EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 177 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 177 (2023) 02002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 177, 2023
International Conference Legal Perspectives on the Internet. COPEJI 6.0. The Right to the Confluence of Two Universes: Where to?
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 13
Section Legal Aspects of the Emergence and Use of New Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317702002
Published online 22 September 2023
  1. E. Donahoe, The Need for a Paradigm Shift on Digital Security in eds. F.O. Hampson, M. Sulmeyer, Getting beyond Norms New Approaches to International Cyber Security Challenges Special Report, Centre for International Governance Innovation, 31 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Gibson, Neuromancer (Ace Books, first published 1984) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Lillemose, M. Kryger, Commentary Artikel på dansk, The (Re)invention of Cyberspace, Who invented cyberspace?, URL: https://kunstkritikk.com/the-reinvention-of-cyberspace/, accessed 16.02.2023 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Baezner, P. Robin, Trend Analysis: Cyber Sovereignty, Risk and Resilience Team Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich, 8 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Ottis, P. Lorents,. Cyberspace: Definition and Implications. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Warfare and Security, Dayton, OH, US, 8-9 April, Reading: Academic Publishing Limited, 267-270, URL: https://ccdcoe.org/library/publications/cyberspace-definition-and-implications/, accessed 16.02.2023 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Shen, Chinese Political Science Review, 1:81. 93, 82 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Nyman Metcalf, Tallinn Paper, 10, 2 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Broeders, L. Adamson, R. Creemers, Coalition of the unwilling? Chinese and Russian perspectives on cyberspace, in The Hague Program For Cyber Norms Policy Brief, 2, URL: https://www.thehaguecybernorms.nl/research-and-publication-posts/a-coalition-of-the-unwilling-chinese-and-russian-perspectives-on-cyberspace, accessed 10.02.2023 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Arsène, Global Internet Governance in Chinese Academic Literature. Rebalancing a Hegemonic World Order?, China Perspectives 2016/2 What Kind of International Order Does China Want, 28 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Zeng, T. Stevens, Y. Chen, Discourse of ‘Internet Sovereignty’, Politics & Policy, 45 (3), 432-464, 451 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Mueller, Sovereignty and Cyberspace: Institutions and Internet governance, Essay presented at the 5th Annual Vincent and Elinor Ostrom Memorial Lecture, given at the University of Indiana October 3rd 2018, URL: http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/10410/5th-Ostrom-lecture-DLC.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, accessed 12.02.2023 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. Convention on Cybercrime, 23.XI.2001, ETS No.185. [Google Scholar]
  13. Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems, Jan. 28, ETS No. 189 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  14. Agreement between the Governments of the Member States of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation on Cooperation in the Field of International Information Security, 61st Plenary Meeting, Dec. 2 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. Constitution and Convention of the International Telecommunication Union, Dec. 22, 1825 UNTS 330 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  16. The International Telecommunication Regulations and their Appendices, adopted by the World Conference on International Telecommunications, Dubai, 2012/ International Telecommunication Union, Final Acts, of the World Conference on International Telecommunications (Dubai, 2012) (2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Pijović,. The Cyberspace ‘Great Game’. The Five Eyes, the Sino-Russian Bloc and the Growing Competition to Shape Global Cyberspace Norms, 13th International Conference on Cyber Conflict Going Viral, T. Jančárková, L. Lindström, G. Visky, P. Zotz (Eds.) 2021 NATO CCDCOE Publications, Tallinn, 215-231 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  18. Annex to the letter dated 9 January 2015 from the Permanent Representatives of China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, UN Doc A/69/723, URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/786846?ln=en, accessed 12.02.2023 [Google Scholar]
  19. Annex to the letter dated 9 January 2015 from the Permanent Representatives of China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, Sixty-ninth session Agenda item 91 Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, A/69/723, URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/786846?ln=en, accessed 12.02.2023 [Google Scholar]
  20. International Code of Conduct, para 1. [Google Scholar]
  21. International Code of Conduct, para 2 (1). [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Broeders, L. Adamson and R. Creemers (n 15) 2 [Google Scholar]
  23. M.N. Schmitt (ed.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Delerue, François, ESIL Reflections, 7:4, 2 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Talbot Jensen, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 48, 735-778 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. The Paris Call for Trust and Security in Cyberspace. 2018, URL: https://pariscall.international/en/, accessed 12.02.2023 [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Guay, L. Rudnick, What the Digital Geneva Convention means for the future of humanitarian action, The Policy Lab June 25, URL: https://www.unhcr.org/innovation/digital-geneva-convention-mean-future-humanitarian-action/, accessed 12.02.2023 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Jeutner, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 10 (1), 158–170 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Tolppa, Overview of the UN OEWG developments: continuation of discussions on how International Law applies in cyberspace, URL: https://ccdcoe.org/library/publications/overview-of-un-oewg-developments-continuation-of-discussions-on-how-international-law-applies-in-cyberspace/, accessed 10.02.2023 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  30. CCDCOE. Trends in International Law for cyberspace, URL: https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2019/05/Trends-Intlaw_a4_final.pdf, accessed 12.02.2023 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Kanuck, Texas Law Review, 88, 1575 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  32. UNODA, Fact Sheet Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of International Security, URL: https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Information-Security-Fact-Sheet-July-2019.pdf, accessed 12.02.2023(2019) [Google Scholar]
  33. I. J. van Os, The United Nations, Global Cyberspace, and the Route to Hegemony, Leiden University, URL: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/75333/Final%20Master%20Thesis%20GPE%202%20%281%29.pdf?sequence=1, accesssed 10.02.2023 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Moynihan, Power Politics Could Impede Progress on Responsible Regulation of Cyberspace, URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/power-politics-could-impede-progress-responsible-regulation-cyberspace, accessed 10.02.2023 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  35. UNODA, Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security, Fact Sheet, URL: https://unoda-web.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Information-Security-Fact-Sheet-July-2019.pdf, accessed 10.02.2023 [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Kaljurand, United Nations Group of Governmental Experts: The Estonian Perspective, in A.-M. Osula, H. Rõigas (eds.), International Cyber Norms, Legal, Policy & Industry Perspectives, NATO CCD COE Publications, Tallinn, 114, URL: https://dig.watch/processes/un-gge, accessed 10.02.2023 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  37. UNGGE members in 2019-2021: Australia, Brazil, China, Estonia, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, Norway, Romania, Russian Federation, Singapore, South Africa, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and Uruguay, URL: https://www.un.org/disarmament/group-of-governmental-experts/ [Google Scholar]
  38. United Nations General Assembly, Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security, para. 19, U.N. Doc. A/68/98, June 24, para 19, URL: http://undocs.org/A/68/98, accessed 10.02.2023 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  39. A.-M. Osula, H. Rõigas, Introduction , in Anna-Maria Osula and Henry Rõigas (eds.), A.-M. Osula, H. Rõigas (eds.), International Cyber Norms, Legal, Policy & Industry Perspectives, NATO CCD COE Publications, Tallinn, 17, URL: https://dig.watch/processes/un-gge, accessed 10.02.2023 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  40. United Nations, General Assembly, Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security, A/68/98, 24 June (2013) [Google Scholar]
  41. United Nations, General Assembly, Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security, A/68/98, 24 June, paras 20, 27, 28 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  42. United Nations General Assembly, Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security, A/70/174 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  43. P. Meyer, Norms of Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace, in M. Christen, B. Gordijn, M. Loi (eds.), The Ethics of Cybersecurity, The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, 21, 353 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  44. E. Tikk, M. Kerttunen, Mika, The Alleged Demise of the UN GGE: An Autopsy and Eulogy, in Cyber Policy Institute, 14 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  45. S. Soesanto, F. D’Incau, The UN GGE is dead: Time to fall forward. Commentary, URL: https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_time_to_fall_forward_on_cyber_governance accessed 10.02.2023 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  46. B. Lété, Bruno, P. Chase, Peter, Shaping Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace, in The German Marshall Fund of the United States Workshop Briefing Paper, 6 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  47. UN General Assembly, General Assembly, Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, UN Doc A/RES/73/27, URL: https://undocs.org/A/RES/73/27, accesed 10.02.2023 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  48. UN General Assembly General Assembly, Resolution adopted by by the General Assembly on 22 December 2018 on Advancing responsible State behaviour in Cyberspacein the context of international security, UN Doc A/RES/73/266, URL: https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/73/266, accessed 10.02.2023 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  49. UN GGE Chair`s Summary, URL: https://www.un.org/disarmament/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/gge-chair-summary-informal-consultative-meeting-5-6-dec-20191.pdf. accessed 10.02.2023 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  50. T. Maurer, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 12, 283–305 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Statements by the Republic of Finland Open-Ended Working Group on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security Virtual Informal Consultations 19 June and 2 July 2020, Statement 2 delivered 2 July 2020, URL: https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/oewg-informal-virtual-meetings-statement-by-finland-19-june-and-2-july-2020.pdf, accessed 10.02.2023 [Google Scholar]
  52. The future of discussions on ICTs and Cyberspace at the UN, URL: https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/joint-contribution-poa-the-future-of-cyber-discussions-at-the-un-10302020.pdf, accessed 10.02.2023 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  53. United Nations High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation, The Age of Digital Interdependence, Report of the UN Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation, URL: https://www.un.org/en/pdfs/DigitalCooperation-report-for%20web.pdf, accessed 09.02.2023 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  54. D. Shekton, International Law and ‘Relative Normativity’, in ed. M. D. Evans, International Law, Fourth Edition. 159 (Oxford Universrity Press, Oxford, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  55. T. Erskine, M. Carr, Beyond ‘Quasi-Norms: The Challenges and Potential of Engaging with Norms in Cyberspace’, in A.-M. Osula, H. Rõigas (eds.), International Cyber Norms: Legal, Policy & Industry Perspectives, 100 (NATO CCDCOE Publications, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  56. International Law Commission. 2001, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, by the Commission at its fifty-third session, in 2001, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission’s report covering the work of that session, annex to General Assembly resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001, https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf, accessed 09.02.2023 [Google Scholar]
  57. M. N. Schmitt, L. Vihul, The Nature of International Law Cyber Norms, Tallinn Paper No. 5 Special Expanded Issue, 31, URL:https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2018/10/Tallinn-Paper-No-5-Schmitt-and-Vihul.pdf. accessed 10.02.2023 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  58. Cour permanente de Justice internationale, Chorzow Factory Case, 1928 PCIJ., (ser. A) No. 13, at 28. [Google Scholar]
  59. International Court of Justice, Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1971, 16. para 53 (1970) [Google Scholar]
  60. G. Rona, Gabor, L. Aarons, Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 8:503, 505506 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  61. Human Rights Council, The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet, United Nations A/HRC/20/L.13, 29 June (2012) [Google Scholar]
  62. United Nations General Assembly, The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet, A/HRC/RES/26/13 26/13, URL: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/082/83/PDF/G1408283.pdf?OpenElement, accessed 10.02.2023 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  63. Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, A/HRC/17/27, URL: https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/A.HRC.17.27_en.pdf, accessed 10.02.2023 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  64. UNESCO, URL: https://www.unesco.org/en/freedom-expression-online, accessed 10.02.2023 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  65. World Summit on the Information Society Geneva 2003-Tunis 2005,WSIS03/GENEVA/DOC/4-E, 12 December, URL: https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html, accessed 20.02.2023 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  66. Human Rights Committee, General comment No. 34, Article 19: Freedoms of opinion and expression, CCPR/C/GC/34 July 2011, para 43 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  67. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, The Representative on Freedom of the Media Amsterdam Recommendations, Freedom of the Media and the Internet, URL: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/4/a/41903.pdf, accessed 12.02.2023 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  68. Council of Europe, Recommendation CM/Rec(2014)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on a Guide to human rights for Internet users (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 16 April 2014 at the 1197th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies), URL: https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680645b44, accessed 10.02.2023 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  69. D. Dror-Shpoliansky, Y. Shany, EJIL, 32(4), 1249–1282, DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chab087 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. United Nations General Assembly, Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 31 December 2020, A/RES/75/240, URL: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N21/000/25/PDF/N2100025.pdf?OpenElement, accessed 12.02.2023 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  71. United Nations General Assembly, Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 7 December 2022, A/RES/77/37, URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3991743?ln=en, accessed 10.02.2023 (2022) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.