Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 196, 2024
2024 International Conference on Economic Development and Management Applications (EDMA2024)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Management Applications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419603003
Published online 26 August 2024
  1. Tu Y, Lu X, Choi J N, et al.(2019) Ethical eadership and team-level creativity: mediation of psychological safety climate and moderation of supervisor support for creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 159: 551-565. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kristof-Brown A L, Zimmerman R D, Johnson E C. (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58: 281-342. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crawford E R, Lepine J A, Rich B L. (2010) Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 834-848. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Teng F. (2020) Employment discrimination of managers: the impact of abusive management differentiation. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 42: 121-129. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wan M, Shaffer M A, Zhang Y, Singh R.(2024) Unpacking daily changes in role overload and work–family balance satisfaction: A latent growth modeling approach. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 73: 351-380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Song J Y, Zhang L X, Zhang L T. (2020) Mechanism of work-family dual conflict affects innovation behavior of knowledge workers. Management Review, 32: 215-225. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tan C P, Shen H H, Zhang Y Q. (2022) the burden mechanism of leaders excessive empowerment on employees’ innovative behaviors. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 39: 141-149. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fischer S, Frese M, Mertins J C, et al. (2018) The role of error management culture for firm and individual innovativeness. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 67: 428-453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kong L, Li X Y, Zhang F W. (2020) The influence of Inclusive leadership on employees’ proactive behavior: the mediating effects of organizational-based self-esteem and error management climate. Management Review, 32: 232-243. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gronewold U, Gold A, Salterio S. (2013) Reporting self-made errors: the impact of organizational error-management climate and error type. Journal of Business Ethics, 117: 189-208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang Y Z. (2018) Research on the relationship between coaching leadership and employee innovative behavior: multilevel role of error management climate. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 39: 115-129. [Google Scholar]
  12. Vidyarthi P R, Liden R C, Anand S, et al. (2010) Where do I stand? examining the effects of leader-member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 849-861. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. (2005) The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 139: 439-457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang C K, Hu Z F, Liu Y. (2001) Evidencs for reliability and validity of the Chinese version of general selfEfficacy scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 7: 37-40. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schaubroeck J, Jennings C. (1989) Antecedents and consequences of role stress: a covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10: 35-58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scott S G, Bruce R A. (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 580-607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cigularov K P, Chen P Y, Rosecrance J. (2010) The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety: a multi-level study. Accid Anal Prev, 42: 1498-1506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang N J, Yuan M S, Fu C X et al. (2015) the relationship between error management climate and individual innovative behavior. Science Research Management, 36: 94-101. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.