EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 130 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 130 (2021) 03001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 130, 2021
IMPEC 2020 : Les sensorialités - Interactions Multimodales Par Écran
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Partie 3 : visualité écranique – média social – ressources textuelles et visuelles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202113003001
Published online 15 December 2021
  1. Ahmed Sara. (2007). A phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist Theory, 8, 149–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbosa Gadelha. Kaciano. (2016). The Persistence of Desire: Gay Men Online and Queer Visuality. Arte y Políticas de Identidad, vol. 15, n° 15, p. 59–72. [http://search.proquest.com/docview/1920222431/] [Google Scholar]
  3. Batiste Dominique. (2013). ‘O Feet Away’: The Queer Cartography of French Gay Men’s Geo-social Media Use. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, vol. 22, n° 2, p. 111–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergström Marie. (2016). (Se) correspondre en ligne: L’homogamie à l’épreuve des sites de rencontres. Sociétés contemporaines, vol. 104, n°4, p. 13–40. doi: 10.3917/soco.104.0013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bibié-Émerit Laetitia. (2016). La notion de lieu de corpus: un nouvel outil pour l’étude des terrains numériques en linguistique, Corela, vol. 14, n° 1 [http://corela.revues.org/4594] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blackwell Courtney, Birnholtz Jeremy, Abbott Charles. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app,.Vetr Media and Society, vol. 17, n°7, p. 1117–1136. doi: 10.1177/1461444814521595 [Google Scholar]
  7. Broqua Christophe. (2018). La « communauté homosexuelle » comme peuple transnational: Une fiction politique. L’Homme & la Société, vol. 208, n° 3, p. 143–167. doi: 10.3917/lhs.208.0143. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bryant Kelly M, Soria, Krista M. (2015). College students’ sexual orientation, gender identity, and participation in Study Abroad. Frontiers: The interdisciplinary journal of study abroad, vol. 25, p. 91–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cascalheira Cory, Smith Brandt. (2019). Hierarchy of desire: partner preferences and social identities of men who have sex with men on geosocial networks. Sexuality & Culture, vol. 24, n°3, pp. 630–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09653-z [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins Rodney. (2012). Efféminés, Gigolos, and MSMs in the Cyber-Networks, Coffeehouses, and ‘Secret Gardens’ of Contemporary Tunis. Journal of Middle East Women ‘s Studies, vol. 8, n° 3, p. 89–112. [Google Scholar]
  11. Develotte Christine. (2006). Décrire l’espace d’exposition discursive dans un campus numérique. Le Français dans le monde. Recherches et applications, p. 88–100. [Google Scholar]
  12. Diminescu Dana. (2008). The connected migrant: an epistemological manifesto. Social Science Information, vol. 47, n° 4, p. 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018408096447 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Diminescu Dana, Loveluck Benjamin. (2014). Traces of dispersion. Online media and diasporic identities. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, vol. 5, n° 1, p. 23–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duff Patricia. (2008). Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics, New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  15. Duvoux Nicolas. (2017). Les inégalités sociales, Paris: PUF. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eid Paul. (2018). Les majorités nationales ont-elles une couleur ? Réflexions sur l’utilité de la catégorie de « blanchité » pour la sociologie du racisme. Sociologie et sociétés, vol. 50, n° 2, p. 125–149. https://doi.org/10.7202/1066816ar [Google Scholar]
  17. El-Tayeb Fatima. (2012). “Gays who cannot properly be gay”: Queer Muslims in the neoliberal European city. European Journal of Women ‘s Studies, vol. 19, n° 1, p. 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506811426388 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fox Jessie, Warber, Katie M. (2015). Queer identity management and political self-expression on social networking sites: A co-cultural approach to the spiral of silence. Journal of Communication, vol. 65, n°1, p. 79–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gray John, Baynham Mike. (2020). Narratives of Queer Migration. In Hall, K. and Barrett, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. Oxford University Press. [non paginé] [Google Scholar]
  20. Green, Adam Isaiah. (2013). “Erotic Capital and the Power of Desirability: Why “Honey Money” is a Bad Collective Strategy for Remedying Gender Inequality.” Sexualities, p. 16:137–158 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guichon Nicolas. (2020). L’étudiant international: figure de l’individu mobile et connecté, Le Français dans le Monde - Recherches et applications, n°68, pp. 158–169. [Google Scholar]
  22. Guillaumin Colette. (1992). Une société en ordre. De quelques-unes des formes de l’idéologie raciste, Sociologie et sociétés, vol. 24, n° 2, p. 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hobbs Mitchell, Owen Stephen, Gerber Livia. (2017). Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology, vol. 53, n° 2, p. 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783316662718 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hutchby Ian. (2014). Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 72(C), 86–89. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones Rodney. (2011). Dancing, skating and sex: Action and text in the digital age. Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 6, n° 3, p. 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v6i3.283 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jones Rodney. (2018). Mediated discourse analysis in language and sexuality research. In Hall, K. and Barrett, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. Oxford University Press. [non paginé] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. King Russell, Raghuram, Parvati. (2013). International Student Migration: Mapping the Field and New Research Agendas. Population, Space and Place, vol. 19, n° 2, p. 127–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lardellier Pascal. (2012). « Le Online Dating, au coeur de la communication électronique », Netcom, vol. 26, n° 1 & 2, p. 77–96. [http://joumals.openedition.org/netcom/593] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Leurs Koen, Prabhakar Madhuri. (2018). Doing Digital Migration Studies: Methodological Considerations for an Emerging Research Focus. In Zapata-Barrero, Ricard, Yalaz, Evren (eds.), Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies, IMISCOE Research Series, p. 247–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Licoppe, Christian. (2016). Mobilités et rencontres dans les espaces publics urbains à l’âge des médias positionnels: Coutures, plis et rencontres avec des « inconnus pseudonymes ». Réseaux, vol. 200, n° 6, p. 117–143. doi: 10.3917/res.200.0117. [Google Scholar]
  31. Licoppe Christian, Rivière, Carole Anne, Morel Julien. (2016). Grindr casual hook-ups as interactional achievements. New Media & Society, vol. 18, n° 11, p. 2540–2558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815589702 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Madianou Mirca, Miller Daniel. (2012). Migration and new media transnational families and polymedia. Londres: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mowlabocus, Sharif. (2020). A kindr Grindr. Moderating race(-ism) in technospaces of desire. Lille: Conférence plénière au colloque Mediasex. [Google Scholar]
  34. Patterson Jeffrey, Leurs Koen. (2019). “We Live Here, and We Are Queer!” Young Adult Gay Connected Migrants’ Transnational Ties and Integration in the Netherlands. Media and Communication, vol. 7, n° 1, p. 90–101. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1686 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Paveau Marie. Anne. (2017). L’analyse du discours numérique. Paris, Hermann éditeurs. [Google Scholar]
  36. Provencher Denis M., Peterson, David. (2020). Diasporic Sexual Citizenship: Queer Language, (Im)Possible Subjects, and Transfiliation. In Hall, K. and Barrett, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. Oxford University Press. [non paginé] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shield Andrew. (2017). New in town: Gay immigrants and geosocial dating apps. In A. Dhoest, L. Szulc, & B. Eeckhout (Eds.), LGBTQs, media, and culture in Europe: Situated case studies. London: Routledge, p. 244–261. [Google Scholar]
  38. Shield Andrew. (2018). “Grindr Culture: Intersectional and Socio-Sexual.” Ephemera: theory & politics in organization, vol. 18, n° 1, p. 149–161. http://search.proquest.com/docview/2059598831/ [Google Scholar]
  39. Trawalé Damien. (2016). La reproduction sans encombre des rapports de race: le cas des gays noirs. Migrations Société, vol. 163, n° 1, p. 61–74. doi: 10.3917/migra.163.0061. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vörös Florian. (2018). Fantasmes de virilité, blanchité et masculinité hégémonique en contexte gai parisien. L’Homme & la Société, vol. 208, n° 3, p. 197–222. 10.3917/lhs.208.0197 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.