EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 124 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 124 (2021) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Part 2 - Business and Economy for Sustainable Future
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112404002
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Al-Khulaifi, A.S. (2012). The relationship between government revenue and expenditure in Qatar: A cointegration and causality investigation. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(9): 142148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aslan, M., & Tasdemir, M. (2009). Is fiscal synchronization hypothesis relevant for Turkey? Evidence from cointegration and causality tests with endogenous structural breaks. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 12, 14–25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aziz, M.A., Habibullah, M.S., Azman-Saini, W., & Azali, M. (2000). Testing for causality between taxation and government spending: An application of Toda-Yamamoto approach. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 8(1), 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baghestani, H., & McNown, R. (1994). Do revenues or expenditures respond to budgetary disequilibria? Southern Economic Journal, 311–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barro, R.J. (1979). On the determination of the public debt. Journal of political Economy, 87(5, Part 1), 940–971. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buchanan, J.M., & Wagner, R.E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. [Google Scholar]
  7. Buttiglione, L., Lane, P., Reichlin, L., & Reinhart, V. (2014). Deleveraging, what deleveraging? The 16th Geneva Report on the world economy. International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies/Center for Economic Policy Research, September. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chee, S. (1990). The political economy of governance: Why the Malaysian government has grown. The Malaysian economy in transition, 54–73. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fasano, U., & Wang, Q. (2002). Testing the relationship between government spending and revenue: Evidence from GCC countries. [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedman, M. (1978). The limitations of tax limitation. Policy review (5), 7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hong, T.J. (2009). Tax-and-spend or spend-and-tax? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 5(1), 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  12. Irandoust, M. (2018). Government spending and revenues in Sweden 1722-2011: evidence from hidden cointegration. Empirica, 45(3), 543–557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jalil, A.Z.A., & Harun, H. (2012). Fiscal decision and fiscal performance: The case of Kelantan and Penang. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1, 193–202. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00023-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Khan, H., & Bangash, R. (2013). Nexus Between Microcredit and Poverty Alleviation: Time Series Evidence from Pakistan. Business & Economic Review, 5(2), 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Khan, H., Marimuthu, M., & Lai, F.-W. (2020). Fiscal deficit and its less inflationary sources of borrowing with the moderating role of political instability: Evidence from Malaysia. Sustainability, 12(1): 366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Loganathan, N., & Taha, R. (2007). Have Taxes Led Government Expenditure in Malaysia? Journal of International Management Studies, 2(2), 99–113. [Google Scholar]
  17. Marimuthu, M., Khan, H., & Bangash, R. (2021a). Fiscal Causal Hypotheses and Panel Cointegration Analysis for Sustainable Economic Growth in ASEAN. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(2), 99–109. [Google Scholar]
  18. Marimuthu, M., Khan, H., & Bangash, R. (2021b). Reverse Causality between Fiscal and Current Account Deficits in ASEAN: Evidence from Panel Econometric Analysis. Mathematics, 9(10): 1124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mehrara, M., Pahlavani, M., & Elyasi, Y. (2011). Government revenue and government expenditure nexus in Asian countries: Panel cointegration and causality. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 199–207. [Google Scholar]
  20. Meltzer, A.H., & Richard, S.F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Musgrave, R. (1966). Principles of budget determination. Public finance: Selected readings, 15–27. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mutascu, M. (2015). A bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis of government revenues and expenditures in the PIIGS countries. [Google Scholar]
  23. Narayan, P.K., & Narayan, S. (2006). Government revenue and government expenditure nexus: evidence from developing countries. Applied Economics, 38(3), 285–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peacock, A.T., & Wiseman, J. (1979). Approaches to the analysis of government expenditure growth. Public Finance Quarterly, 7(1), 3–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Reinhart, C.M., & Rogoff, K.S. (2010). Growth in a Time of Debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573–578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Roberts, P.C. (1978). Idealism in public choice theory. Journal of Monetary Economics, 4(3), 603–615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ullah, N. (2016). The Relationship of Government Revenue and Government Expenditure: A case study of Malaysia. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.