Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2022
14th Session of Euro-Asian Law Congress “The value of law” 2021
Article Number 00144
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 09 February 2022
  1. C. Udrea, Pedagogical Strategies for Continuous Training in the Police System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 142. 597–602. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.L. Bianco, Ideologies of sign language and their repercussions in language policy determinations. Language & Communication. Volume 75, 83–93. (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C.K.M. Lee, K.H. Ngs Kam, C.-H. Chen, H.C.W. Lau, S.Y. Chunga, T. Tsoi, American sign language recognition and training method with recurrent neural network. Expert Systems with Applications. Volume 167. (2021). Retrieved from: [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Wangchuk, P. Riyamongkol, R. Waranusast Realtime Bhutanese Sign Language digits recognition system using Convolutional Neural Network. ICT Express. (2020). Retrieved from: [Google Scholar]
  5. R. McKee, D. McKee, Globalization, hybridity, and vitality in the linguistic ideologies of New Zealand Sign Language users. Language & Communication. Volume 74, 164–181. (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Braithwaite, Ideologies of linguistic research on small sign languages in the global South: A Caribbean perspective. Language & Communication. Volume 74, 182–194. (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Adithy, R. Rajesh, Hand gestures for emergency situations: A video dataset based on words from Indian sign language. Data in Brief. Volume 31, 106016. (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Motamedi, M. Schouwstra, K. Smith, J. Culbertson, S. Kirby Evolving artificial sign languages in the lab: From improvised gesture to systematic sign. Cognition. Volume 192. 103964. (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Emmorey, R. Bosworth, T. Kraljic, Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language. Journal of Memory and Language. Volume 61, Issue 3. 398–411. (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Gameiro, T. Cardoso, Y. Rybarczyk, Kinect-Sign, Teaching Sign Language to “Listeners” through a Game. Procedia Technology. Volume 17. 384–391. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Rojas-Murillo, A.B. Pancho, M.J. Cariaso, A. Speicher, Mato, A., Segal, O. (2021). Visual learning curves for American sign language (ASL) alphabet. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. Volume 81. 103027 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Bailey, P. Kaarto, J. Burkey, D. Bright, M. Sohn, Evaluation of an American Sign Language co-curricular training for pharmacy students. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. Volume 13, Issue 1. 68–72. (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Langer, Modern Trends in the Teaching the Vocabulary of Czech Sign Language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 55. 635644. (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Vinsona, R.L. Thompson, R. Skinner, G. Vigliocco, A faster path between meaning and form? Iconicity facilitates sign recognition and production in British Sign Language. Journal of Memory and Language. Volume 82. 56–85. (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Q. Deng, F. Gua, S.X. Tong, Lexical processing in sign language: A visual mismatch negativity study. Neuropsychologia. Volume 148. 107629. (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.