Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 149, 2022
International Conference on Social Science 2022 “Integrating Social Science Innovations on Post Pandemic Through Society 5.0” (ICSS 2022)
Article Number 02023
Number of page(s) 8
Section Humanities
Published online 18 November 2022
  1. J. Tidd, J. Bessant, and K. Pavitt, ManagingInnovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organiztional Change, no. 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  2. J. A. Johannessen, B. Olsen, and G. T. Lumpkin, “Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom?,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 20–31, (2001), doi: 10.1108/14601060110365547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, “A theory of organizational knowledge creation lkujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi Katsu hiro Umemoto,” IJTM, Spec. Publ. Unlearning Learn., vol. 11, no. 7/8, pp. 833–845, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  4. R. M. Grant, “Toward a Knowledge-Base D Theory of the Firm Firm,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. Winter Special Issue, pp. 109–122, (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. H. Dyer and K. Nobeoka, “Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐ sharing network: the Toyota case,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 345–367, (2000), doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::aid-smj96>;2-e. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. C. Ologbo, K. Md Nor, and E. Okyere- Kwakye, “The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Employee Innovation Capabilities,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Stud., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 102, (2015), doi:10.5296/ijhrs.v5i3.8210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. F. Lin, “Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study,” Int. J. Manpow., vol. 28, no. 3–4, pp. 315–332, (2007), doi:10.1108/01437720710755272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N. F. Wuryaningrat, “Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and innovation capabilities: An empirical study on small and medium enterprises in North Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Gadjah Mada Int. J. Bus., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 61– 78, (2013), doi:10.22146/gamaijb.5402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mulyana, M. Assegaff, and . Wasitowati, “Pengaruh Knowledge Donating dan Knowledge Collecting terhadap Innovation Capability Kasus Pengembangan UKM Batik di Provinsi Jawa Tengah-Indonesia,” J. Manaj. Teknol., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 246–264, (2015), doi: 10.12695/jmt.2015.14.3.2. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Szulanski, “Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. SUPPL. WINTER, pp. 27–43, (1996), doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. . Nelson, “Journal Article Research on Productivity Growth and Productivity Differences: Dead Ends and New Departures Richard,” vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1029–1064, (1981). [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Indarti, The Effect of Knowledge Stickiness and Interaction on Absorptive Capacity. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  14. N. F. Wuryaningrat, P. Kindangen, G. Sendouw, and B. Lumanouw, “The role of person job fit and person organization fit on the development of innovation capabilities at indonesia creative industry,” Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 8, no. 5 C, pp. 80–85, (2019), doi: 10.35940/ijeat.E1011.0585C19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Z. Levin, R. Cross, and L. C. Abrams, “Why Should I Trust You ? Antecedents of Trust in a Knowledge Transfer Context,” (2002). [Google Scholar]
  16. W. Tsai, “Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing,” Organ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 179– 190, (2002), doi: 10.1287/orsc. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Minbaeva, T. Pedersen, I. Björkman, C. F. Fey, and H. J. Park, “MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 38–51, (2014), doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. N. F. Wuryaningrat, Kemampuan Inovasi Industri Kreatif Di Indonesia. Forum Pemuda Aswaja, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Rutten, J. Blaas – Franken, and H. Martin, “The impact of (low) trust on knowledge sharing,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 199–214, (2016), doi: 10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Kmieciak, “Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., (2020), doi: 10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134. [Google Scholar]
  21. K. P. P. N. P. Pembangunan, “Laporan Analisis Daya Saing UMKM di Indonesia,” (2015). [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Srivastava, K. M. Bartol, and E. A. Locke, “Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1239–1251, (2006), doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. I. Nonaka and P. Reinmoeller, Creating Value: Winners in the New Businee Environment Chapter 6: Knowledge Creation and Utilization: Promoting Dynamic Systems of Creative Routines. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  24. H. A. Simon, “Preview,” Organ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 125–134, 1991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. C. Suciu, E. Postma, C. Nasulea, and D.-F. Nasulea, “Competitiveness a Innovation Within The Creative Economy,” in Basiq International Conference: New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption 2018, (2018), no. June, pp. 431–437. [Google Scholar]
  26. N. Istifadah and H. Tjaraka, “The Competitive Strategy of SMEs in Digital Era,” Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. Entrep. Bus. Manag. (ICEBM 2020), vol. 174, no. Icebm 2020, pp. 415–419, (2021), doi:10.2991/aebmr.k.210507.062. [Google Scholar]
  27. K. E. Sveiby, “A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation,” J. Intellect. Cap., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 344–358, (2001), doi: 10.1108/14691930110409651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Damanpour, F. Sanchez-Henriquez, and H.H. Chiu, “Internal and External Sources and the Adoption of Innovations in Organizations,” Br. J. Manag., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 712–730, (2018), doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Hamdi, N. Indarti, H. F. G. . Manik, and A. S. Lukito-Budi, “Monkey see, monkey do? Examining the effect of entrepreneurial orientation and knowledge sharing on new venture creation for Gen Y and Gen Z,” J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ., pp. 2–3, (2022), doi: 10.1108/JEEE-08-2021-0302. [Google Scholar]
  30. J. G. March, “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning,” Organ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–87, (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. M. Appleyard, “How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. SUPPL. WINTER, pp. 137–154, (1996), doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Lawson and D. Samson, “Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach,” Int. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 05, no. 03, pp. 377–400, (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Samson, M. Gloet, and P. Singh, “Systematic Innovation Capability: Evidence From Case Studies And A Large Survey,” Int. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 21, no. 07, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Damanpour, “Organizational Innovation : A Meta-Analysis Of Effect Of Determinant and Mderators,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 555–590, (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. N. Indarti and D. Dyahjatmayanti, Manajemen Pengetahuan : Teori dan Praktek. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  36. R. Kamaşak and F. Bulutlar, “The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 306–317, (2010), doi: 10.1108/09555341011040994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. I. Nonaka, “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organ. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–37, (1994), doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. I. Nonaka and R. Toyama, “The knowledge- creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process,” Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–10, (2003), doi: 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. K. Dalkir, Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Elsevier Butterworth– Heinemann, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  40. B. Van Den Hooff and J. A. Ridder, “Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 117–130, (2004), doi: 10.1108/13673270410567675. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. C. M. Yeh, H. N. Hu, and S. H. Tsai, “A conceptual model of knowledge sharing and market orientation in the tourism sector,” Am. J. Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 343–347, (2011), doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2011.343.347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Polanyi, “The Tacit dimension,” in Knowledge in Organisations, (2009), pp. 135–146. [Google Scholar]
  43. B. McEvily and M. Tortoriello, “Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations,” J. Trust Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–63, (2011), doi:10.1080/21515581.2011.552424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. D. J. McAllister, “Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 24–59, (1995), doi: 10.5465/256727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. M. Tortoriello, R. Reagans, and B. McEvily, “Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units,” Organ. Sci., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1024–1039, (2012), doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0688. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. R. D. Hisrich and V. Ramadani, Efective Entrepreneurial Management:Strategy, Planning, Risk Management and Organization. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  47. J. D. Politis, “The connection between trust and knowledge management: What are its implications for team performance,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 55–66, (2003), doi: 10.1108/13673270310505386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. M. B. Kathryn and S. Abhishek, “Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems,” J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 64, (2002), [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  49. L. T. Tuan, “Behind knowledge transfer,” Manag. Decis., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 459–478, (2012), doi: 10.1108/00251741211216232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. C. H. Liu, “Creating competitive advantage: Linking perspectives of organization learning, innovation behavior and intellectual capital,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 66, pp. 13–23, (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. S. Sikombe and M. A. Phiri, “Exploring tacit knowledge transfer and innovation capabilities within the buyer–supplier collaboration: a literature review,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 6, no. 1, (2019), doi: 10.1080/23311975.2019.1683130. [Google Scholar]
  52. Z. Wang and N. Wang, “Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 8899–8908, (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Dogan and H. Dogan, “,” Financ. Stud., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 36–52, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  54. S. Ebrahimi Mehrabani and M. Shajari, “Knowledge Management and Innovation Capacity,” J. Manag. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, (2012), doi: 10.5296/jmr.v4i2.1390. [Google Scholar]
  55. S. Almahamid, A. Awwad, and A. McAdams, “Effects of Organizational Agility and Knowledge Sharing on Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study in Jordan,” Int. J. Manag., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 387–404, (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.04.006. [Google Scholar]
  56. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 63, pp. 539–569, (2012), doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. J. F. Hair, M. Page, and N. Brunsveld, Essentials of Business Research Methods Fourth Edition. Routledge, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  58. J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS- SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, (2011), doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. J. Risher and J. F. Hair, “The Robustness of PLS Across Disciplines The Robustness of PLS Across Disciplines,” Acad. Bus. J., vol. 1, pp. 47–55, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  60. J. C. Nunnally, “Psychometric Theory’ 25 Years Ago and Now,” Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 7–21, (1975), doi: 10.3102/0013189X004010007. [Google Scholar]
  61. R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, “The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1173–1182, (1986), doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. G. Fassot, J. Henseler, and P. S. Coelho, “Industrial Management & Data Systems Article information :,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 116, no. 9, pp. 1887–1900, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. J. Darroch, “Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 101–115, (2005), doi: 10.1108/13673270510602809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. P. S. Acosta, R. C. Palacios, and S. Popa, “innovation : an empirical investigation in SMEs TH,” Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., vol. 12, pp. 103–113, (2014), doi:10.1057/kmrp.2013.31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. S. Yeşil, A. Koska, and T. Büyükbeşe, “Knowledge Sharing Process, Innovation Capability and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study,” Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 75, pp. 217–225, (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. J. P. Kambey, N. F. Wuryaningrat, and L. I. Kumajas, “Examining leadership and knowledge sharing role on small and medium enterprises innovation capabilities,” Int. J. Econ. Bus. Adm., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–38, (2018), doi: 10.35808/ijeba/149. [Google Scholar]
  67. D. H. Mcknight and N. L. Chervany, “Trust and Distrust Definitions : One Bite at a Time Trust and Distrust Definitions :,” in Trust in Cyber- societies Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives, (2001), pp. 27–54, doi: 10.1007/3-540-45547-7. [Google Scholar]
  68. C. Tao, Y. Qu, H. Ren, and Z. Guo, “The influence of inter-enterprise knowledge heterogeneity on exploratory and exploitative innovation performance: The moderating role of trust and contract,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 14, (2020), doi: 10.3390/su1214567 [Google Scholar]
  69. D. C. Tway, “A Construct of Trust,” (1994). [Google Scholar]
  70. G. Möllering, “Cultivating the field of trust research,” J. Trust Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107–114, (2017), doi: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1380912. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. C. Ashley Fulmer and M. J. Gelfand, At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust: Trust Across Multiple Organizational Levels, vol. 38, no. 4. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  72. S. Matta, N. Rogova, and G. Luna-Cortés, “Investigating tolerance of uncertainty, COVID-19 concern, and compliance with recommended behavior in four countries: The moderating role of mindfulness, trust in scientists, and power distance,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 186, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. E. A. Boadi et al., “Value co-creation and employee service behaviours: The moderating role of trust in employee – hotel relationship,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 66, no. November 2021, p. 102898, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102898. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. D. Yang, X. Chen, B. Ma, and H. Wei, “When can interaction orientation create more service value? The moderating role of frontline employees’ trust in managers and employee deep acting,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 65, no. May 2021, p. 102841, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102841. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.