Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 131, 2022
8th International Multidisciplinary Research Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 10
Section Health
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213102006
Published online 11 January 2022
  1. J. Burch, Compounding Pharmacists Provide Customized Care. North Carolina Medical Journal 78(3), 191–194 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Staubach, S. Salzmann, A. Peveling-Oberhag. Extemporaneous formulations in Germany - relevance for everyday clinical practice. Journal der Deutschen-Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (Journal of the German Society of Dermatology) 16(5), 566–574 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Aquilina. The extemporaneous compounding of paediatric medicines at Mater Dei Hospital. Journal of the Malta College of Pharmacy Practice 19, 28–30 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Dubins, A. Laschuk, C. Ho. Extemporaneous Compounding in Pharmacy Practice. In: Encyclopedia of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy, 418–451 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Kiselova, B. Maurma, V. Šidlovska, J. Zvejnieks. The Extent of Extemporaneous Preparation and Regulatory Framework of Extemporaneous Compounding in Latvia. Medicina 55(9), 531 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Prince, J. Lundevall. A growing codependency: compounding pharmacy and safety. International journal of pharmaceutical compounding 17(6), 485–489 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. K.W. Fent, S. Durgam, C. Mueller. Pharmaceutical Dust Exposure at Pharmacies Using Automatic Dispensing Machines: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 11(11), 695–705 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Inaba, A. Hioki, Y. Kondo, H. Nakamura, M. Nakamura. Suspended particle and drug ingredient concentrations in hospital dispensaries and implications for pharmacists’ working environments. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 21(2), 105–110 (2015b) [Google Scholar]
  9. O.G. Bhusnure, R.B. Dongare, S.B. Gholve, P.S. Giram. Chemical hazards and safety management in pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Pharmacy Research 12(3), 357369 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Inaba, A. Hioki, Y. Kondo, H. Nakamura, M. Nakamura. Prevalence of subjective symptoms among hospital pharmacists and association with drug compounding practices. Industrial health 53(1), 100–108 (2015a) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Oddone, S. Negri, F. Morandi, M. Imbriani. Pharmaceutical Industries Air Quality. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry 73, 589–621 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Ruhm, J. Breckow, G. Dietze, A. Friedl, R. Greinert, P. Jacob, S. Kistinger, R. Michel, W. Mueller, H. Otten, C. Streffer, W. Weiss. Dose limits for occupational exposure to ionising radiation and genotoxic carcinogens: a German perspective. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 59(1), 9–27 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Brambilla, F. Mattioli, L. Robbiano, A. Martelli. Update of carcinogenicity studies in animals and humans of 535 marketed pharmaceuticals. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 750(1), 1–51 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. N.B. Hopf, C. Bolognesi, B. Danuser, P. Wild. Biological monitoring of workers exposed to carcinogens using the buccal micronucleus approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 781, 11–29 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-161/pdfs/2016-161.pdf7id10.26616/NIOSHPUB2016161 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. T.N. Hanvold, P. Kines, M. Nykänen, S. Thomée, K. Holte, J. Vuori, M. Worsted, K.B. Veiersted. Occupational safety and health among young workers in the Nordic countries: A systematic literature review. Safety and Health at Work 10(1), 3–20 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  17. S.B. Marahatta, S. Gautam, G. Paudel, U. Yadav. Awareness of occupational hazards and associated factors among automobile repair artisans in Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal. Indian Journal of Occupational and EnvironmentalMedicine 22(1), 49–53 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Apatsidou, I. Konstantopoulou, E. Foufa, K. Tsarouhas, P. Papalexis, R. Rezaee, D. Spandidos, D. Kouretas, C. Tsitsimpikou C. Safe use of chemicals by professionalusers and health care specialists. Biomedical Reports 8(2), 160–165 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. R.J. Willey. International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology Understanding a safety data sheet (SDS) in regards to process safety. Procedia Engineering 45, 857–867 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. K.W. Fent, S. Durgam, M. Methner. CDC (Center of Disease Control and Prevention). Evaluation of pharmaceutical dust exposure at an outpatient pharmacy, Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports/pdfs/2010-0078-3177.pdf (2013) [Google Scholar]
  21. M.S. Sharifzadeh, C.A. Damalas, G. Abdollahzadeh. Perceived usefulness of personal protective equipment in pesticide use predicts farmers’ willingness to use it. Science of The Total Environment 609, 517–523 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Champmartin, F. Clerc. Inhalable Dust Measurements as a First Approach to Assessing Occupational Exposure in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 11(2), 85–92 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  23. C.C. Jung, P.C. Wu, C.H. Tseng, H.J. Su. Indoor air quality varies with ventilation types and working areas in hospitals. Building and Environment 85, 190–195 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. C.Y. Hon, K. Teschke, W. Chu, P. Demers, S. Venners. Antineoplastic Drug Contamination of Surfaces Throughout the Hospital Medication System in Canadian Hospitals. Journal ofOccupational and Environmental Hygiene 10(7), 374–383 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. C.Y. Hon, K. Teschke, W. Chu, P. Demers, S. Venners. Antineoplastic Drug Contamination on the Hands of Employees Working Throughout the Hospital Medication System. The Annals ofOccupational Hygiene 58(6), 761–770 (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.