Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 164, 2023
11th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences” (CILDIAH-2022)
Article Number 00071
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 11 May 2023
  1. E.E. Anisimova, On the integrity and coherence of the creolized text (to the problem formulation). Philolog. sci. 5, 74–85 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  2. V.M. Berezin, Mass communication. Essence, channels, actions (Moscow, Rip-Holding, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.B. Voroshilova, Political creolized text: reading keys (Yekaterinburg, Ural State Univ., 2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. I.A. Pile, Text as a polycode phenomenon. Media design: 21st century trends 3, 67–76 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. N.S. Gromova, Specifics of the interpretation of a multi-component creolized text. Bull. of Kostroma State Univ. 22(2), 156–160 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. O.I. Maksimenko, Polycode vs creolized text: a problem of terminology. Bull. of Peoples' Friendship Univ. of Rus. Ser. Theory of lang. Semiotics. Semantics 2, 93–102 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.B. Voroshilova, Creolized text: aspects of study. Polit. Linguistics 20, 180–189 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  8. N.V. Gladkaya, To the issue of demotivators as an integral part of the Internet discourse. New horizons of Rus. Stud. 11, 14–20 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Krzysztof, Demotivators as Deprecating and Phatic Multimodal Communicative Acts. In: Multimodal Epistemologies: Towards an Integrated Framework (New York, Routledge, 2014) DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.28252.51849 [Google Scholar]
  10. I.V. Bugaeva, Demotivators as a new genre in Internet communication: genre features, functions, structure, style. Style 10, 147–158 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. V.A. Kameneva, N.V. Rabkina, Functional and pragmatic potential of demotivators as a visual-verbal form of modern Internet communication. Polit. linguistics 1(43), 144–151 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. T.I. Surikova, Demotivator in media discourse: boundaries and properties of the genre. Medialinguistics 7(1), 29–50 (2020). Retrieved from: [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Grundlingh, Memes as Speech Acts. Social Semiotics 28(2), 1–22 (2017). DOI:10.1080/10350330.2017.1303020 [Google Scholar]
  14. B.E. Wiggins, G.B. Bowers, Memes as Genre: A Structurational Analysis of the Memescape. New Media & Society 1(21), 1–21 (2014). DOI: 10.1177/1461444814535194 [Google Scholar]
  15. L.V. Golovina, Mutual influence of iconic and verbal signs in the semantic perception of the text: dis.of cand. of philol. sciences (Moscow, 1986) [Google Scholar]
  16. O.A. Alimuradov, Notes on conceptual categories: structure and linguistic objectification. Cognit. Lang. stud. 9, 146–157 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  17. N.N. Boldyrev, Conceptual basis of the language. Cognit. Lang. stud. 4, 25–77 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  18. N.N. Boldyrev, Categorical level of knowledge representation in language: modus category of negation. Cognit. lang. stud. 7, 45–59 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Croft, D.A. Cruse, Cognitive Linguistics (Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M.W. Eysenck, M.T. Keane, Cognitive Psychology: a Student’s Handbook (New York, Psychology Press, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  21. R.T. Kellogg, Cognitive Psychology (Thousand Oak, Sage Publ., 1995) [Google Scholar]
  22. M.N. Latu, Nomination in developing terminological systems (Pyatigorsk, SNEG, 2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.