Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 130, 2021
IMPEC 2020 : Les sensorialités - Interactions Multimodales Par Écran
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 12
Section Partie 2 : avatars – réalité virtuelle – contexte pédagogique
Published online 15 December 2021
  1. Baines Lawrence. (2008). A teacher’s guide to multisensory learning: Improving literacy by engaging the senses, Virginia, USA: ASCD. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bezemer Jeff, and Gunther Kress. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written communication 25, no. 2, p. 166–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blomert Leo, and Dries Froyen. (2010). Multi-sensory learning and learning to read. International journal of psychophysiology 77, no. 3, p. 195–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fleckenstein Kristie S. (1996). Images, words, and narrative epistemology. College English 58, no. 8, p. 914–933. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamilton Mary, Rachel Heydon, Kathryn Hibbert, and Roz Stooke (éd.). (2015). Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality, London: Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  6. James Karin H., Sophia Vinci. Booher, and Felipe Munoz-Rubke. (2017). The impact of multimodal-multisensory learning on human performance and brain activation patterns. In Sharon Oviatt, Björn Schuller, Philip Cohen, Daniel Sonntag, Gerasimos Potamianos (éd.), The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces Volume 1. Morgan & Claypool. Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkins Henry. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture. London and New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkins Henry. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York and London: New York University Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jenkins Henry. (2010). Transmedia education: The seven principles revisited. Confessions of an Aca-Fan., accessed on 15/11/2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kress Gunther R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kress Gunther R. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge: London. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kress Gunther, Carey Jewitt, Jon Ogborn, and Charalampos Tsatsarelis. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London and New York: Continuum. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kristeva, Julia. (1980) Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Leon S. Roudiez (éd.), T. Gora et al. (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Livingstone Sonia. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The communication review 7, no. 1, p. 3–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lotman Yuri M. (1990). Universe of the Mind. A semiotic theory of culture. London: IB Taurus. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lotman Yuri M. (1992). Fenomen kultury [The phenomenon of culture]. In: Lotman, Y. (éd.), Izbrannye statji v trekh tomakh. T.I Statji po semiotike i topologii kultury. Tallinn: Aleksandra, p. 34–45 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lotman Yuri M. (2000). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lotman Yuri M. (2009). Culture and Explosion. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lotman Juri M., Boris A. Uspenskij, Vjacheslav V. Ivanov, Vladimir N. Toporov, and Aleksandr M. Pjatigorskij. (1973). Theses on the semiotic study of cultures (as applied to Slavic texts). Structure of Texts and Semiotics of Culture. The Hague, Paris: Mouton, p. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  20. Murray Micah M., Antonia Thelen, Gregor Thut, Vincenzo Romei, Roberto Martuzzi, and Pawel J. Matusz. (2016). The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. Neuropsychologia 83, p. 161–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ojamaa Maarja, Peeter Torop, Alexandr Fadeev, Alexandra Milyakina, Tatjana Pilipovec, and Merit Rickberg. (2019). Culture as education: From transmediality to transdisciplinary pedagogy. Sign Systems Studies 47, no. 1/2, p. 152–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ojamaa Maarja, Peeter Torop. (2015). Transmediality of cultural autocommunication. International Journal of Cultural Studies 18, no. 1, p. 61–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Popovic Anton.(1976). Aspects of Metatext. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 3: 225–235. [Google Scholar]
  24. Scolari Carlos A., Maria-José Masanet, Mar Guerrero-Pico, and María-José Establés. (2018). Transmedia literacy in the new media ecology: Teens’ transmedia skills and informal learning strategies. El profesional de la información (EPI) 27, no. 4, p. 801–812. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shams Ladan, and Aaron R. Seitz. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in cognitive sciences 12, no. 11, p. 411–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sukovic Suzana. (2016). Transliteracy in complex information environments. Chandos Publishing. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.