Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 10015
Number of page(s) 10
Section International Relations and Globalization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112910015
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Alifanoviene, D., Sapelyte, O., & Gerulaitis, D. (2018). Reconstruction of the context of coping with occupational stress experienced by specialists of social welfare professions in socially and culturally diverse environment. Social welfare: interdisciplinary approach, 2(8), 68-78. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso-Tapia, J., Rodríguez-Rey, R., Garrido-Hernansaiz, H., Ruiz, M., & Nieto, C. (2019). Coping, personality and resilience: Prediction of subjective resilience from coping strategies and protective personality factors. Behavioral Psychology/Psicologia Conductual, 27(3), 375-389. [Google Scholar]
  3. Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1984). Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(4), 877-891. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brew, F. P., & Cairns, D. R. (2004). Do culture or situational constraints determine choice of direct or indirect styles in intercultural workplace conflicts?. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28(5), 331-352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, K. K., Bormann, C. A., Cropanzano, R. S., & James, K. (1995). Validation evidence for three coping measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(3), 434-455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher, D. M., & Law, R. D. (2021). How to choose a measure of resilience: An organizing framework for resilience measurement. Applied Psychology, 70(2), 643-673. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harvey, M., Speier, C., & Novecevic, M. M. (2001). A theory-based framework for strategic global human resource staffing policies and practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(6), 898-915. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hogg, M. A. (2021). Self-uncertainty and group identification: Consequences for social identity, group behavior, intergroup relations, and society. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 263-316). Academic Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, G. M. (1992). Communication adaptability and interaction involvement as predictors of cross-cultural adjustment. Communication Research Reports, 9(1), 33-41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Khurtenko, O., Bereziak, K., Khavula, R., Vdovichenko, O., Onishchenko, N., & Liebiedieva, S. (2020). Psychological Analysis of Occupational Conditions in Extreme Environments and the Structure of Non-Standard Situations. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 11(4), 132-148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koch, A., Yzerbyt, V., Abele, A., Ellemers, N., & Fiske, S. T. (2021). Social evaluation: Comparing models across interpersonal, intragroup, intergroup, several-group, and many-group contexts. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 1–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tremolada, M., Bonichini, S., & Taverna, L. (2016). Coping strategies and perceived support in adolescents and young adults: predictive model of self-reported cognitive and mood problems. Psychology, 7(14), 1858. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rasskazova E.I. (2013). Koping-strategii v strukture deyatel'nosti i samoregulyacii:psihometricheskie harakteristiki i vozmozhnosti primeneniya metodiki cope [Coping strategies in the structure of activity and self-regulation: psychometric characteristics and the possibility of applying the technique]. Psihologiya. Zhurnal VSh`E - Psychology. HSE Journal/ Vol. 10 (1), 82–118. [In Russian]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Weigl, K., & Ponocny, I. (2020). Group Sequential Designs Applied in Psychological Research. Methodology, 16(1), 75-91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.