Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 10
Section Part 2 - Business and Economy for Sustainable Future
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Abidin, Z.Z., Kamal, N.M., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 150–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abu-Abbas, B. (n.d.). Financial leverage and firm performance: evidence from Amman Stock Exchange. [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-matari, E.M., Al-Swidi, K.A., & Btfadzil, H.F. (2014). The effect on the relationship between board of directors characteristics on firm performance in Oman. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(3), 556–574. [Google Scholar]
  4. Amer, M., Ragab, A.A., & Ragheb, M.A. (2014). Board characteristics and firm performance: evidence from New Zealand. Auckland University of Technology, 8(5), 1–132. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anis, M., Chizema, A., Lui, X., & Fakhreldin, H. (2017). The Impact of board characteristics on firms financial performance - Evidence from the Egyptian listed companies. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: H Interdisciplinary, 17(5), 1–103. [Google Scholar]
  6. Badu, L.A., & Appiah, K.O. (2017). The Impact of corporate board size on firm performance: Evidence from Ghana and Nigeria. Research in Business and Management, 4(2), 1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dalton, D.R., & Daily, C.M. (2000). Board and financial Performance, the bigger is better. Journal of Management, 1157–1177. [Google Scholar]
  8. Elvin, P., & Hamid, N.I.N.A. (2016). Ownership structure, corporate governance and firm performance. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(S3), 99–108. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghazali, N.A.M. (2010). Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 20(2), 109–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Green, C.P., & Homroy, S. (2018). Female directors, board committees and firm performance. European Economic Review, 102(1), 19–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hagel, J., Brown, J.S., Samoylova, T., & Lui, M. (2013). Success or struggle : ROA as a true measure of business performance. Deloitte University Press, 4–18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Harvey, P., Chamisa, E., Abdulla, C., & Smith, C. (2015). An analysis of corporate governance and company performance: A South Africa perspective. South African. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 115–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hennessy, C.A. (2004). Tobin’s Q, debt overhang, and investment. Journal of Finance. [Google Scholar]
  15. Htay, S.N., Rashid, H.M.A., Adnan, M.A., & Meera, A.K.M. (2011). Corporate governance and risk management information disclosure in Malaysian Listed Banks : Panel data analysis. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7(4), 159–176. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hussain Javed, Z., Rao, H., Akram, B., Fayyaz Nazir M., Zakeriya University, B., & Cand, M.P. (2015). Effect of financial leverage on performance of the firms: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Economics and Business, 65(1), 87–95. [Google Scholar]
  17. Idawati, W., & Wahyudi, A. (2015). Effect of earning per share (EPS) and return on assets (ROA) against share price on coal mining company listed in Indonesia stocks exchange. Journal of Resource Development and Management, 7(June 2016), 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  18. Iqbal, A., Raza, H., Farrukh, M., & Mubeen, M. (2016). Impact of leverages on share price: Evidence from cement sector of Pakistan. Industrial Engineering Letters, 6(6), 44–48. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johl, S.K., Kaur, S., & Cooper, B.J. (2015). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed firms. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(2), 239–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Julizaerma, M.K., & Sori, Z.M. (2012). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance of Malaysian public listed companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 1077–1085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kabajeh, M.A., AL Nu’aimat, S.M., & Dahmash, F.N. (2012). The relationship between the ROA , ROE and ROI ratios with Jordanian insurance public companies market share prices, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(11), 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalsie, A., & Shrivastav, S.M. (2016). Analysis of board size and firm performance: Evidence from NSE companies using panel data approach. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 9(2), 148–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liang, Q., Xu, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2013). Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lipton, M. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 59–77. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mat Nor, F., Shariff, F.M., & Ibrahim, I. (2010). The effects of concentrated ownership on the performance of firms: Do external shareholdings and board structure matter”? Jurnal Pengurusan, 30, 93–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mohd Nor, M., Shafee, N.B., & Samsuddin, N. (2014). Board characteristics and Malaysian firm performance. Global Journal of Business Research in Accounting, Auditing and Business Ethics, (3), 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  27. Moscu, R. (2013). The Relationship between firm performance and board characteristics in Romania. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(1), 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mwangi, L.W., Makau, S.M., Kosimbei, G., & Pouraghajan, A. (2012). Relationship between capital structure and performance of non-financial companies listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. Global Journal of Contemporary Research in Accounting, Auditing and Business Ethics (GJCRA), 1(9), 72–90. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nazar, M.C.A. (2012). The relationship between board characteristics and firm performance of Sri Lankan listed companies. Business and Management, 6(2), 343–350. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nguyen, T.T.M., Evans, E., & Lu, M. (2017). Independent directors, ownership concentration and firm performance in listed companies. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(2), 204–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Puthenpurackal, J., & Upadhyay, A. (2010). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The impact of information environment. Twenty Years after Cadbury, Ten Years after Sarbanes-Oxley: Challenges of Corporate Governance. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rahman, H.U., Ibrahim, M.Y., & Ahmad, A.C. (2015). Corporate governance, firm financial performance and shareholders’ confidence: A proposed analysis of MCCG 2012. Global Business & Management Research: An International Journal, 7(1), 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  33. Raza, M.W. (2013). The effect of financial leverage on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Karachi Stock Exchange. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 50383(September 2013), 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sahu, T., & Manna, A. (2013). Impact of board composition and board meeting on firms’ performance: A study of selected Indian companies. Vilakshan. XIMB Journal, 10(2), 99–112. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shabbir, M. (2018). Women on corporate boards and firm performance, preliminary results from Italian listed companies after the introduction of gender quota law 120/2011. Journal of Business and Financial Affairs, 7(1), 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  36. Triana, & Marwan Asri. (2017). The impact of female directors on firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, volume 31(1), 19–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yasser, Q.R. (2012). The effects of female directors on firms’ performance in Pakistan. Modern Economy, 03(07), 817–825. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.