Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 08013
Number of page(s) 11
Section Regional Economics, Economic and Human Geography
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Commission of the European Communities. (2009). Concerning the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2009) 248 final. [Google Scholar]
  2. Directive 2014/89/EU. Establishing a framework for Maritime Spatial Planning. European Parliament, Council. [Google Scholar]
  3. Directive 2008/56/EC. Marine Strategy Framework Directive. European Parliament, Council. [Google Scholar]
  4. ESPON. (2020). Maritime spatial planning and land-sea interactions. Policy Brief. [Google Scholar]
  5. European Commission. (2017). Maritime Spatial Planning: Addressing Land-Sea Interaction. A briefing paper. [Google Scholar]
  6. European MSP Platform. (n.d.). MSP in the EU. Countries. [Google Scholar]
  7. Frederiksen, P., Morf, A., von Thenen, M., Armoskaite, A., Luhtala, H., Schiele, K.S., Strake, S., & Hansen, H.S. (2021). Proposing an ecosystem-services based framework to assess sustainability impacts of maritime spatial plans (MSP-SA). Ocean and Coastal Management, 208, Article 105577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones, P.J.S., Lieberknecht, L.M., & Qiu, W. (2016). Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Marine Policy, 71, 256–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kidd, S., Jay, S., Robinson, L., Shaw, D., Jones, H., Pascual, M., Zonta, D., de Vet, J.M., Abhold, K., Kruger, I., McGlade, K., Malak, D.A., & Sanchez, A. (2020). ESPON. MSP-LSI – Maritime Spatial Planning and Land-Sea Interactions. Targeted Analysis. Final Report. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kidd, S., Jones, H. & Jay, S. (2019). Taking Account of Land-Sea Interactions in Marine Spatial Planning. In J. Zaucha, & K. Gee (Eds.), Maritime Spatial Planning: Past, Present, Future (pp. 245–270). Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Long, R.D., Charles, A., & Stephenson, R.L. (2015). Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management. Marine Policy, 57, 53–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia. (2019). Guidelines for Planning Marine Coastal Waters and the Adjacent Land Areas at the Local Level. Pan Baltic Scope. [Google Scholar]
  13. Morf, A. (ed.), Cedergren, E., Gee, K., Kull, M., & Eliasen, S. (2019). Lessons, stories and ideas on how to integrate Land-Sea Interactions into MSP. Nordregio. Pan Baltic Scope. [Google Scholar]
  14. O’Hagan, A.M., Paterson, S., & Le Tissier, M. (2021). Addressing the tangled web of governance mechanisms for land-sea interactions: Assessing implementation challenges across scales. Marine Policy, 112, Article 103715. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pyc, D. (2019). Implementation of marine spatial planning instruments for sustainable marine governance in Poland. TransNav, 13(2), 311–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Piwowarczyk, J., Gee, K., Gilek, M., Hassler, B., Luttmann, A., Maack, L., Matczak, M., Morf, A., Saunders, F., Stalmokaite, I., & Zaucha, J. (2019). Insights into integration challenges in the Baltic Sea Region marine spatial planning: Implications for the HELCOM-VASAB principles. Ocean and Coastal Management, 175, 98–109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Saunders, F., Gilek, M., Ikauniece, A., Tafon, R.V., Gee, K., & Zaucha, J. (2020). Theorizing social sustainability and justice in marine spatial planning: democracy, diversity, and equity. Sustainability, 12, 2560. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schlüter, A., Van Assche, K., Horindge, A.-K., & Vaidianu, N. (2020). Land-sea interactions and coastal development: An evolutionary governance perspective. Marine Policy, 112, Article 103801. [Google Scholar]
  19. Soininen, N., & Hassan, D. (2019). Marine spatial planning and the new frontiers of marine governance. In D. Hassan, & S. Karim (Eds.), International Marine Environmental Law and Policy (pp. 101–120). Routledge. ISBN: 9781138651135 [Google Scholar]
  20. Stelzenmüller, V., Cormier, R., Gee, K., Shucksmith, R., Gubbins, M., Yates, K. L., Morf, A., Nic Aonghusa, C., Mikkelsen, E., Tweddle, J.F., Pecceu, E., Kannen, A., & Clarke, S.A. (2021). Evaluation of marine spatial planning requires fit for purpose monitoring strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 278(2), Article 111545. [Google Scholar]
  21. UN Committee of Experts on Public Administration. (2019). Report on the eighteenth session (8–12 April 2019). E/2019/44-E/C.16/2019/8. [Google Scholar]
  22. UN Economic and Social Council. (2018). Principles of effective governance for sustainable development. E/2018/44-E/C.16/2018/8, para. 31. Supplement No. 24. [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Assche, K., Hornidge, A.-K., Schlüter, A., & Vaidianu, N. (2020). Governance and the coastal condition: Towards new modes of observation, adaptation and integration. Marine Policy, 112, Article 103413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. VASAB Secretariat. (2021a, July 15). 4th Baltic MSP Forum. Workshop 6: Land-sea Interactions and Values of Local Community [Video]. YouTube. [Google Scholar]
  25. VASAB Secretariat. (2021b, July 15). 4th Baltic MSP Forum. Workshop 7: Multi-level governance for the coast and the sea – the new normal? [Video]. YouTube. [Google Scholar]
  26. VASAB Secretariat. (2021c, July 13). 4th Baltic MSP Forum – Panel Discussion on Regional Frameworks [Video]. YouTube. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zaucha, J. (2014). Sea basin maritime spatial planning: A case study of the Baltic Sea region and Poland. Marine Policy, 50, 34–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.