EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 124 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 124 (2021) 07005 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 07005
Number of page(s) 25
Section Political Science and Cultural Sustainability & Quality Education for Sustainable Future
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112407005
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Alexander, S. 2001, ‘E-learning developments and experiences’, Education + Training, vol. 43, no. 4/5, pp. 240-248: https://scihub.bban.top/https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910110399247 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Busaidi, K.A. 2013, ‘An empirical investigation is linking learners’ adoption of blended learning to their intention of full e-learning’, Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1168-1176. https://www.tandfonline.Com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929x.2013.774047 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alharthi, A.D., Spichkova, M. & Hamilton, M. 2019, ‘Sustainability requirements for eLearning systems: a systematic literature review and analysis, Requirements Engineering, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 523-543. https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/docview/2047952359?pq-origsite=primo [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Basilaia G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G. (2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate response to the COVID-19 virus infection in Georgia. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 8(III). [Google Scholar]
  5. Purvis, B., Mao, Y. & Robinson, D. (2019) Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins, Sustainability Science, volume 14, 681-695 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell, S., Douce, C., Caeiro, S., Teixeira, A., Martín-Aranda, R. & Otto, D. 2017, Sustainability and distance learning: a diverse European experience? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning, volume 32, 95-102 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brodie, M. 2012, ‘Building the sustainable library at Macquarie university, Australian Academic & Research Libraries, vol. 43, pp. 4–16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271746972 Building the S ustainable Library at Macquarie University [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhandari, P. 2020, An introduction to Qualitative research, Scribbr, viewed 15 June 2021, <https://www.scribbr.com/methodoloQv/qualitative-research/>. [Google Scholar]
  9. Calero, C. & Piattini, M. 2017, ‘Puzzling out software sustainability’, Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, vol. 16, pp. 117-124. https://alarcos.esi.uclm.es/DocumentosWeb/2017-Sustainable%20Computing-Calero.pdf [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chun, L., Wang, Q. & Jing, L. (2012), What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong, Computers & Education, volume 59(2), 569–579 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dan, T. 2019, Online education promotes Vietnam’s digital economy, VnExpress, viewed 15 June 2021, <https://vnexpress.net/giao-duc-truc-tuyen-thuc-dav-nen-kinh-te-so-viet-nam-3931721.html>. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hocmai 2020, Hocmai. vn - Common school of Vietnamese students, Hocmai, viewed 15 June 2021, <https://hocmai.vn/mod/resource/view.php?id=32440>. [Google Scholar]
  13. Le, V. 2019, Foreign capital poured into education, VnExpress, viewed 15 June 2021, <https://vnexpress.net/von-ngoai-do-vao-giao-duc-4015488.html>. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dan, T. 2020, Online Study Advantages, VnExpress, viewed 15 June 2021, <https://vnexpress.net/diem-cong-cua-hoc-truc-tuyen-4070418.html>. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fox, N. 2009, ‘Using interviews in a research project’, National Institute for Health Research. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E. & Chadwick, B. 2008, ‘Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups’, British Dental Journal, vol. 204, pp. 291-295. https://www.nature.com/articles/bdi.2008.192ffauthor-information [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunn, C. 2016, Sustainability factors for e-learning initiatives, Research in Learning Technology, Volume 18 - Issue 2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hox, J.J. & Boeije, H.R. 2005, Data collection, Primary versus Secondary. In K. Kempf-Leonard (ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 593–599. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hancock, B., Windridge, K. & Ockleford, E. 2007, ‘An introduction to Qualitative research’, The NIHR Research Design Service for the East Midlands. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ionescu, A., Paschia, L., Nicolau, L., learningthe the Tanescu, S., Stancescu, V., Coman, M. & Uzlau, M. 2020, Sustainability Analysis of the E-Learning Education System during Pandemic Period—COVID-19 in Romania, MDPI Sustainability [Google Scholar]
  21. Jankowska, M.A. & Marcum, J.W. 2010, ‘Sustainability challenge for academic libraries: planning for the future, College and Research Libraries, vol. 71, pp. 160–170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283144976 Sustainability Challenge forAcademicLibraries Planning for the Future [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, K.J. & Bonk, C.J. 2006, ‘The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: the survey says…’, EDUCAUSE QUARTERLY, pp. 22-30. https://faculty.weber.edu/eamsel/Research%20Groups/On-line%20Learning/Bonk%20(2006).pdf [Google Scholar]
  23. Lago, P., Koçak, S.A., Crnkovic, I. & Penzenstadler, B. 2015, ‘Framing sustainability as a property of software quality’, Communication of the ACM, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 70-78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282325166 Framing Susta inability as a Property of Software Quality [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Littlefield J. (2018). The difference between synchronous and asynchronous distance learning https://www.thoughtco.com/synchronous-distance-learning-asynchronous-distance-learning-1097959 [Google Scholar]
  25. Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Lundqvist, K.O., & Williams, S.A. 2015, ‘Massive open online courses and economic sustainability’, European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 95-111. https://scihub.bban.top/10.1515/eurodl-2015-0015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A. & Fontenot, R. 2013, ‘Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: a review of Qualitative interviews in IS research’, The Journal of computer information systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 11–22 https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/docview/1471047612?pq-origsite=primo [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. McBrien J. L., Cheng R., Jones P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10 (3), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morgan, D.L. 1998, The Focus Group Guidebook, SAGE Publications, Inc., London. [Google Scholar]
  29. Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P.R. & Sharma, D. 2018, ‘Online learning: adoption, continuance and learning outcome - a review of the literature, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 43, pp. 1-14. https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/science/article/pii/S0268401216304662 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ponto, J. 2015, ‘Understanding and evaluating survey research’, Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, vol. 6, pp. 168–171. [Google Scholar]
  31. Prensky, M. 2001, ‘Digital natives, digital centredevelopment learningboosting immigrants part 2: do they really think differently?’, On the Horizon, vol. 9 no. 6, pp. 1-6. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/10748120110424843/full/html [Google Scholar]
  32. Rennie, F. & Morrison, T. 2013, E-learning and social networking handbook: resources for higher education, 2ndresearchsustainabilityand Markets 2018, Research and markets global earning management system (LMS) market analysis and forecasts 2017-2025 - the need for LMS in HEO driving market growth. [Google Scholar]
  33. Stepanyan, K., Littlejohn, A. & Margaryan, 2010, ‘Sustainable elearning in a changing landscape: a scoping study (SeLScope)’, UK Higher Education Academy. [Google Scholar]
  34. Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J.L., Assche, F.A., Parra, G. & Klerkx, J. 2014, ‘Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities’, Personal Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 18, pp, 1499-1514. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00779-013-0751-2 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vietnamnews 2021, E-learning methods see boom during COVID-19 pandemic https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/715821/e-learning-methods-see-boom-during-covid-19-pandemic.html [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhan, Z., Fong, P.S., Mei, H., Chang, X., Liang, T. & Ma, Z. 2015, ‘Sustainability education in massive open online courses: a content analysis approach’, Sustainability, vol. 7, pp. 2274-2300. https://scihub.bban.top/https7/doi.org/10.3390/su7032274 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.