Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 189, 2024
The 2nd International Conference on Ergonomics Safety, and Health (ICESH) and the 7th Ergo-Camp (ICESH & Ergo-Camp 2023)
Article Number 01022
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418901022
Published online 09 April 2024
  1. S. Das, M. Krishna Moorthy, and K. Shanmugaraja, “Analysis of Musculoskeletal Disorder Risk in Cotton Garment Industry Workers,” J. Nat. Fibers, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.2162182 [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Baskaran, K. Sankaranarayanasamy, and G. Kuruva, “Musculoskeletal disorder risk levels in mobile crane operators: An ergonomic assessment,” in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, pp. 3089–3092, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.252 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Irawati, G. Yogisutanti, and N. Sitorus, “Relationship Between Nutritional Status, Years Of Service, And Work Attitudes With Musculoskeletal Disorders In Tailors At West Java” JPH RECODE, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.20473/jphrecode.v4i1.15637 [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Shobur, M. Maksuk, and F. I. Sari, “Faktor Risiko Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) pada Pekerja Tenun Ikat di Kelurahan Tuan Kentang Kota Palembang,” J. Med., vol. 6, no. 2, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.poltekkesbanten.ac.id/Medikes/article/view/188 [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Megawati, “Edukasi Pengurangan Resiko Terjadinya Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) Dini, Pada Penjahit Keliling Di Ngaliyan Semarang,” Budimas, vol. Vol 3, no. 2, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/budimas.v3i2.3478 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Pratiwi, M. Munfiah, R. Fitriadi, and M. F. Sufa, “Evaluation of Work Posture in Sohun Noodles Workers using OWAS and WERA Method,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1788–1795, 2019, https://www.ijitee.org/portfolio-item/K17670981119/ [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. P. Restuputri, R. U. Achmad, M. Lukman, and I. Masudin, “Analysis of Work Posture Using the Muscle Fatigue Assessment (MFA) and Novel Ergonomic Postural Assessment (NERPA)o Title,” J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.23917/jiti.v20i1.13222 [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Andrian, A. Camelia, and H. F. Faisya, “Analysis of Working Postures with Musculoskeletal Disorders (Msds) Complaint of Tailors in Ulak Kerbau Baru Village, Ogan Ilir,” J. Ilmu Kesehat. Masy., vol. 11, no. 1, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.26553/jikm.2020.11.1.75-88 [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Bhatia, J. S. Randhawa, A. Jain, and V. Grover, “Ergonomic Assessment of Indian Dentists Using theAssessment of Repetitive Tasks (Art) Technique,” in Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021, 2021, pp. 688–696, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-746117_95 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. S. R. Jafari, V. Feyzi, Z. Foroozanfar, and S. Rahimimoghadam, “The correlation between ART and OCRA methods used for posture assessment of repetitive tasks,” Med. Lav., vol. 112, no. 5, 2021 https://doi.org/10.23749%2Fmdl.v112i5.11117 [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Sakthi Nagaraj, R. Jeyapaul, and K. Mathiyazhagan, “Evaluation of ergonomic working conditions among standing sewing machine operators in Sri Lanka,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 70, pp. 70–83, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.01.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Bontrup et al., “Low back pain and its relationship with sitting behaviour among sedentary office workers,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 81, p. 102894, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102894 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. O. Adiyanto, E. Mohamad, R. Jaafar, F. Ma’ruf, M. Faishal, and A. Anggraeni, “Application of Nordic Body Map and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment for Assessing Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A case study in Small and Medium Enterprises,” Int. Journal of Integr. Eng., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 10–19, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/ijie/article/view/5631/4898 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Arippa, A. Nguyen, M. Pau, and C. Harris-Adamson, “Postural strategies among office workers duringa prolonged sitting bout,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 102, p. 103723, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103723 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. G. Davis, S. E. Kotowski, D. Daniel, T. Gerding, J. Naylor, and M. Syck, “The home office: ergonomicLessons From the ‘new normal,’” Ergon. Des., vol. Volume 28, no. 4, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804620937907 [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Lating, M. Lihi, and A. R. Lapodi, “Hubungan antara Posisi dan Lama Duduk dengan Kejadian Low Back Pain (LBP) pada Penjahit di Kota Ambon,” Tunas-tunas Ris. Kesehat., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.33846/2trik12106 [Google Scholar]
  17. I. Pratiwi and T. Adhitama, “Ergonomic Risk Evaluation to Minimize Musculoskeletal Disorders in SMEs Leather Shoes at Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 203–212, 2022 https://doi.org/10.23917/jiti.v21i2.19502 [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Hosseini, A. Choobineh, M. Razeghi, H. R. Pakshir, H. Ghaem, and M. Vojud, “Ergonomic Assessment of Exposure to Musculoskeletal Disorders Risk Factors among Dentists of Shiraz, Iran,” J. Dent., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.30476%2FDENTJODS.2019.44564 [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Saavedra-Robinson, “Ergonomic assessment of repetitive work time as a key parameter for job rotation schedules,” J. Hum. Factors Ergon., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023 https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2023.128572 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. O. T. Okareh, O. E. Solomon, and R. Olawoyin, “Prevalence of ergonomic hazards and persistent work- related musculoskeletal pain among textile sewing machine operators,” Saf. Sci., vol. 136, p. 105159, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105159 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Tondre and T. Deshmukh, “Guidelines to sewing machine workstation design for improving working posture of sewing operator,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 71, pp. 37–46, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.02.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.