EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 189 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 189 (2024) 01023 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 189, 2024
The 2nd International Conference on Ergonomics Safety, and Health (ICESH) and the 7th Ergo-Camp (ICESH & Ergo-Camp 2023)
Article Number 01023
Number of page(s) 17
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418901023
Published online 09 April 2024
  1. Badan Pusat Statistik, Konstruksi Dalam Angka 2022, Jakarta: BPS RI, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Direktorat Statistik Industri, Indikator Konstruksi: Triwulan IV-2022, Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. J. Tixier, M. R. Hallowell, B. Rajagopalan and D. Bowman, “Automated content analysis for construction safety: A natural language processing system to extract precursors and outcomes from unstructured injury reports,” Automation in Construction, vol. 62, pp. 45–56, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Media Komunikasi BPSDM Kementerian PUPR, Safety Construction: Komitmen dan Konsistensi Terapkan SMK3, Jakarta: Tim Redaksi Buletin Parampara, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. M. Al-Hemoud dan M. A.-A. May, “A behavior based safety approach at a Kuwait research institution,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 201–206, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Mahaju, J. C. Carver and G. L. Bradshaw, “Human Error Management in Requirements Engineering: Should We Fix The Peopple, The Processes, Or The Environment?,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 160, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Wulandari, C. Wuni and Sugiarto, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan dengan Kecelakaan Kerja,” Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 311–324, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Newaz, P. Davis and M. Jefferies, “Examining the Psychological Contract as Mediator between the Safety Behavior of Supervisors and Workers on Construction Sites,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 146, no. 1, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Rasmussen, “The Role Of Error In Organizing Behaviour,” Ergonomics, vol. 33, pp. 1185–1199, 1990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Woods, S. Dekker, R. Cook, L. Johannesen and N. Sarter, Behind Human Error, London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Mulyono, Bahan Bangunan dan Konstruksi, Yogyakarta: Stiletto Indie Book, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Dykstra, Construction Project Management: A Complete Introduction, Kirshner Publishing Company, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Natsir, “Membangun Sistem Rantai Pasok Konstruksi Nasional yang Efektif, Efisien, dan Mandiri,” in Buku Konstruksi Indonesia Tahun 2021, Jakarta, Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, 2021, p. 348. [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Rozenfeld, R. Sacks, Y. Rosenfeld and H. Baum, “Construction Job Safety Analysis,” Safety Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 491–498, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  15. Badan Pusat Statistik, Statistik Konstruksi, Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Pohan, “Peningkatan Pengendalian Mutu Sertifikasi Tenaga Kerja Konstruksi Teranpil Melalui 123 Konsep di Ditjen Bina Konstruksi,” Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan PUPR Wilayah III Jakarta, Jakarta, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Wirahadikusumah, “Era Baru Konstruksi: Berkarya Menuju Indonesia Maju,” in Buku Konstruksi Indonesia - Buku 1, Jakrta, Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, 2021, p. 17. [Google Scholar]
  18. Prabhu, Civil Engineering: An Introduction to Civil Engineering, India: NestFame Creations Pvt Ltd., 2021. [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Evans, B. Godart, J. Krieger, J.-B. Kovarik, M. Mimram and F. Palhol, “Builiding Resilient Infrastructure,” in Economic Effects of Infrastructure Investment and Its Financing, Tokyo, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Layanan Informasi BPIW, “2023, Sektor Konstruksi Serap 8.769.798 Tenaga Kerja,” PU-net, January 2022. [Online]. Available: https://bpiw.pu.go.id/article/detail/2023-sektor-konstruksi-serap-8769798-tenaga-kerja. [Accessed Sep 2023]. [Google Scholar]
  21. Badan Pusat Statistik, “Banyaknya Perusahaan Konstruksi 2019-2021,” Badan Pusat Statistik, [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/4/216/1/banyaknya-perusahaan-konstruksi.html. [Accessed September 2023]. [Google Scholar]
  22. H. W. Heinrich, D. Peterson and N. Roon, Indsutrian Accident Pervention. 5th Edition, New York: McGraw Hill, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Adriatna, M. Hum, S. Astono, M. Fetiaz, Subhan, C. A. O. Sugistria, H. Prayitno, R. I. Khair, A. Brando dan B. A. Putri, PROFIL KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA NASIONAL INDONESIA TAHUN 2022, Jakarta: Kementrian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. R. Hale, B. J. M. Ale, L. H. J. Goossens, T. Heijer, L. J. Bellamy, M. L. Mud, A. Roelen, H. J. Post, I. A. Papazoglou, A. Bloemhoff dan J. I. H. Oh, “Modeling accident for priotizing prevention,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1701–1715, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Winge and E. Albrechtsen, “Accident types and barrier failures in the construction industry,” Safety Science, vol. 105, pp. 158–166, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. R. A. Haslam, S. A. Hide, A. G. F. Gibb, D. E. Gyi, T. Pavitt, S. Atkinson and A. R. Duff, “Contributing factors in construction accidents,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 401–451, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. V. V. Khanzode, J. Maiti dan P. K. Ray, “Occupational injury and accident research: a comprehensive review,” Safety Science, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1355–1367, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Winge, E. Albrechtsen dan B. A. Mostue, “Causal factors and connections in construction accidents,” Safety Science, vol. 112, pp. 130–141, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Golizadeh, C. K. H. Hon, R. Drogemuller dan M. R. Hosseini, “Digital engineering potential in addressing causes of construction accidents,” Automaton in Construction, vol. 95, pp. 284–295, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. W. Gati, I. Wahyuni and Ekawati, “Analisis Penyebab Human Error Terhadap Kejadian Kecelakaan pada Teknisi di Perusahaan Otomotif X, Semarang,” Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 665–671, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. B. G. Kanki, “Cognitive Function and Human Error,” in Space Safety and Human Performance, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 17–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Dorner and C. D. Guss, “Human error in complex problem solving and dynamic decision making: A taxonomy of 24 errors and a theory,” Computer in Human Behavior Reports, vol. 7, no. 100222, pp. 1–17, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. J. Rasmussen, “Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 257–266, 1983. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Preventing Human Error in Process Safety, New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Reason, Human Error, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. N. Muecklich, I. Sikora, A. Paraskevas and A. Pandhra, “The role of human factors in aviation ground operation-related accidents/ incidents: A human error analysis approach,” Transportation Engineering, vol. 13, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  37. D. Dörner and C. D. Güss, “Human error in complex problem solving and dynamic decision making: A taxonomy of 24 errors and a theory,” Computers in Human Behavior Reports, vol. 7, 2022.. [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Chaplin, Kamus Lengkap Psikologi (Alih bahasa Kartini Kartono), Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  39. R. M. Spielman, W. Jenkins and M. Lovett, Psychology 2e, Open Access Textbooks, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  40. H. Ellis and R. Hunt, Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology, William C Brown Pub, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  41. M. W. Eynseck and M. Brysbaert, Fundamentals of Cognition 3rd Ed., New York: Routledge, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  42. D. Moriarty, Practical Human Factors for Pilots, Academic Press, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  43. Z. Li, X. Bao, Y. Sheng and Y. Xia, “Research on Unsafe Behavior of Construction Workers Under the Bidirectional Effect of Formal Rule Awareness and Conformity Mentality,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  44. Y. Gui, Y. Hongzhe, F. Xinyi, L. Yuanli and C. liying, “Simulation study on causes of cognitive failure of construction workers’ unsafe behavior,” China Safety Science Journal, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 6–12, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  45. Health and Safety Executive, Reducing Error and Influencing Behaviour, United Kingdom: The Stationery Office, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  46. P. Hughes and E. Ferret, Introduction to Health and Safety at Work: for the NEBOSH National General Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety, Routledge, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. C. Berlin and C. Adams, Production Ergonomics: Designing Work Systems to Support Optimal Human Performance, London: Ubiquity Press, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Wu, L. Hou, H. Chen, G. Zhang, Y. Zou and Q. Tushar, “Cognitive ergonomics-based Augmented Reality application for construction performance,” Automation in Construction, vol. 149, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  49. R. M. Spielman, K. Dumper, W. Jenkins, A. Lacombe, M. Lovett and a. M. Perlmutter, Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience, British Columbia: BCcampus, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  50. OpenStax College, Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience, Florida: University of Central Florida, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  51. W. J. M. Van Bommel, “Non-visual biological effect of lighting and the practical meaning for lighting for work,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 461–466, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. N. Castilla, J. L. Higuera-Trujillo and C. Llinares, “Exploring Lighting Conditions to Reduce Energy Consumption AND Improve Cognitive Performance Using Immersive Virtual Environments,” Energy and Buildings, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  53. S. M. Marcora, W. Staiano and M. Merlini, “A Randomized Controlled Trial of Brain Endurance Training (BET) to Reduce Fatigue During Endurance Exercise,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 47, p. 198, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. W. Staiano, S. Marcora, M. Romagnoli, U. Kirk and C. Ring, “Brain Endurance Training improves endurance and cognitive performance in road cyclists,” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 375–385, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. S. Xu, M. Sun, W. Fang, K. Chen, H. Luo and P. X. Zou, “A Bayesian-based knowledge tracing model for improving safety training outcomes in construction: An adaptive learning framework,” Developments in the Built Environment, vol. 13, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  56. Y. Wang, Y. Huang, B. Gu, S. Cao and D. Fang, “Identifying mental fatigue of construction workers using EEG and deep learning,” Automation in Construction, vol. 151, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  57. H. Fauzi, R. Rizqullah, M. Arianti and I. A. Hadyningtyas, “Neuromarketing Study: The Effect of Jingle on Consumer,” ASEAN Marketing Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. S. Saedi, A. A. F. Fini, M. Khanzadi, J. Wong, M. Sheikhkhoshkar and M. Banaei, “Applications of electroencephalography in construction,” Auutomation in Construction, vol. 133, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  59. M. X. Cohen, “It’s about time,” Front Hum Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 2, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. G. Lee and S. Lee, “Feasibility of a Mobile Electroencephalogram (EEG) Sensor-Based Stress Type Classification for Construction Workers,” in Construction Research Congress 2022, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  61. J. Ke, P. Liao, J. Li and X. Luo, “Effect of information load and cognitive style on cognitive load of visualized dashboards for construction-related activities,” Automation in Construction, vol. 154, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  62. S. H. Pauline and S. Dhanalaksmi, “A robust low-cost adaptive filtering technique for phonocardiogram signal denoising,” Signal Processing, vol. 201, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  63. Z. Liu and S. Li, “A sound monitoring system for prevention of underground pipeline damage caused by construction,” Automation in Construction, vol. 113, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  64. C. Huimin, Z. Ruimei and H. Yanli, “Improved Threshold Denoising Method Based on Wavelet Transform,” Physics Procedia, vol. 33, pp. 1354–1359, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Z. Peng, Q. Kong, C. Yuan, R. Li and H.-L. Chi, “Development of acoustic denoising learning network for communication enhancement in construction sites,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 56, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  66. S. Saleh, W. Susan and B. Anila, “The Use of Noise Dampening Mats to Reduce Heavy-Equipment Noise,” Safety and Health at Work, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 226–230, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. C. Biotto, B. Mota, L. Araujo, G. Barbosa and F. Andrade, “Adapted Use Of Andon In A Horizontal Residential Construction Project,” in IGLC 2013, Fortaleza, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  68. S. Kemmer, M. Saraiva, L. Heineck, A. Pacheco, M. Novaes, C. Mourão and L. Moreira, “The Use of Andon in High Rise Building,” in 14th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Santiago, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  69. C. P. Valente, M. d. V. Novaes, C. A. M. d. A. Mourão and J. d. P. B. Neto, “Lean Monitoring and Evaluation in a Construction Site: A Proposal of Lean Audits,” in 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, San Diego, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  70. J. S. Yi, Y. W. Kim, K. A. Kim and B. Koo, “A suggested color scheme for reducing perception related accidents on construction work sites,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 48, pp. 185–192, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. M. Afifuddin, Melaksanakan Prosedur Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja, Purwodadi: CV. Sarnu Untung, 2019. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.