EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 147 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 147 (2022) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 147, 2022
SCAN’22 - 10e Séminaire de Conception Architecturale Numérique
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Cloud Computing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214701003
Published online 12 October 2022
  1. J. Estdale and E. Georgiadou, Applying the ISO/IEC 25010 quality models to software product, pp. 492–503 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Pulkka, M. Ristimäki, K. Rajakallio, and S. Junnila, Applicability and benefits of the ecosystem concept in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 34, no. 2, pp. 129–144 (2016) DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1179773. [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Manikas and K. M. Hansen. Software ecosystems - A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 86, no. 5, pp. 1294–1306 (2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.026. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Jansen, A. Finkelstein, and S. Brinkkemper. A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems. in 2009 31st International Conference on Software Engineering - Companion Volume, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 187–190 (2009) DOI: 10.1109/ICSE-COMPANION.2009.5070978. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Szyperski and D. G. Messerschmitt. Software Ecosystem: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry. Cambridge; Ipswich: MIT Press; Ebsco Publishing [distributor. Accessed: Mar. 22, 2022 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac7bknumbeF6267307 [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Bosch and P. Bosch-Sijtsema. From integration to composition: On the impact of software product lines, global development and ecosystems. Journal of Systems and Software, 83, no. 1, pp. 67–76 (2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. R. J. Campbell and F. Ahmed. A three-dimensional view of software ecosystems. in Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture Companion Volume - ECSA ‘10, Copenhagen, Denmark, p. 81 (2010) DOI: 10.1145/1842752.1842774. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J.-C. Bignon. Modélisation, simulation and assistance à la conception-construction en architecture. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Henri Poincaré - Nancy I (2002) https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00145570 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. C. Bignon, O. Malcurat, and G. Halin. Coopération et Conception, Vers une coopération assistée pour les acteurs du bâtiment. Saint Ferréol, p. 12 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. K. C. Chen and H.-H. Ho. Transformation and Impact from the Software Ecosystem Perspective: Case Study of Autodesk Inc.’s Ecosystem Roadmap. p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Industry Collections | Autodesk https://www.autodesk.com/collections (2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. C. M. Eastman, P. M. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and G. Lee, BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors (Third edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Poinet, D. Stefanescu, and E. Papadonikolaki. Collaborative Workflows and Version Control Through Open-Source and Distributed Common Data Environment. in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 98, E. Toledo Santos and S. Scheer, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 228–247 (2021) DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51295-8_18. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Poinet and A. Fisher. Computational Extensibility and Mass Participation in Design. pp. 40–47 (2020) DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv13xprf6.9. [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Poinet, D. Stefanescu, and E. Papadonikolaki. SpeckleViz: A Web-based Interactive Activity Network Diagram for AEC. p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Poinet, D. Stefanescu, and E. Papadonikolaki. Web-based distributed design to fabrication workflows. p. 10. [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Poinet, D. Stefanescu, G. Tsakiridis, A. De Boissieu, and E. Papadonikolaki. Supporting collaborative design and project management for AEC using Speckle’s interactive data flow diagram. presented at the Design Computation Input/Output 2020, (2020) DOI: 10.47330/DCIO.2020.VYBA4375. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tools for Every Stack, Speckle (2021) https://speckle.systems/developers/sdks/ [Google Scholar]
  19. Speckle, Speckle (2022) https://speckle.systems/developers/sdks/ [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Chacon, Pro Git. Berkeley, CA: New York: Apress; Distributed to the book trade worldwide by Springer-Verlag (2009) [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Swink. Building Collaborative Innovation Capability. Research Technology Management, 49, no. 2, pp. 37–47 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Eigner. System Lifecycle Management: engineering digitalization (Engineering 4.0) (Wiesbaden [Heidelberg]: Springer Vieweg, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Janssen and R. Stouffs, Types of Parametric Modelling. CUMINCAD, p. 10 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. Certified Software, buildingSMART International https://www.buildingsmart.org/compliance/software-certification/certified-software/ [Google Scholar]
  25. Introduction | Speckle Docs. https://speckle.guide/dev/dotnet.html#getting-started [Google Scholar]
  26. Speckle | Sharp. Speckle (2022) https://github.com/specklesystems/speckle-sharp [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.