Open Access
Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 09005 | |
Number of page(s) | 12 | |
Section | Phonétique, phonologie et interfaces | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419109005 | |
Published online | 28 June 2024 |
- Adda-Decker, M., & Lamel, L. (2000). The use of lexica in automatic speech recognition. In F. Van Eynde & D. Gibbon (éds.), Lexicon Development for Speech and Language Processing (pp. 235–266). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Boersma, P. (2007). Some listener-oriented accounts of h-aspiré in French. Lingua, 117, 1989–2054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2023). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.4, http://www.praat.org/. [Google Scholar]
- Coleman, J., Libermann, M., Kochanski, G., Yuan, J., Grau, S., Cieri, C., Baghai-Ravary, L., & Burnard, L. (2011). Mining years and years of speech. Final report of the Digging into Data project “Mining a Year of Speech.” University of Oxford Phonetics Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
- Cornulier, B. de. (1981). H-aspirée et la syllabation. Expressions disjonctives. In D. Goyvaerts (éd.), Phonology in the 1980’s (pp. 183–230). Story-Scientia. [Google Scholar]
- Côté, M.-H. (2008). Empty elements in schwa, liaison and h-aspiré: The French Holy Trinity revisited. In J. Hartmann (éd.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology (pp. 61–103). Brill. [Google Scholar]
- Durand, J., Laks, B. & Lyche, C. (2002). La phonologie du français contemporain: usages, variétés et structure. In C. Pusch & W. Raible (éds.), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik- Korpora und gesprochene Sprache/Romance Corpus Linguistics – Corpora and Spoken Language (pp. 93–106). Gunter Narr Verlag. [Google Scholar]
- Fouché, P. (1959). Traité de prononciation française (2e éd.). Paris: Klincksieck. [Google Scholar]
- Gabriel, C., & Meisenburg, T. (2009). Silent onsets? An optimality-theoretic approach to French h aspiré words. In F. Kügler, C. Féry & R. van de Vijver (éds.), Variation and gradience in phonetics and phonology (pp. 163–184). Mouton de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Galliano, S., Geoffrois, E., Mostefa, D., Choukri, K., Bonastre, J.-F., & Gravier, G. (2005). The ESTER Phase II Evaluation Campaign for the Rich Transcription of French Broadcast News. Proceedings of ISCA Interspeech, 1149–1152. [Google Scholar]
- Gauvain, J.-L., Lamel, L., & Adda, G. (2002). The LIMSI broadcast news transcription system. Speech Communication, 37(1–2), 89–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Göhring, T. (2017). L’état actuel du h disjonctif (h aspiré): Une approche fondée sur la fréquence d’emploi. Romanische Forschungen, 129(2), 147–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gravier, G., Adda, G., Paulson, N., Carré, M., Giraudel, A., & Galibert, O. (2012). The ETAPE corpus for the evaluation of speech-based TV content processing in the French language. Proceedings of LREC - 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 3995–3999. [Google Scholar]
- Green, J. N., & Hintze, M.-A. (2004). Le h aspiré en français contemporain: stabilité, variation ou déclin ? In A. Coveney, M.-A. Hintze, & C. Sanders (éds.), Variation et francophonie (pp. 241–280). L’Harmattan. [Google Scholar]
- Grevisse, M., & Goosse, A. (2008). Le bon usage. Grammaire française (14e éd.). De Boeck & Duculot. Morin, Y. C., & Kaye, J. (1982). The syntactic bases for French liaison. Journal of Linguistics, 18(2), 291–330. [Google Scholar]
- Pagliano, C. (2003). L’épenthèse consonantique en français : ce que la syntaxe, la sémantique et la morphologie peuvent faire à la phonologie : parles-en de ta numérotation ?impossible. Thèse de l’Université de Nice. PFC = Phonologie du Français Contemporain, [Google Scholar]
- Plénat, M. (1995). Une approche prosodique de la morphologie du verlan. Lingua, 95, 97–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R Cor. Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/www.rstudio.com [Google Scholar]
- Schane, S. (1978). L’emploi des frontières de mots en français. In B. de Cornulier & F. Dell (éds.), Etudes de phonologie française (pp. 133–147). Editions du CNRS. [Google Scholar]
- Scheer, T. (à paraître). Glottal stop insertion and production planning domains in French. The Linguistic Review. [Google Scholar]
- Straka, M., & Strakova, J. (2017). Tokenizing, POS Tagging, Lemmatizing and Parsing UD 2.0 with UDPipe. Proceedings of the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies, 88–99. [Google Scholar]
- Tessier, A.-M., Jesney, K., Vesik, K., Lo, R., & Bouchard, M.-E. (2023). The Productive Status of Laurentian French Liaison: Variation across Words and Grammar. Proceedings of the 2022 Annual Meeting on Phonology. [Google Scholar]
- Torreira, F., Adda-Decker, M., & Ernestus, M. (2010). The Nijmegen corpus of casual French. Speech Communication, 10(3), 201–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tranel, B., Del Gobbo, F. (2002). Local Conjunction in Italian and French Phonology. In C. R. Wiltshire & J. Camps (éds.), Romance Phonology and Variation (pp. 191–218). Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
- von Heusinger, K., & Wespel, J. (2019). Indefinite proper names and quantification over manifestations. [Google Scholar]
- In E. Puig-Waldmüller (éd.), Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 11, 332–345. [Google Scholar]
- Wagner, M. (2012). Locality in Phonology and Production Planning. In A. McKillen & J. Loughran (éds.), Proceedings of the Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto (MOT) Phonology Workshop 2011. Phonology in the 21st Century: In Honour of Glyne Piggott. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 22). [Google Scholar]
- Zuraw, K., & Hayes, B. (2017). Intersecting constraint families: An argument for Harmonic Grammar. Language, 93(3), 497–548. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.