & Zhu, J. (2019). Fiscal spending and green economic growth: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 83, 264–271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mark, B., & Showalter, S. (2015). ERM and Sustainability: Togather on teh Road Ahead. Strategic Finance, 96(9): 32. [Google Scholar]
  24. McShane, M. (2018). Enterprise risk management: History and a design-science proposal. The Journal of Risk Finance, 19(2), 137–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. OECD. (2017). Green Growth Indicators 2017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Orazalin, N., Mahmood, M., & Narbaev, T. (2019). The impact of sustainability performance indicators on financial stability: evidence from the Russian oil and gas industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(8), 8157–8168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Power, M. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting, organizations and society, 34(6): 849855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Saardchom, N. (2013). Enterprise Risk Management under Sustainability Platform. Journal of Business and Economics, 4(1), 32–41. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shad, M.K., & Lai, F.-W. (2015a). A conceptual framework for enterprise risk management performance measure through economic value added. Global Business and Management Research, 7(2): 1. [Google Scholar]
  30. Shad, M.K., & Lai, F.-W. (2015b, April 23-24-2015). Developing an Enterprise Risk Management Value Enhancing Model Manifested through Economic Value Added Analysis Paper presented at the WSEAS Applied Computer and Applied Computational Science (ACACOS '15), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shad, M.K., & Lai, F.-W. (2015c). Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance Validated Through Economic Value Added Factors. International Journal of Economics and Statistics, 3, 148–154. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shad, M.K., & Lai, F.-W. (2019). Enterprise Risk Management Implementation and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Malaysian Oil and Gas Industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(9). [Google Scholar]
  33. Shad, M.K., Lai, F.-W., Fatt, C.L., Klemes, J.J., & Bokhari, A. (2019). Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 415–425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shad, M.K., Lai, F.-W., Shamim, A., & Khan, A.A. (2018). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Practices in the Malaysian Oil and Gas Companies. Platform: A Journal of Management and Humanities, 1(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shah, S.Q.A., Lai, F.-W., Shad, M.K., Konecna, Z., Goni, F.A., Chofreh, A.G., & Klemes, J.J. (2021). The Inclusion of Intellectual Capital into the Green Board Committee to Enhance Firm Performance. Sustainability, 13(19): 10849. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10849 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shortall, R., Davidsdottir, B., & Axelsson, G. (2015). Geothermal energy for sustainable development: A review of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 44, 391–406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Soomro, M.A., & Lai, F.-W. (2017). Examining A New Paradigm of Enterprise Sustainability Risk Management. Global Business & Management Research, 9(1). [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun, Y., Bi, K., & Yin, S. (2020). Measuring and Integrating Risk Management into Green Innovation Practices for Green Manufacturing under the Global Value Chain. Sustainability, 12(2): 545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tasmin, R., & Muazu, H. (2017). Moderating Effects of Risk Management Function on Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management Implementation in Malaysian Oil and Gas Sector: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 4(2). [Google Scholar]
  40. Tasmin, R., Muazu, M., Aziati, A.N., & Zohadi, N. (2020). The mediating effect of enterprise risk management implementation on operational excellence in the Malaysian oil and gas sector: a conceptual framework. Future Business Journal, 6(1), 1–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. US. (2017). U.S. Energy Information Administration. Production of Crude Oil including Lease Condensate 2016. Retrieved 27 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Guo, X. (2019). Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors. Energy Policy, 132, 611–619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. WBCSD. (2017). Sustainability and Enterprise Risk Management: The First Step Towards Integration. Retrieved from Switzerland: [Google Scholar]
  44. Weng, H.-H.R., Chen, J.-S., & Chen, P.-C. (2015). Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustainability, 7(5), 4997–5026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wheeler, D., Colbert, B., & Freeman, R.E. (2003). Focusing on value: Reconciling corporate social responsibility, sustainability and a stakeholder approach in a network world. Journal of general management, 28(3), 1–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yilmaz, A.K., & Flouris, T. (2010). Managing corporate sustainability: Risk management process based perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 4(2): 162. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zou, X., Isa, C.R., & Rahman, M. (2017). Valuation of enterprise risk management in the manufacturing industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1369877 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.