EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 169 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 169 (2023) 01067 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 169, 2023
4th International Symposium on Frontiers of Economics and Management Science (FEMS 2023)
Article Number 01067
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316901067
Published online 29 May 2023
  1. Fiske, D. W. Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329 (1949). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hong, B., Li, Z., & Minor, D. Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 199-213 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305360 (1976). [Google Scholar]
  4. Gu, J. J., & Hu, B. Relation of Heterogeneity of Knowledge Framework and Occupation Background About Top Management Team and Enterprise Technological Innovation Performance——An Empirical Study Based on Enterprise of Industry Cluster [J]. R&D Management, 2 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  5. Gyan, A.K. (2017). Agency Theory’s Effect on the Success of Total Quality Management and Firm Performance. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, 5, 57-72 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nugroho, A. C., Firdaus, M., Andati, T., & Irawan, T. Investment Decision in the Agency Theory Framework. Mix: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 8(1), 16-32. (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. McCrae, R. R. The Five-Factor Model across cultures. In A. T. Church (Ed.), The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures: Trait psychology across cultures (pp. 47–71). Praeger/ABC-CLIO (2017). [Google Scholar]
  8. King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of research in personality, 30(2), 189-203 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rogers, P. The Cognitive Psychology of Lottery Gambling: A Theoretical Review. J Gambl Stud 14, 111–134 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sampson, E. E. Cognitive psychology as ideology. American Psychologist, 36(7), 730–743 (1981). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Walker, C. Some applications of cognitive theory to second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 9(3), 287-306 (1987). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585 (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Markovits, H. A mental model analysis of young children’s conditional reasoning with meaningful premises. Thinking & Reasoning, 6(4), 335-347 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lim, B. C., & Klein, K. J. Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 403-418 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  16. Joshua D. Angrist, Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Theory and Practice, The Economic Journal, 114(494), C52–C83 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Elsasser, W. M. Outline of a theory of cellular heterogeneity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81(16), 5126-5129 (1984). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rojas, M. Heterogeneity in the relationship between income and happiness: A conceptual-referent-theory explanation. Journal of economic psychology, 28(1), 1-14 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative science quarterly, 659-684 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Streufert, S. & Pogash, R. Age and management team performance. Psychology and Aging 5(4):551-9 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  21. Ji Jian Empirical Research on the Relationship between the Background Characteristics of Top Management Team (TMT) and Firm Performance [J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2011, 32(05):54-59 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  22. Lim, B. C., & Klein, K. J. Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 403-418 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  23. Uitdewilligen, S., Waller, M. J., Roe, R. A., & Bollen, P. The Effects of Team Mental Model Complexity on Team Information Search and Performance Trajectories. Group & Organization Management, 10596011211023219 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  24. Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. Transformational leadership: relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of applied psychology, 89(4), 610 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Colbert, A. E., Barrick, M. R., & Bradley, B. H. Personality and leadership composition in top management teams: Implications for organizational effectiveness. Personnel psychology, 67(2), 351-387 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Özbağ, G. K. The role of personality in leadership: Five factor personality traits and ethical leadership. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 235-242 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of management, 23(4), 495-516 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Carpenter, M. A. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 275-284 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Barker V. L.III, & Patterson P. W.Jr, Top management team tenure and top manager causal attributions at declining firms attempting turnarounds. Group & Organization Management, 21(3), 304-336 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of business ethics, 81(1), 83-95 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of management, 33(2), 196-222 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, X. B, & Xu, X. X. Local Leader Competences and Development Performance. South China Journal of Economics, 2014(06):1-24 (2014)(in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, X. B, & Zhang, L, & Xu, X. X What Determines Local Fiscal Expenditure Propensity: On the Jurisdiction Leaders Perspective. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, 2013(06):157-167+180 (2013)(in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  34. Du, X. Q, & Zeng, Q, & Wu, J. W. Official Experience, Economic Growth and Political Promotion. Journal of Financial Research, 2012(02):30-47. (2012)(in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, P, & Zhao, G. C, & Luo, Z. Sources of Central Officials and Local Economic Growth. China Economic Quarterly [J], 2012, 11(02):613-634 (2012) (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  36. He, X. C & Zhang, X. L. The relationship of Political Connection, Official Background and the influences Private Enterprise [J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2011(04):55-61. (2011)(in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, E. S. Economic Growth and Local Governors’ Entrepreneurial Background——Evidence from the Secretary of the CPC Provincial Committee and Provincial Governor [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2011(04):55-61 (2010)(in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  38. Tanikawa, T., Kim, S., & Jung, Y Top management team diversity and firm performance: exploring a function of age. Team Performance Management: An International Journal (2017). [Google Scholar]
  39. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69-78 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Aljuhmani, H. Y., Emeagwali, O. L., & Ababneh, B. The relationships between CEOs’ psychological attributes, top management team behavioral integration and firm performance. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (2021). [Google Scholar]
  41. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206 (1984). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.