Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 148, 2022
The 2nd International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2022)
Article Number 02009
Number of page(s) 9
Section Research and Discussion of Public Administration and Humanities
Published online 31 October 2022
  1. Gómez-Mejía L R, Haynes K T, Nuñez-Nickel M, Jacob-son K J L, Moyano-Fuentes J. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms : Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 106, 52(2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berrone P, Cruz C, Gomez-Mejia L R. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 258, 25(2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I. Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 713, 38(2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhu Hong, Eric Kushins, Zhou Yinghui. Does social emotional wealth inhibit the innovation investment of Chinese family businesses? Management World, 99, 3(2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang Haijie, Lv Changjiang, Zhu Xiaowen. Second generation intervention and enterprise innovation--evidence from Chinese family listed companies. Nankai Management Review, 6, 1(2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. Lian Lishuang, Zhu Song, Chen Chao. The guiding role of capital market opening and stock price on enterprise investment: empirical evidence based on the trading system of Shanghai Hong Kong Stock Connect. China Industrial Economy, 100, 3(2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. Lv Feifei, Zhang Ke, Zhu Lina. Research on the relationship between economic expectation, family emotional attachment and entrepreneurial persistence. Journal of Management, 394, 3(2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. Koenig A, Kammerlander N, Enders A. The Family Innovation’s Dilemma: How Family Influence Affects the Adoption of Discontinuous Technologies By Incumbent Firms. The Academy of Management Review, 418, 3(2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu Zixu, Wang Man. Research on the level of innovation input of the second generation of family business succession in the context of intergenerational inheritance--based on the perspective of differential pattern. Business Economics and Management, 80, 12(2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. Bertrand M, Kramarz F, Schoar A. The Cost of Political Connections. Review of Finance, 849, 22(2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu Lina, Gao Hao. Research on the relationship between family control, social emotional wealth and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Management, 1679, 17(2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng Chen, Li Wanrong, Yuan Yuan. Cultural Heritage of Family Enterprises: Research on the Influence of Origin on Social Responsibility Performance. Management Review, 76, 2(2022) [Google Scholar]
  13. Dyer W G Jr, Whetten D A, Family firms and social responsibility: preliminary evidence from the S&P500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 785, 30(2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu Xiancong, Zhang Jian, Hu Zhiying. Characteristics of institutional investors, nature of ultimate controllers and tunneling of major shareholders: a study based on the perspective of related party transactions. Foreign Economy and Management, 3, 38(2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. Dyck A, Morse A, Zingales L. Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? The journal of finance, 2213, 6(2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li Chuntao, Zhao Yi, Xu Xin, Li Qingyuan. Press the gourd to float: analyst tracking and earnings management approach choice. Financial Research, 144, 4(2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. Anderson R, A Duru, D Reeb. Founders Heirs and Corporate Opacity in the United States. Journal of Financial Economics, 205, 2(2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu Bailu, Lv Changjiang. Research on M&A Behavior Based on Long term Value Orientation -Evidence from Chinese Family Enterprises. Accounting Research, 47, 6(2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. Xu N, Q Yuan, X Jiang, and K C. Chan. Founder`s Political Connections, Second Generation Involvement, and Family Firm Performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 243, 3(2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Anderson R C, Reeb D M. Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 1301, 4(2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Villalonga B, Amit R. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 385, 2(2006) [Google Scholar]
  22. Li Wenjing, Lu Xiaoyan. Are institutional investors concerned about the environmental performance of enterprises——Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China’s Heavy Pollution Industry. Financial Research, 97, 12(2005) [Google Scholar]
  23. Yu Shujiang, Yang Rui, Li Yanshuang. Social Emotional Wealth, Innovation Environment and Innovation Investment of Family Enterprises. Industrial Technology and Economy, 70, 12(2020) [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu Nianxing, Li Zhe. Senior executives’ poverty experience and corporate philanthropy. Economic Research, 135, 12(2016) [Google Scholar]
  25. Li Wenjing, Lu Xiaoyan. Are institutional investors concerned about the environmental performance of enterprises——Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China’s Heavy Pollution Industry. Financial Research, 97, 12(2015) [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Chuntao, Song Min, Zhang Xuan. Analyst Tracking and Enterprise Earnings Management Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Financial Research, 124, 7(2014) [Google Scholar]
  27. Deng Hao, He Xiaogang, Xiao Weifan. Kinship and change of senior executives in family businesses an explanation of limited altruism. Economic Management, 66, 10(2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhu Xiaowen, Lv Changjiang. Family business intergenerational inheritance: overseas training or domestic training? Economic Research, 68, 1, (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.