Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 190, 2024
2024 International Conference on Educational Development and Social Sciences (EDSS 2024)
Article Number 03021
Number of page(s) 8
Section Intelligent Technology Development and Talent Cultivation
Published online 18 April 2024
  1. Schiedrig T., Tietze F., Herstatt C.. Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review[J]. R & D Management, 2012(42):180–192 [Google Scholar]
  2. Project Comprehensive Report Writing Group, He J., Xie Z., et al. “Comprehensive Report on Research on China's Long-Term Low-Carbon Development Strategy and Transition Path” [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(11): 25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu Q., Yu S., Huang G.. Dynamic Evolutionary Game Simulation Analysis of Government Carbon Regulation and Carbon Emission Reduction Strategy of Heavy Polluting Enterprises [J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology: Natural Science, 2022, 36(1): 13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li J. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government Regulation of Enterprises Adopting Low-Carbon Power Generation Technology [D]. University of Science and Technology of China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng F., Shao S.. Research on the Implementation of Enterprise-Initiated Carbon Emission Reduction Innovation Strategy Based on Stage Division [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(8): 9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li Y.. Research on Enterprise Behavior and Low-Carbon Supply Chain Contract Coordination under Government Regulation [D]. Tianjin University. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang K., Shen J., Xu S., et al. Research on GovernmentEnterprise Evolutionary Game and Strategy in Carbon Emission Regulation: Based on the Perspective of Third- Party Supervision [J]. Journal of Chongqing University: Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 26(4): 11. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang L., Wang F., Zeng A.. Research on Third-Party Verification Mechanism of EU and US Carbon Markets and Its Implications for China [J]. Quality and Certification, 2019, 000(002): 62–64. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ozusaglam S.. Environmental innovation: a concise review of the literature[J]. Vie & Sciences De Lentreprise, 2012, 191-192(2):15–38. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li P., Mu X.. Analysis of the Lag and Optimal Environmental Regulation Intensity of the Porter Hypothesis: Based on System GMM and the Test of Threshold Effect [J]. Industrial Economic Research, 2013(4): 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  11. Luo X., Zhang Y.. Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure, Company Performance, and Government Subsidies: An Empirical Study of the Mining Industry Based on the CDP Project [J]. Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics, 2017, 33(2): 6. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li W., Bi K., Sun B.. Research on the Impact of Environmental Regulation Intensity on Green Technology Innovation in Pollution-Intensive Industries: An Empirical Test Based on Panel Data from 2003 to 2010 [J]. Research and Development Management, 2013, 25(6): 72–81. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cai L., Wang H., Zeng W. Mixed-strategy game simulation on environmental pollution based on system dynamic. Control and Decision Conference, 2008.Ccdc.2008:2199-2204 [Google Scholar]
  14. Pan F., Xi B., Wang L.. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Environmental Regulation Strategies Between Local Governments [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(6): 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu X., Cong L.. Enterprise Technology Innovation Strategy and Government R&D Subsidies: A Dynamic Game Model Based on Imperfect Information [J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2012, 33(2): 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ji G., Liu H.. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Product Eco-Innovation for Remanufacturing [J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2013, 34(6): 66–75. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.