Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 07006
Number of page(s) 8
Section Political Science and Cultural Sustainability & Quality Education for Sustainable Future
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Adadan, E., & Oner, D. (2018). Examining preservice teachers’ reflective thinking skills in the context of web-based portfolios: The role of metacognitive awareness. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(11), 26–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buehl, M. M., & Fives, H. (2009). Exploring teachers’ beliefs about teaching knowledge: Where does it come from? Does it change? The Journal of Experimental Education, 77 (4), 367–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Choy, S. C., Yim, J. S., & Tan, P. L. (2017). Reflective thinking among preservice teachers:A Malaysian perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 27(2), 234–251. [Google Scholar]
  4. Clara, M. (2014). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambigious notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3) 261271. DOI: 10.1177/0022487114552028. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cox, E. (2005). Adult learners learning from experience: Using a reflective practice model to support work-based learning. Reflective Practice, 6 (4), 459–472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  7. Crosswell, L., & Beutel, D. (2017). 21st century teachers: how non-traditional pre-service teachers navigate their initial experiences of contemporary classrooms. Asia-pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  8. Farrell, S. C. (2015). The practices of encouraging TESOL teachers to engage in reflective practices: An appraisal of recent research contributions. Language Teaching Research, 20(2) 223–247, DOI: 10.1177/1362168815617335. [Google Scholar]
  9. Goh, P. S., & Wong, K. T. (2014). Beginning teachers’ conceptions of competency: implications to educational policy and teacher education in Malaysia. Education Research Policy, 13:65–79. DOI: 10.1007/s10671-013-9147-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanushek, E., & Woessmann, L. (2015). Universal basic skills: What countries stands to gain. London: OECD. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kabilan, M. K. (2007). English language teachers reflecting on reflections: A malaysian expereince. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4): 681–705. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kek, M., & Huijser, H. (2011). Exploring the combined relationships of student and teacher factors on learning approaches and self-directed learning readiness at a Malaysian university. Studies in Higher Education, Megan Kek & Henk Huijser (2011) Exploring the combined relationships of student and teacher factors on learning approaches and selfdirected learning readiness at a Malay 36(2), 185-208. DOI: 10.1080/03075070903. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kerrigan, M. R. (2014). A framework for understanding community college’ organisational capapcity for data use: A convergent parallel mixed method study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(4) 341–362. DOI: 10.1177/1558689814523518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee, H.-J. (2005). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21 (6), 699–715. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mustapha, S. I. (2013). Amalan bimbingan pengajaran pensyarah dan guru pembimbing dalam program mentoring praktikum serta impaknya terhadap kualiti guru pelatih. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 38(1), 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nambiar, R. M., & Thang, S. (2015). Examining Malaysian teachers’ online blogs for reflective practices: towards teacher professional development. Language and Education, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nasir, S. M., & Sulaima, N. F. (2015). Pemikiran Reflektif: Meneroka Amalan Pemikiran Siswa Pendidik. (Reflective Thinking: Exploring Thinking Practices in Student Teachers). Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 18(2), 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nordin, A. B., Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2013). Assessing quality assurance for teaching and learning in higher education in Malaysia: Reflecting on its policy and processes. Life Science Journal, 10(1), 1222–1232. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ong, W. A., Swanto, S., & Al-Saqqaf, A. (2018). Pre-service ESL teachers engaging in reflective practice: Current observations and perceived challenges. Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 8(2), 5–18. [Google Scholar]
  22. Quendler, E., & Lamb, M. (2016). Learning as a lifelong process - meeting the challenges of the changing employability landscape: competences, skills and knowledge for sustainable development. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 26 (3), 273–293. DOI: 10.1504/ijceell.2016.078447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining refelction: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Senom, F., Zakaria, A. R., & Ahmad Shah, S. S. (2013). Novice Teachers’ Challenges and Survival: Where do Malaysian ESL Teachers Stand? American Journal of Educational Research, 1 (4), 119–125. DOI: 10.12691/education-1-4-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tan, S. Y., & Halili, S. H. (2015). Effective teaching of higher-order thinking (HOT) in education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(2), 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  26. Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for Language Learners. London: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.