Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 144, 2022
2022 International Conference on Science and Technology Ethics and Human Future (STEHF 2022)
Article Number 02012
Number of page(s) 6
Section Mobile Communication Technology and Prospects of Frontier Technology
Published online 26 August 2022
  1. Gad—el-HaL Flow Contr01. Cambridge: The University of Cambridge, 2000, 104-105 [Google Scholar]
  2. Lake J, King P, Rivir R. Reduction of separation losses on a turbine blade with low Reynolds numbers[C] // Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradshaw P. Turbulence modeling with application to turbomachinery[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yang Lin, Zou Zhengping, Ning Fangfei, et al Numerical simulation of boundary layer transition [J] Journal of Aeronautical power, 2005, 20 (3): 6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Mayle R. The role of laminar-turbulenttransition in gas turbine engines[C]. 1991. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schlichting H, Gersten K, Krause E, etal. Boundary—layer theory[M]. Springer, 1955. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilbert, N. Kleiser, L. 1990, Near-wall phenomena in transition to turbulence. In near-wall turbulence: 1988 Zoran Zaric Wea Conf., Ed S.J. Kline, N.H. Afgan, pp 7—27, Washington, DC: Hemisphere. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim J, Moin P, Moser RD. 1987. Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech 177: 133—66 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Orkwis PD, George JH. A comparison of CGSP preconditioning methods for Newton’s method solvers. AIAA Paper, 9-33327, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  10. Sonneveld P.CGS, A fast Lanczos-type solver for nonlinear systems. SIAM Journal of scientific statistics and computing, 1987, 10; 350-356 [Google Scholar]
  11. Saad Y, Schultz MH. GMRES, A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM Journal of scientific statistics and computing, 1986, 7; 856-869 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones W P, Launder B. The calculation of lowReynolds—number phenomena with a two— equation model of turbulence[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 1973, 16(6): 1119-1130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schmidt R C, Patankar S V Two-Equation LowReynolds. Number Turbulence Modeling of Transitional Boundary Layer Flows Characteristic of Gas Turbine Blades. Ph. D. Thesis. Final Contractor Report[J]. 1988. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dhawan S J, Narasimha R. Some properties of boundary layer flow during the transition from laminar to turbulent motion [J], Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1958, 3(4): 418-436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Malan P, Suluksna K, Juntasaro E. Calibrating the yRe0 transition model for colmnercial CFD[C]. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  16. You J Y, Kwon O J, Blending of SAS and correlation—based transition models for flow simulation at supercritical Reynolds numbers [J]. Computers & Fluids. 2013, 80: 63—70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solver, parameter vector, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics. 1981, 433; 357-372. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ning Fangfei, Xu Liping GMRES algorithm in twodimensional steady turbulence calculation [J] Journal of mechanics, 2001 (04): 442-451 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ning, F., and L. Xu. “Numerical Investigation of Transonic Compressor Rotor Flow Using an Implicit 3D Flow Solver with One-Equation Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model.” Asme Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, & Air 2001. [Google Scholar]
  20. BJ Abu-Ghannam, and R Shaw. “Natural Transition of Boundary Layers—The Effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient, and Flow History.” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science (2006). [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang Jinlong, Two transition models for Reynolds time averaged simulation and flow prediction [D] East China University of technology, 2014 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.