Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 149, 2022
International Conference on Social Science 2022 “Integrating Social Science Innovations on Post Pandemic Through Society 5.0” (ICSS 2022)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Education and Digital Learning
Published online 18 November 2022
  1. Vo, M.H., C. Zhu, and A.N. Diep, Students’ performance in blended learning: disciplinary difference and instructional design factors. Journal of Computers in Education, (2020). 7(4): p. 487–510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rasheed, R.A., A. Kamsin, and N.A. Abdullah, Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, (2020). 144: p. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arora, A.K., et al., Evaluating usability in blended learning programs within health professions education: a scoping review. Medical science educator, (2021). 31(3): p. 1213–1246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Castro-Gil, R. and D. Correa, Transparency in previous literature reviews about blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, (2021). 26(3): p. 3399–3426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashraf, M.A., et al., A systematic review of systematic reviews on blended learning: trends, gaps and future directions. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, (2021). 14: p. 1525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Setiawan, A.A., A. Muhtadi, and J. Hukom, Blended Learning and Student Mathematics Ability in Indonesia: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Instruction, (2022). 15(2). [Google Scholar]
  7. Sari, F.M. and A.Y. Wahyudin, Blended- Learning: The responses from non-English students in the Indonesian tertiary context. Teknosastik, (2019). 17(1): p. 23–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wahyuni, S., I.G.M. Sanjaya, and B. Jatmiko, Edmodo-Based Blended Learning Model as an Alternative of Science Learning to Motivate and Improve Junior High School Students’ Scientific Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, (2019). 14(7). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hasanah, H. and M.N. Malik, Blended learning in improving students’ critical thinking and communication skills at University. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, (2020). 15(5): p. 1295–1306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ardianti, S., et al., The impact of the use of STEM education approach on the blended learning to improve student’s critical thinking skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, (2020). 8(3B): p. 24–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cleveland-Innes, M. and D. Wilton, Guide to blended learning. (2018), Canada: Commonwealth of Learning. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith, K. and J. Hill, Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research & Development, (2019). 38(2): p. 383–397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bouilheres, F., et al., Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, (2020). 25: p. 3049–3069. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Regmi, K. and L. Jones, A systematic review of the factors–enablers and barriers–affecting e- learning in health sciences education. BMC medical education, (2020). 20(1): p. 1–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lane, S., et al., Engagement and Satisfaction: Mixed-Method Analysis of Blended Learning in the Sciences. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, (2021). 21(1): p. 100–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bonitasya, D.A., A. Widiyatmoko, and K. Sovansophal, The Effect of Blended Learning with a Collaborative Problem Solving Approach on Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes and Collaboration Skills in Science Learning. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, (2021). 7(2): p. 152–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yustina, Y., W. Syafii, and R. Vebrianto, The effects of blended learning and project-based learning on pre-service biology teachers’ creative thinking through online learning in the Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, (2020). 9(3): p. 408–420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Budiastra, A.K., et al., The effectiveness of blended learning for new generation learning materials to train science process skills. learning, (2021). 21: p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  19. Çakiroğlu, Ü., O. Güven, and E. Saylan, Flipping the experimentation process: influences on science process skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, (2020). 68(6): p. 3425–3448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harahap, F., N.E.A. Nasution, and B. Manurung, The Effect of Blended Learning on Student’s Learning Achievement and Science Process Skills in Plant Tissue Culture Course. International Journal of Instruction, (2019). 12(1): p. 521–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Patmanthara, S. and W.N. Hidayat. Improving vocational high school students digital literacy skill through blended learning model. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. (2018). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  22. Akgunduz, D. and O. Akinoglu, The Effect of Blended Learning and Social Media-Supported Learning on the Students’ Attitude and Self- Directed Learning Skills in Science Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, (2016). 15(2): p. 106–115. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alsalhi, N.R., M.E. Eltahir, and S.S. Al- Qatawneh, The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, (2019). 5(9): p. e02424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Boelens, R., B. De Wever, and M. Voet, Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, (2017). 22: p. 1–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Susiyawati, E., et al. Teachers’ Understanding of Blended Learning in Science Classroom. in International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021). (2021). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yılmaz, Ö. and K.L. Malone, Preservice teachers perceptions about the use of blended learning in a science education methods course. Smart Learning Environments, (2020). 7(1): p. 18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ubah, I.J.A., E.D. Spangenberg, and V. Ramdhany, Blended Learning Approach to Mathematics Education Modules: An Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, (2020). 19(7): p. 298–319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Setyaningsih, E., Face to Face or Online Learning: Students’ Perspectives on Blended Learning in Indonesia. Journal of English Language Studies, (2020). 5(1): p. 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tang, T., et al., Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, (2020): p. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  30. Owston, R., D. York, and S. Murtha, Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The internet and higher education, (2013). 18: p. 38–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wei, Y., et al. Blended learning versus traditional learning: a study on students’ learning achievements and academic press. in 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET). (2017). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  32. Oikawa, Y., et al. Designing a blended undergraduate general chemistry course using the ARCS model. in Aichi: Paper presented at the International Conference for Media in Education, Nihon Fukushi University. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  33. Rianto, A., Blended Learning Application in Higher Education: EFL Learners’ Perceptions, Problems, and Suggestions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, (2020). 5(1): p. 55–68. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pardede, P., Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Perception of Blended Learning. Journal of English Teaching, (2019). 5(1): p. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  35. Azka, A. and A. Faradillah, Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Blended Learning on Mathematics Learning Based on Gender. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, (2020). 3(2): p. 121–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Aron, A., E.J. Coups, and E.N. Aron, Statistics for Psychology. 6th ed. (2013), New Jersey: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar]
  37. Creswell, J.W., Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research 4th ed. (2012), Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  38. Delfino, A.P., Student engagement and academic performance of students of Partido State University. Asian Journal of University Education, (2019). 15(1): p. n1. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tulaskar, R. and M. Turunen, What students want? Experiences, challenges, and engagement during Emergency Remote Learning amidst COVID-19 crisis. Education and Information Technologies, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  40. Ferrer, J., et al., Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, (2020): p. 1–22. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.