Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 163, 2023
2023 8th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2023)
Article Number 03023
Number of page(s) 4
Section Corporate Decision Making and Brand Operations Sales
Published online 28 April 2023
  1. Zhou, Key, Liu, Yang. Institutional embedding, green technology innovation and carbon emission reduction of entrepreneurial enterprises[J]. China Population-Resources and Environment, 2021 31(06):90–101. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xie Xuemei, Han Yuhang. How can local manufacturing enterprises achieve “magnificent transformation” in green innovation? --A multi-case study based on attention-based view[J]. Management World, 2022 38(03): 76–106. DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2022.0043. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dai Xiang, Yang Shuangzhi. Digital empowerment, digital input sources and green transformation of manufacturing industry[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(09):83–101. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu Chao, Yang Shuwang, Tang Pengcheng, Wu Ting, Fu Shuke. Construction of green innovation efficiency enhancement model for heavy pollution industry in China[J]. China Population-Resources and Environment, 2018 28(05):40–48. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pan A.-L., Liu X., Qiu J.-L., Shen Y. Can green M&A under media pressure lead to substantial transformation of heavy polluters[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019(02):174–192. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang Lan, Zhou Yahong. Environmental regulation and urban manufacturing transformation--analysis based on dual perspectives of industrial structure green transformation and enterprise technology upgrading[J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2022 42(06):1616–1631. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, F., Song, X. N., Dong, H. Z. The driving mechanism of resource endowment on green transformation of manufacturing industry - an explanation based on spatial Durbin model[J]. East China Economic Management, 2019 33(07):111–119. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cai L., Liu Q., Deng S., et al. Entrepreneurial Orientation and External Technology Acquisition:An Empirical Test on Performance of Technologybased New Ventures[J]. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2014 15(03):544–561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yu, Lianchao, Bi, Xi, Zhang, Weiguo. Construction of green transformation evaluation system for industrial enterprises[J]. Statistics and Decision Making, 2019(14), 35(14):186–188. [Google Scholar]
  10. Research Group, Institute of Industrial Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Li Ping. Research on green transformation of Chinese industry[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2011, (04):5–14. [Google Scholar]
  11. Leonidou L.C., Christodoulides P., Kyrgidou L.P., et al. Internal Drivers and Performance Consequences of Small Firm Green Business Strategy: The Moderating Role of External Force[J]. Journal of Business of Ethnics, 2017 140(03):585–606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tornatzky L., Fleischer M. The Process of Technology Innovation [M]. MA: Lexington Books, 1990:117–148. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhao Yunhui, Wang Lei, Feng Taiwen, et al. Research on the government's differentiated path to return to work and production under the new crown epidemic[J]. Scientific Research Management, 2021 42(4):191–200. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li Lei, Yang Water Conservancy, Chen Na. A study on the antecedent grouping and performance of digital transformation - empirical evidence from Chinese listed manufacturing companies [J/OL]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures: 1–10 [2022-11-12]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dai Xiang, Yang Shuangzhi. Digital empowerment, digital input sources and green transformation of manufacturing industry[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(09):83–101. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jin Y., Wen W., He Y. The impact of digital transformation on corporate green innovation - empirical evidence based on Chinese listed manufacturing companies[J]. Finance and Trade Research, 2022 33(07):69–83. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xing Hui, Jia Yinjie, Chen Yuanyuan. Does open innovation drive green transformation in manufacturing industry - a model with moderated mediating effects [J/OL]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures: 1–10 [2022-11-12]. [Google Scholar]
  18. Walker R.M. Internal and external antecedents of process innovation: a review and extension [J]. Public Management Review, 2014 16(1): 21–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, L.W., Ren, Xiangwei. Hierarchical Network Embedding, TMT Heterogeneity and Corporate Green Transformation Motivation - An Integrated Analytical Framework of Cross-Level Interaction Factors[J]. Finance and Economics Series, 2020(07):93–103. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhou Y., Hong J., Zhu K., et al. Dynamic Capability Matters: Uncovering Its Fundamental Role in Decision Making of Environmental Innovation[J]. Cleaner Production, 2018, 177:516–526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yu, Chang-Hong, Yuan, Yi-Jun. Firm size, technology acquisition pattern and R&D structure[J]. Scientology Research, 2017 35(10):1527–1535. [Google Scholar]
  22. Oliveira, T., Martins M.F. Literature review of in-formation technology adoption models at firm level[J]. E-lectronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 2011 14(1): 110–121. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cichosz M., Wallenburg C.M., Knemeyer A.M. Digital transformation at logistics service providers: barriers, success factors and leading practices[J]. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2020 31(2):1–13. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vorfolomeiev A. Implementation of resource efficient and cleaner production options at Ukrainian enterprises [J]. Acta Innovations, 2019(30):68–75. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li Q. M., Yang J. P., Jin Y. L. Intra-cluster competition, technological innovativeness and technological innovation performance of cluster firms[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 10(05):746–753 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.