EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 196 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 196 (2024) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 196, 2024
2024 International Conference on Economic Development and Management Applications (EDMA2024)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Management Applications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419603002
Published online 26 August 2024
  1. Ashrafi, M., Acciaro, M., Walker, T. R., Magnan, G. M., & Adams, M. (2018). Corporate sustainability in Canadian and US maritime ports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.098 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. KPMG (2022) ‘Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022 – China Insights’, KPMG China, Available at: https://home.kpmg/cn/en/home.html (Accessed: 5 November 2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. Formentini, M. and Taticchi, P. (2016). Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 112, pp.1920-1933. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hawn, O., Chatterji, A.K. and Mitchell, W. (2018). Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), pp.949-976. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sancha, C., Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L., Tamayo-Torres, I. and Gimenez Thomsen, C. (2023), “From corporate governance to sustainability outcomes: the key role of operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 43 No. 13, pp. 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2022-0043 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Minciullo, M., Zaccone, M.C. and Pedrini, M. (2022). The antecedents of corporate sustainability performance: A study on generic and sustainability-related corporate governance mechanisms. Sustainability, 14(15), p.9761. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mayer, C. (1997). Corporate governance, competition, and performance. Journal of Law and Society, 24(1), pp.152-176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Filatotchev, I. and Nakajima, C. (2010). Internal and external corporate governance: An interface between an organization and its environment. British Journal of Management, 21(3), pp.591-606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liao, X.F. and Man, W.S. (2015). Research on the relationship between corporate governance and environmental performance: data from China’s listed manufacturing companies. Communication on Finance and Accounting: Next, (6), pp.40-43. [Google Scholar]
  10. Naveed, K., Voinea, C.L., Ali, Z., Rauf, F. and Fratostiteanu, C. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social performance in different industry groups: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(6), p.3142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nguyen, L.T., Doan, A.N. and Frömmel, M. (2021). Boards of directors and corporate sustainability performance: Evidence from the emerging East Asian markets. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18, pp.95-105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sabbaghi, O. (2016). Corporate governance in China: a review. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(5), pp.866-882. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, R., Wijen, F. and Heugens, P.P. (2018). Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), pp.403-428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of the Total Environment, 786, 147481. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chang, R. D., Zuo, J., Zhao, Z. Y., Zillante, G., Gan, X. L., & Soebarto, V. (2017). Evolving theories of sustainability and firms: History, future directions and implications for renewable energy research. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 48-56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fauzi, H., Svensson, G., & Rahman, A. A. (2010). “Triple bottom line” as “Sustainable corporate performance”: A proposition for the future. Sustainability, 2(5), 1345-1360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of business ethics, 149, 411-432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kouaib, A., Mhiri, S., & Jarboui, A. (2020). Board of directors’ effectiveness and sustainable performance: The triple bottom line. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 31(2), 100390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Clément, A., Robinot, É., & Trespeuch, L. (2022). Improving ESG scores with sustainability concepts. Sustainability, 14(20), 13154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khandelwal, V., Tripathi, P., Chotia, V., Srivastava, M., Sharma, P., & Kalyani, S. (2023). Examining the impact of agency issues on corporate performance: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(12), 497. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), pp.1-21. [Google Scholar]
  22. Abid, G., Khan, B., Rafiq, Z., & Ahmed, A. (2015). Theoretical perspectives of corporate governance. Bulletin for Business and Economics, 3(4), 166-175. [Google Scholar]
  23. Naciti, V., 2019. Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, p.117727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bonazzi, L., & Islam, S. M. (2007). Agency theory and corporate governance: A study of the effectiveness of board in their monitoring of the CEO. Journal of modelling in management, 2(1), 7-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Naveed, K. (2023). Board gender diversity and sustainability performance of firms in the Chinese context: a national level, sub-national level, and industry level analysis. In Open Universiteit research portal. Open Universiteits. https://research.ou.nl/en/publications/board-gender-diversity-and-sustainability-performance-of-firms-in. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nguyen, T. H., Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., & Wu, Y. (2021). Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2313-2331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Z.P. and Wang, Z.Q., 2013. Can independent director system in China improve the performance of listed firms in Shenzhen and Shanghai in 2010. Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics, 36(3), pp.73-77. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G., 2015. External control of organizations—Resource dependence perspective. In Organizational Behavior 2 (pp. 373-388). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hart, S.L. and Sharma, S., 2004. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), pp.7-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A., 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp.193-206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Haque, F. and Ntim, C.G., 2020. Executive compensation, sustainable compensation policy carbon performance and market value. British Journal of Management, 31(3), pp.525-546. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xie W.W., 2011. An analysis of the impact of corporate governance environment on corporate social responsibility. Modern Finance and Economics: Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, (1), pp.91-96. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin, L. and Puchniak, D.W., 2022. Institutional investors in China: Corporate governance and policy channeling in the market within the state. Colum. J. Asian L., 35, p.74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D.N. and Rui, O.M., 2006. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of corporate finance, 12(3), pp.424-448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, W. and Zhang, R., 2010. Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of business ethics, 96, pp.631-645. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shahab, Y., & Ye, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: Empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 15(2), 87-103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hussain, N., Rigoni, U. and Orij, R.P., 2018. Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of business ethics, 149, pp.411-432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G., 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), pp.1-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269-290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2006). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 836-863. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H., 2019. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77-132). Gower. [Google Scholar]
  46. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.