Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 179, 2023
2023 6th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2023)
Article Number 05004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Human History and Intercultural Communication Research
Published online 14 December 2023
  1. Barnard, M. (2013). Graphic design as communication. Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Walker, S., 2017. Research in graphic design. The Design Journal, 20(5), pp.549-559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nini, P.J., 2006. Sharpening one’s axe: Making a case for a comprehensive approach to research in the graphic design process. Design studies: Theory and research in graphic design, pp.117-129. [Google Scholar]
  4. Teerapong, K., 2014. Graphical ways of researching. Proceedings of the Graphical Ways of Researching, Como, Italy, 27. [Google Scholar]
  5. George Mason University Department of Art & Visual Technology Syllabus and Policies Graphic Design Methods & Principles AVT 311 | Fall 2014 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alhajri, S., 2016. The Effectiveness of Teaching Methods Used in Graphic Design Pedagogy in Both Analogue and Digital Education Systems. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), pp.422-425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pena, V.L., López-Chao, V.A. and L-Chao, M. A., 2016. Analysis of teaching methods in graphic design in the Galician University System (GUS) in Spain. The Anthropologist, 25(3), pp.214-219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zampetakis, L.A., Tsironis, L. and Moustakis, V., 2007. Creativity development in engineering education: The case of mind mapping. Journal of management Development, 26(4), pp.370-380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sari, S.A., 2016. The development of mind mapping media in flood material using ADDIE model. Journal of Education and Learning (Edu Learn), 10(1), pp.53-62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosciano, A., 2015. The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10(2), pp.93-99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Biktimirov, E.N. and Nilson, L.B., 2006. Show them the money: Using mind mapping in the introductory finance course. Journal of Financial Education, pp.72-86. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ismail, M.N., Ngah, N.A. and Umar, I.N., 2010. The effects of mind mapping with cooperative learning on programming performance, problem solving skill and metacognitive knowledge among computer science students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), pp.35-61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones, P. and Morrison, M., 2021. Mind-mapping in design culture: A tool for ideation in graphic design education. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kokotovich, V., 2008. Problem analysis and thinking tools: an empirical study of non- hierarchical mind mapping. Design studies, 29(1), pp.49-69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ale Ebrahim, N., 2013. Introduction to the Research Tools mind map. Research World, 10(4), pp.1-3. [Google Scholar]
  17. Moi, W.A.G. and Lian, O.L., 2007. Introducing mind map in comprehension. Educational Research Association (Singapore). [Google Scholar]
  18. Davies, M., 2011. Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?. Higher education, 62(3), pp.279-301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D'Antoni, A.V., Zipp, G.P. and Olson, V.G., 2009. Interrater reliability of the mind map assessment rubric in a cohort of medical students. BMC Medical Education, 9(1), pp.1-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, J., 2008, November. The using of mind map in concept design. In 2008 9th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design (pp. 1034-1037). IEEE. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dhindsa, H.S. and Roger Anderson, O., 2011. Constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), pp.186-200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Siochos, V. and Papatheodorou, C., 2011. Developing a formal model for mind maps. [Google Scholar]
  23. Phan, D., Xiao, L., Yeh, R. and Hanrahan, P., 2005, October. Flow map layout. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005. (pp. 219-224). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  24. Long, D.J. and Carlson, D., 2011. Mind the map: How thinking maps affect student achievement. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 13(2), pp.262-262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Negrini, S., Zaina, F. and Atanasio, S., 2008. BRACE MAP, a proposal for a new classification of braces. In Research into Spinal Deformities 6 (pp. 299-302). IOS press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shneiderman, B. and Wattenberg, M., 2001, October. Ordered treemap layouts. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001. (pp. 73-78). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cvitanovic, P., Shraiman, B. and Söderberg, B., 1985. Scaling laws for mode lockings in circle maps. Physica Scripta, 32(4), p.263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parker, T.H. and Wolfson, J.G., 1993. Pseudo- holomorphic maps and bubble trees. The Journal of Geometric Analysis, 3(1), pp.63-98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Calvin, K.L. and Gray, S., 2022. Double-bubble thinking maps and their effect on reading comprehension in Spanish-English bilingual middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(3), pp.212-224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Al-Jarf, R., 2011. Teaching spelling skills with a mind-mapping software. Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 53(4). [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosciano, A., 2015. The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10(2), pp.93-99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hindrasti, N.E.K., Anggraini, N.F. and Amelia, T., 2022, January. Does Mind Mapping Technique Affect Creative Thinking Skill and Cognitive Learning Outcomes?. In ICOME 2021: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Education, ICOME 2021, 3-5 November 2021, Tanjungpinang, Riau Islands, Indonesia (p. 11). European Alliance for Innovation. [Google Scholar]
  33. Selvi, R.T. and Chandramohan, G., 2018, December. Case study on effective use of mind map in engineering education. In 2018 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E) (pp. 205-207). IEEE. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferahtia, A., 2021. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: SURFACE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN SEMIARID REGION (EL HODNA WATERSHED, ALGERIA) BASED ON WATER QUALITY INDEX (WQI). [Google Scholar]
  35. Tee, T.K., Azman, M.N.A., Mohamed, S., Mohamad, M.M., Yunos, J.M., Yee, M.H. and Othman, W., 2014. Buzan mind mapping: An efficient technique for note-taking. International Journal of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), pp.28-31. [Google Scholar]
  36. Buran, A. and Filyukov, A., 2015. Mind mapping technique in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, pp.215-218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen, Y., 2016, January. Qinqiang opera drama costume connotation and aesthetic implication. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Education Technology, Management and Humanities Science (pp. 521-523). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Law, H.C., 2021. Opera, Society, and Politics in Modern China By Hsiao-t'i Li. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London: Harvard University Asia Center, 2019. 365 pages. Hardcover, $49.95, ISBN 978-0-674-98716-6. International Journal of Asian Studies, 18(2), pp.307-310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, K., Gao, Y., Zhang, J. and Zhu, C., 2022. Study on digital protection and innovative design of Qin opera costumes. Heritage Science, 10(1), pp.1-15. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dong, Y., Zhu, S. and Li, W., 2021. Promoting sustainable creativity: an empirical study on the application of mind mapping tools in graphic design education. Sustainability, 13(10), p.5373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.