Open Access
Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 128, 2021
XVII International Scientific and Practical Conference on Sustainable Development of Regions (IFSDR 2021)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01017 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Sustainable Development of Regions: Economic Aspect | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112801017 | |
Published online | 15 December 2021 |
- N. V. Zubarevich, Vliyanie pandemii na sociaTno-ekonomicheskoe razvitie i byudzhety regionov, Voprosy teoreticheskoj ekonomiki, 1(10), 48–60 (2021). Access mode: DOI 10.24411/2587-7666-2021-10104 [Google Scholar]
- V. V. Klimanov, Byudzhetnaya decentralizaciya v pandemiyu i postpandemijnyh usloviyah, Zhurnal Novoj ekonomicheskoj associacii, 3(51), 218–226 (2021). Access mode: DOI 10.31737/2221-2264-2021-51-3-11 [Google Scholar]
- E. A. Kolomak, Ekonomicheskie posledstviya COVID-19 dlya regionov Rossii, EKO, 12(558), 143–153 (2020). Access mode: DOI 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2020-12-143-153 [Google Scholar]
- M. Yu. Malkina, Ustojchivost regional’nyh ekonomik i ee faktory, Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii, 4, 397–403 (2021). Access mode: DOI 10.38197/2072-2060-2021-230-4-397-403 [Google Scholar]
- N. N. Miheeva, Ustojchivost’ rossijskih regionov k ekonomicheskim shokam, Problemy prognozirovaniya, 1(184), 106–118 (2021). Access mode: DOI 10.47711/0868-6351184-106-118 [Google Scholar]
- S. N. Rastvorceva, M. V. Snegur, A. S. Chencova, Modelirovanie investicionnoj privlekatel’nosti regiona, Nacional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’, 257, 39–44 (2014) [Google Scholar]
- K. Bender, B. Rohregger, B. Kinuthia, G. Ikua, E. Schüring, C. Adamba, K. Alatinga, N. Pouw, Different pathways of social protection reforms: An analysis of long-term institutional change in Kenya, World Development, 137, 105210 (2021). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.worlddev.2020.105210 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Boucekkine, F. Prieur, C. Vasilakis, B. Zou, Stochasticpetropolitics: The dynamics of institutions in resource-dependent economies, European Economic Review, 131, 103610 (2021). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/ieuroecorev.2020.103610 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Chang, Y. Chen, Informal institutions and comparative advantage of South-based MNEs: Theory and evidence, Journal of Development Economics, 148, 102566 (2021). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.ideveco.2020.102566 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Elango, K. Dhandapani, Does institutional industry context matter to performance? An extension of the institution-based view, Journal of Business Research, 115, 139–148 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.Org/10.1016/i.ibusres.2020.04.037 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Elizalde, On the economic effects of Indigenous institutions: Evidence from Mexico, Journal of Development Economics, 147, 102530 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.ideveco.2020.102530 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Fu, Do economic institutions matter for trade liberalization? Evidence from China’s Open Door Policy, Research in International Business and Finance, 55, 101330 (2021). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.ribaf.2020.101330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Heavilin, H. Songur, Institutional distance and Turkey’s outward foreign direct investment, Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101299 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.ribaf.2020.101299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Kolomak, Economic effects of pandemic-related restrictions in Russia and their spatial heterogeneity, R-Economy, 6 (3), 154–161 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Nedic, D. Despotovic, S. Cvetanovic, T. Djukic, D. Petrovic, Institutional reforms for economic growth in the Western Balkan countries, Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(5), 933–952 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.ipolmod.2020.04.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Nyame-Asiamah, I. Oduro Amoako, J. Amankwah-Amoah, Y. Debrah, Diaspora entrepreneurs’ push and pull institutional factors for investing in Africa: Insights from African returnees from the United Kingdom, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119876 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.techfore.2019.119876 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Rodriguez-Pose, M. Zhang, The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119937 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.techfore.2020.119937 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Sanderink, N. Nasiritousi, How institutional interactions can strengthen effectiveness: The case of multi-stakeholder partnerships for renewable energy, Energy Policy, 141, 111447 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.enpol.2020.111447 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Veiga, P. Teixeira, R. Figueiredo, C. Fernandes, Entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness: A public institution love triangle, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, 100863 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.seps.2020.100863 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Wang, H. Chung, Business networking and innovation of Asian enterprises in Western countries: The moderation of institutional distance, Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 152–162 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.indmarman.2020.05.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Wang, W. Huang, Centrality-based measures of financial institutions’ systemic importance: A tail dependence network view, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 562, 125345 (2021). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.physa.2020.125345 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Winch, Maytorena-Sanchez E., Institutional projects and contradictory logics: Responding to complexity in institutional field change, International Journal of Proiect Management, 38(6), 368–378 (2020). Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1016/i.iiproman.2020.08.004 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.