EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 171 (2023) SHS Web of Conf., 171 (2023) 01009 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 171, 2023
2023 4th International Conference on Mental Health, Education and Human Development (MHEHD 2023)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 6
Section Psychology Education and Rehabilitation Counseling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317101009
Published online 28 June 2023
  1. Austin, J.L. (1975) How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Searle, J.R. (1975) “Indirect speech acts,” Speech Acts, 3, pp. 59–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Searle, J.R. (1975) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts, A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/185220 (Accessed: February 12, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  4. Searle, J.R. (1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Weigand, E. (2010) Dialogue: The mixed game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jebahi, K. (2011) “Tunisian University Students’ choice of apology strategies in a discourse completion task,” Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), pp. 648–662. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, L. (2008) The Korean honorifics system and politeness in second language learning, British Library EthOS. Available at: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.497655 (Accessed: February 3, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  8. Grice, H.P. (1975) “Logic and conversation,” Speech Acts, pp. 41–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Felix-Brasdefer and Cesar, J. (2008) Politeness in Mexico and the United States, John Benjamins Publishing Catalog. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Available at: https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.171 (Accessed: February 3, 2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Abbas, F., Anjum, K. and Pasha, S.B. (2019) Speech act of apology by Pakistani English speakers through the theory of politeness., The Free Library. Knowledge Bylanes. Available at: https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Speech+Act+of+Ap ology+by+Pakistani+English+Speakers+through+the...-a0594666146 (Accessed: February 3, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (1991) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies: Semantic scholar, Language. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Cross-Cultural-ragmatics%3A-Requests-and-Apologies-Kuhn-Blum-Kulka/9d810e90bd98e202eb070b08c9d92ac4af561b9e (Accessed: February 3, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  13. Montgomery, M. (2008) Language and situation: Register1. Available at: https://www.cairn.info/revue-langage-et-societe-2008-2-page-89.htm (Accessed: February 3, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghazzoul, N. (2019) “Linguistic and pragmatic failure of Arab learners in direct polite requests and invitations: A cross-cultural study,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(2), pp. 223–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0902.13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Blum-Kulka, S. and Olshtain, E. (1984) “Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP)1,” Applied Linguistics, 5(3), pp. 196–213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thuruvan, P. and Yunus, M.M. (2017) The speech act of request in the ESL classroom. University Kebangsaan Malaysia. Available at: https://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/view/21952 (Accessed: January 21, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  17. Bachman, L.F. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing, Google Books. OUP Oxford. Available at: https://books.google.com/books/about/Fundamental_ Considerations_in_Language_T.html?id=5_KJCfkWgqcC (Accessed: February 5, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  18. Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1980) “Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to Second language teaching and testing,” Applied Linguistics, I(1), pp. 1–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/i.1.1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S. (1996) Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests, Google Books. OUP Oxford. Available at: https://books.google.com/books/about/Language_Te sting_in_Practice.html?id=E0yH0NdySrQC (Accessed: February 5, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  20. Holtgraves, T. (2007) “Second language learners and speech act comprehension,” Language Learning, 57(4), pp. 595–610. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00429.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taguchi, N. (2002) “An application of relevance theory to the analysis of L2 interpretation processes: The comprehension of indirect replies,” IRAL -International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2002.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ilyas, S. and Khushi, Q. (2012) “Facebook Status Updates: A Speech Act Analysis,” Academic Research International, 3(2), pp. 500–507. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tsoumou, J.M. (2020) “Analysing speech acts in politically related Facebook Communication,” Journal of Pragmatics, 167, pp. 80–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bach, K. and Harnish, R.M. (1982) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Grundlingh, L. (2017) “Memes as speech acts,” Social Semiotics, 28(2), pp. 147–168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1303020. [Google Scholar]
  26. Levine, P. and Scollon, R. (2004) Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jewitt, C. (2013) “Multimodal Methods for researching Digital Technologies,” The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research, pp. 250– 265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282229.n18. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tang, Y. and Hew, K.F. (2018) “Emoticon, Emoji, and sticker use in computer-mediated communications: Understanding its communicative function, impact, user behavior, and motive,” New Media for Educational Change, pp. 191–201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8896-4_16. [Google Scholar]
  29. Byron, K. and Baldridge, D.C. (2007) “E-mail recipients’ impressions of senders’ likability: The interactive effect of nonverbal cues and recipients’ personality,” Journal of Business Communication, 44(2), pp. 137–160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943606297902. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Janssen, J.H., IJsselsteijn, W.A. and Westerink, J.H.D.M. (2014) How effective technologies can influence intimate interactions and improve social connectedness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.007 (Accessed: February 15, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  31. Utz, S. (2000) “Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds,” Journal of online behavior, 1(1). [Google Scholar]
  32. Yoo, J. (2007) “To smile or not to smile:): Defining the effects of emoticons on relational outcomes,” In Annual meeting of International Communication Association Conference. [Google Scholar]
  33. Derks, D., Fischer, A.H. and Bos, A.E.R. (2008) “The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A Review,” Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), pp. 766–785. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chang, C.Y.-huey (2016) “EFL reviewers’ emoticon use in asynchronous computer-mediated peer response,” Computers and Composition, 40, pp. 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Derks, D., Bos, A.E.R. and Grumbkow, J. von (2007) “Emoticons and social interaction on the internet: The importance of social context,” Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), pp. 842–849. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ahn, W., Park, J. and Han, K.-hee (2011) “Emoticons convey emotion in CMC,” Electronic Workshops in Computing [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2011.11. [Google Scholar]
  37. Braumann, E. et al. (2010) “The effect of emoticons in synchronous and asynchronous e-negotiations,” in Proceedings of the 11th Group Decision \& Negotiation Conference (GDN 2010), pp. 113–115. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gettinger, J. and Koeszegi, S.T. (2015) “More than words: The effect of emoticons in electronic negotiations,” Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pp. 289–305. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_23. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cao, Z. and Ye, J. (2009) “Attention savings and emoticons usage in BBS,” 2009 Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology, pp. 416–419. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/iccit.2009.112. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tossell, C.C. et al. (2012) “A longitudinal study of emoticon use in text messaging from smartphones,” Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), pp. 659–663. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wolf, A. (2000) “Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(5), pp. 827–833. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310050191809 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen, X. and Siu, K.W. (2016) “Exploring user behaviour of emoticon use among Chinese youth,” Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(6), pp. 637–649. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2016.1269199. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.