Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 02014
Number of page(s) 9
Section Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112902014
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Bažant, M. (2009). Řešení vybraných provozních problémů osobní železniční stanice v rámci simulačního modelu. Univerzita Pardubice, Dopravní Fakulta Jana Pernera. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brožová, H., Šubrt, T., & Houška, M. (2003). Modely pro vícekriteriální rozhodování. Credit. Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Katedra operační a systémové analýzy. [Google Scholar]
  3. Büyüközkan, G., & Güleryüz, S. (2016). Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Approach for Smart Phone Selection Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9(4), 709–725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang, C.-W., Hsiao, H.-Y., Tang, C.-H., Chuang, Y.-J., & Lin, C.-Y. (2010). Design-Based Guidelines for the Semantic Perception of Emergency Signs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(1), 21–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Datart. (2021). https://www.datart.cz/ [Google Scholar]
  6. Fiala, P. (2008). Modely a metody rozhodování. Oeconomica, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, & Fakulta informatiky a statistiky. [Google Scholar]
  7. Han, S. H., Kim, K. J., Yun, M. H., Hong, S. W., & Kim, J. (2004). Identifying mobile phone design features critical to user satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14(1), 15–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heureka. (2021). Heureka—Mobilní telefony. https://mobilni-telefony.heureka.cz/samsung-galaxy-a42-a426b-5g-6gb-128gb-dual-sim/ [Google Scholar]
  9. Işıklar, G., & Büyüközkan, G. (2007). Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 29(2), 265–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee, Y. S., Hong, S. W., Smith-Jackson, T. L., Nussbaum, M. A., & Tomioka, K. (2006). Systematic evaluation methodology for cell phone user interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 18(2), 304–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lysonski, S., Durvasula, S., & Zotos, Y. (1996). Consumer decision‐making styles: A multi‐country investigation. European Journal of Marketing, 30(12), 10–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mourtzis, D., Doukas, M., & Vandera, C. (2017). Smart mobile apps for supporting product design and decision-making in the era of mass customisation. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30(7), 690–707. [Google Scholar]
  13. Plos, O., & Buisine, S. (2006). Universal design for mobile phones: A case study. CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’06, 1229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stankevich, A. (2017). Explaining the Consumer Decision-Making Process: Critical Literature Review. Journal of international business research and marketing, 2(6), 7–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zapletal, F. (2020). On Importance of Performance Values for Preference Degrees in PROMETHEE . 38th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics, 662–668. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.