EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 124 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 124 (2021) 08004 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 08004
Number of page(s) 13
Section Human Capital Management for Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112408004
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Abdeljawad, I., & Masri, R. (2020). Board characteristics and corporate performance: Evidence from Palestine. An-Najah University Journal for Research, 34 (3), 1–26. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3533334 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adhikary, B., & Mitra, R. (2016). Determinants of audit committee independence in the financial sector of Bangladesh. Applied Finance and Accounting, 2 (2), 46–56. doi: 10.11114/afa.v2i2.1591 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmad, M., & Ahmed, N. (2016). Testing the relationship between intellectual capital and a firm’s performance: an empirical investigation regarding financial industries of Pakistan. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 13(2), 250273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arulvel, K., & Pratheepkanth, P. (2019). Board composition and firm performance: The Sri Lanka case. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Oman Chapter), 8 (1), 40–50. doi: 10.12816/0052851 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Astami, E., & Rusmin, R. (2020). The role of board of directors and audit committee in financially distressed firms. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability, 3 (1), 113–144. doi: 10.24191/ijsms.v3i1.8046 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baig, F., Rehman, I., & Latif, F. (2019). What drives the impact of women directors on firm performance? Evidence from intellectual capital efficiency of US listed firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1–18. doi: 10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0222I [Google Scholar]
  7. Barr, M. (2019). Chua Beng Huat liberalism disavowed: Communitarianism and state capitalism in Singapore. Journal Of Social Issues In Southeast Asia, 8 (2), 338–341. doi: 10.20495/seas.8.2_338 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bayraktaroglu, A., Calisir, F., & Baskak, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20 (3), 406–425. doi: 10.1108/JIC-12-2017-0184 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boateng, F., Manu, D., & Adesi, M. (2019). Alinging strategic objectives to corporate governance objectives in construction professional service firms. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 9(1). 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bually, A., Cummings, R., & Hamdan, A. (2019). Intellectual capital efficiency and bank’s performance: A comparative study after the global financial crisis. Pacific Accounting Review, 31 (4), 672–694. doi: 10.1108/PAR-04-2019-0039 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Castro, G., Vial, I., & Verde, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and the firm: evolution and research trends. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20 (4), 555–580. doi: 0.1108/JIC-12-2018-0221 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, C. (2016). Solving the puzzle of corporate governance of state-owned enterprises: The path of Temasek model in Singapore and lessons for China. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 36(2), 303–370. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chowdhury, L., Rana, T., & Azim, M. (2019). Intellectual capital efficiency and organisational performance: In the context of the pharmaceutical industry in Bangladesh. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20 (6), 784–806. doi: 10.1108/JIC-10-2018-0171 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dionne, G., Chun, O., & Triki, T. (2019). The governance of risk management: The importance of directors’ independence and financial knowledge. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 247–277. doi: 10.1111/rmir.12129 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Duppati, G., Rao, N., Matlani, N., & Scrimgeour, T. (2020). Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from India and Singapore. Applied Economics, 52 (14), 1553–1565. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1676872 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Einardottir, T., Rafndottir, G., & Sigrun, M. (2020). Networks, homogeneity and gender in Icelandic business elites. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36 (1), 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101091 [Google Scholar]
  17. Enache, L., & Hussainey, K. (2020). The substitutive relation between voluntary disclosure and corporate governance in their effects on firm performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 54, 413–445. doi: 10.1007/s11156-019-00794-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Farooque, O., Buachoom, W., & Sun, L. (2020). Board, audit committee, ownership and financial performance - emerging trends from Thailand. Pacific Accounting Review, 32 (1), 54–81. doi: 10.1108/PAR-10-2018-0079 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fitrianto, A., & Musakkal, N. (2016). Panel data analysis for Sabah construction industries: Choosing the best model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 241–248. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00030-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghasemi, A., Rostami, V., & Mahdavirad, M. (2019). Intellectual capital, Tobin’s Q ratio and stock return. UCT Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 7 (1), 1–7. doi: 10.24200/jmas.vol7iss01pp1-7 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamdan, A. (2018). Intellectual capital and firm performance: Differentiating between accounting-based and market-based performance. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11 (1), 139–151. doi: 10.1108/IMEFM-02-2017-0053 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haq, A., Zhao, B., & Rehman, R. (2020). Corporate governance and firms performance: A case of India. SMART Journal of Business Management Studies, 16 (1), 73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hsieh, C., Ting, I., & Asif, J. (2020). The role of controlling shareholders in determining investments of intellectual capital among Taiwanese semiconductor companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21 (1), 62–86. doi: 10.1108/JIC-05-2019-0091 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ibrahimy, A., & Ramen, K. (2019). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance in Malaysia. UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance, 2 (1), 20–30. doi: 10.33736/uraf.1996.2019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ji, J., Talavera, O., & Yin, S. (2020). Frequencies of board meetings on various topics and corporate governance: evidence from China. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 54, 69–110. doi: 10.1007/s11156-018-00784-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kanojia, S., & Khanna, G. (2019). Women directors on corporate boards: Evidence for good governance. Corporate Governance Insight, 1(1), 26–52. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kao, M., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance, 19 (1), 189–216. doi: 10.1108/CG-04-2018-0144 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kiplagat, T. (2020). Does quality of corporate governance affect financial performance of listed firms in NSE, Kenya? African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 5 (4), 50–54. Retrieved from http://ajest.info/index.php/ajest/article/view/13 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kowalski, P., Buge, M., Sztajerowska, M., & Egeland, M. (2013). State-qwned enterprises:Trade effects and policy implications. Paris: OECD. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kweh, Q., Ahmad, N., & Ting, I. (2019). Board gender diversity, board independence and firm performance in Malaysia. Institutions and Economies, 11 (1), 1–20. Retrieved from https://ijie.um.edu.my/article/view/17017 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kweh, Q., Ting, I., & Hanh, L. (2019). Intellectual capital, governmental presence, and firm performance of publicly listed companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 16 (2), 193–211. doi: 10.1504/IJLIC.2019.098932 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Larkin, M. (2020). Board gender diversity, corporate reputation and market performance. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 9 (1), 1–26. Retrieved from http://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/ijbf/article/view/8446 [Google Scholar]
  33. Masulins, R., & Zhang, E. (2019). How valuable are independent directors? Evidence from external distractions. Journal of Financial Economics, 132 (3), 226–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayur, M., & Saravanan, P. (2017). Performance implications of board size, composition and activity: empirical evidence from the Indian banking sector. Corporate Governance, 17 (3), 466–489. doi: 10.1108/CG-03-2016-0058 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Merendino, A., & Melville, R. (2019). The board of directors and firm performance: empirical evidence from listed companies. Corporate Governance, 19 (3), 508–551. doi: 10.1108/CG-06-2018-0211 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mohamad, S., Pantamee, A., & Keong, O. (2020). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from listed Malaysian firms. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (2), 3668–3678. doi: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I2/PR200690 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Muslih, M., Sirait, D., & Simanjuntak, D. (2020). The effect of financing decisions and investment decisions on the performance of property companies, real estate, & building construction registered in Indonesia Stock Exchange moderated by corporate governance and risk management with firm size as control variable. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 22(3), 137–149. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mustapha, U., Rashid, N., & Bala, H. (2020). Corporate governance and financial performance of Nigeria listed banks. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12 (1), 5–11. doi: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12I1/20201002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nassar, S. (2018). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance of the Turkish real estate companies before and after the crisis. European Scientific Journal, 14 (1), 29–45. doi: 10.19044/esj.2018.v14n1p29 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nimtrakoon, S. (2015). The relationship between intellectual capital, firms’ market value and financial performance: Empirical evidence from the ASEAN. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16 (3), 587–618. doi: 10.1108/JIC-09-2014-0104 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Norzaiton, I., & Hafizah, S. (2019). Audit committee and financially distressed firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business, 4 (18), 92–107. Retrieved from http://www.ijafb.com/ [Google Scholar]
  42. Nwanne, T., & Okonkwo, E. (2019). Corporate Board Characteristics and Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) Performance in Nigeria for the period 2008-2017. Archives of Business Research, 7 (5), 75–95. doi: 10.14738/abr.75.6531 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Obermann, J., Velte, P., & Gerwanski, J. (2020). Mutualistic symbiosis? Combining theories of agency and stewardship through behavioral characteristics. Management Research Review, 1–23. doi: 10.1108/MRR-07-2019-0317 [Google Scholar]
  44. Oppong, G., Pattanayak, J., & Irfan, M. (2019). Impact of intellectual capital on productivity of insurance companies in Ghana: A panel data analysis with System GMM estimation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20 (6), 763–783. doi: 10.1108/JIC-12-2018-0220 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ousama, A., Hammami, H., & Abdulkarim, M. (2020). The association between intellectual capital and financial performance in the Islamic banking industry: An analysis of the GCC banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13 (1), 75–93. doi: 10.1108/IMEFM-05-2016-0073 [Google Scholar]
  46. Prado, A., Severiche, R., & Mendoza, A. (2020). Conditions of knowledge management, innovation capability and firm performance in Colombian NTBFs: A measurement scale. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 1–16. doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2019-0142 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pratama, B., Innayah, M., & Darmawan, A. (2019). The effect of intellectual capital towards firm financail performance: Study in high-tech firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. International Proceeding ASEAN YOUTH CONFERENCE 2018, 685–691. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3191123 [Google Scholar]
  48. Puni, A., & Anlesinya, A. (2020). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance in a developing country. International Journal of Law and Management, 1–23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2019-0076 [Google Scholar]
  49. Qudah, A., Azzam, M., & Aleqab, M. (2020). The impact of board of directors characteristics on banks performance: Evidence from Jordan. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23 (2), 1–12. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org [Google Scholar]
  50. Ramirez, Y., Soto, J., & Manzaneque, M. (2020). How does intellectual capital efficiency affect firm performance? The moderating role of family management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 1–28. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2019-0119 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rashid, M., & Pervin, R. (2019). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from listed banking institutions of Bangladesh. The Cost and Management, 47(1), 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rejeb, J., & Missaoui, I. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance: The case of Tunisian. Journal of Business & Financial Affairs, 8 (1), 1–7. doi: 10.4172/2167-0234.1000365 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rekha, H. (2019). Does gender diversity of boards affect performance? Evidence from Indian banking sector. IUP Journal of Bank Management, 18(2), 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  54. Salleh, N., Lee, C., & Joshi, P. (2019). Corporate governance, disclosure and firm performance: empirical findings from Malaysia. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9 (3), 269–290. doi: 10.1504/AAJFA.2019.100977 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Shachi, C., Jophi, J., & Prakash, M. (2020). Impact of intellectual capital on financial performance of banking and financial services sector: Comparative study. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(40), 770–786. [Google Scholar]
  56. Soei, C., Setiawan, A., & Fitriani, K. (2019). Maturity level of good corporate governance (GCG) principles implementation: Case study from micro and small enterprises in Bandung. In G. Ade, W. Isma, & U. Cep, Global competitiveness: Business transformation in the digital era (pp. 29-35). London: Taylor & Francis Group. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Song, H., Lee, S., & Kang, K. (2021). The influence of board interlocks on firm performance: In the context of geographic diversification in the restaurant industry. Tourism Management, 83, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104238 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Syajarul, I., & Shifa, N. (2019). Board diversity and firm performance in the construction, manufacturing, and trading/services industries. Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 12, 183–193. doi: 10.17576/AJAG-2019-12-15 [Google Scholar]
  59. Tan, S., & Patricia, R. (2020). Impact of corporate governance practices on firm performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (2), 909–916. doi: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I2/PR200399 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ting, I., Ren, C., & Chen, F. (2020). Interpreting the dynamic performance effect of intellectual capital through a value-added based perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1–21. doi: 10.1108/JIC-05-2019-0098 [Google Scholar]
  61. Tran, N., & Vo, D. (2020). Human capital efficiency and firm performance across sectors in an emerging market. Cogent Business & Management, 7 (1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1738832 [Google Scholar]
  62. Ullah, S., & Kamal, Y. (2020). Corporate governance, political connections and firm performance: The role of political regimes and size. Global Business Review, 1–23. doi: 10.1177/0972150919876520 [Google Scholar]
  63. Vaidya, P. (2019). Board size and firm performance: A study on BSE 100 companies. Journal of Management, 6 (3), 117–123. Retrieved from http://www.iaeme.com/JOM/index.asp [Google Scholar]
  64. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., & Rubino, M. (2020). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: an agency theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 27 (2), 1152–1163. doi: 10.1002/csr.1879 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wahid, A. (2019). The effects and the mechanisms of board gender diversity: Evidence from financial manipulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 705–725. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3785-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang, Y., Abbasi, K., & Babajide, B. (2020). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: evidence from the emerging market following the revised CG code. Corporate Governance, 20 (1), 158–174. doi: 10.1108/CG-07-2018-0244 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wijethilake, C., & Ekanayake, A. (2019). CEO duality and firm performance: the moderating roles of CEO informal power and board involvements. Social Responsibility Journal, 1–22. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-12-2018-0321 [Google Scholar]
  68. Xu, J., & Li, J. (2019). The impact of intellectual capital on SMEs’ performance in China. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20 (4), 488–509. doi: 10.1108/JIC-04-2018-0074 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ying, T., & Rayappan, P. (2020). Impact of corporate governance practices on firm performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (2), 909–916. doi: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I2/PR200399 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Younas, Z., Klein, C., & Trabert, T. (2019). Board composition and corporate risk-taking: a review of listed firms from Germany and the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Researc, 20 (4), 526–542. doi: 10.1108/JAAR-01-2018-0014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zabri, S., Ahmad, K., & Wah, K. (2016). Corporate governance practices and firm performance: Evidence from top 100 public listed companies in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 287–296. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00036-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.