EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 201 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 201 (2024) 01008 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 201, 2024
1st International Conference on Digital Technologies and Sustainability Accounting (ICDSA 2024)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 10
Section Sustainable Accounting and Finance Policy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420101008
Published online 08 November 2024
  1. M. E. Barth, S. F. Cahan, L. Chen, and E. R. Venter, The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality: Capital market and real effects. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 62, 43–64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. I. M. García-Sánchez and L. Noguera-Gámez, Integrated reporting and stakeholder engagement: The effect on information asymmetry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 24, 5, 395–413 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1415 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Oktorina, S. V. Siregar, D. Adhariani, and A. F. Mita, The diffusion and adoption of integrated reporting: a cross-country analysis on the déterminants. Meditari Account. Res. 30, 1, 39–73 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0660 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. A. Mawardani and I. Harymawan, The relationship between corporate governance and integrated reporting. J. Account. Invest. 22, 1, 51–79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v22i1.9694 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Sofian and M. Dumitru, The compliance of the integrated reports issued by European financial companies with the International Integrated Reporting Framework. Sustain. 9, 8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081319 [Google Scholar]
  6. IIRC, About the IIRC about integrated reporting (2013). www.theiirc.org [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Raimo, F. Vitolla, A. Marrone, and M. Rubino, The role of ownership structure in integrated reporting policies. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 29, 6, 2238–2250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2498 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. O. O. Iredele, Examining the association between quality of integrated reports and corporate characteristics. Heliyon. 5, 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01932 [Google Scholar]
  9. K. W. Lee and G. H. H. Yeo, The association between integrated reporting and firm valuation. Rev. Quant. Financ. Account. 47, 4, 1221–1250 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-015-0536-y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. F. Dosinta and H. Brata, Politik penamaan dalam pelaporan korporat pasca implementasi integrated reporting. J. Akunt. Multiparadigma. 11, 1, (2020). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2020.11.1.09 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gautama, Fransiskus E. Daromes, and Suwandi N, Peran moderasi kompetensi komita audit padahubungan antara struktur kepemilikan dan kualitaspelaporan keuangan. J. Akunt. 11, 1 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Dyck, K. V. Lins, L. Roth, and H. F. Wagner, Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. financ. econ. 131, 3, 693–714 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. P. Sari, Peran Kepemilikan Asing, Leverage dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Pengungkapan Coorporate Social Responsibility Perusahaan. Ekon. J. Econ. Bus. 4, 1, 154 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v4i1.132 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Utami, R. Amyulianthy, and T. Astuti, Pelaporan yang terintegrasi di rev. 4.0: siapkah BUMN di Indonesia?. J. Reviu Akunt. dan Keuang. 12, 2, 276–293 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i2.21444 [Google Scholar]
  15. IAPI, Integrated reporting. (2020). https://iapi.or.id/integrated-reporting/ [Google Scholar]
  16. M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling, Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Q North-Holland Publishing Company (1976) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Ararat, Corporate governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research. (2021). http://ssrn.com/abstract=xxx [Google Scholar]
  18. J. J. Cordeiro, A. Galeazzo, T. S. Shaw, R. Veliyath, and M. K. Nandakumar, Ownership influences on corporate social responsibility in the Indian context. Asia Pacific J. Manag. 35, 4, 1107–1136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9546-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Disli, M. K. Yilmaz, and F. F. M. Mohamed, Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets. Sustain. Accounting, Manag. Policy J. 13, 4, 929–952 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2020-0313 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R.-S. Liou, P.-H. Ting, and Y.-Y. Chen, The cost of foreign ownership: Voluntary sustainability reporting and financial performance in an emerging economy. Cross Cult. Strateg. Manag (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-09-2021-0165 [Google Scholar]
  21. D. R. Wijayani, N. A. Budiman, and S. Mulyani, Pengaruh corporate governance terhadap voluntary disclosure (study kasus pada perusahaan manufaktur di bursa efek Indonesia pada tahun). Maj. Ilm. Solusi. 17, 4 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. R. La Porta, F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, American Finance Association Corporate Ownership around the World (1999) [Google Scholar]
  23. F. N. Latifah and J. Widiatmoko, Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan terhadap corporate social responsibility dan dampaknya pada nilai. JIMAT (Jurnal Ilm. Mhs. Akunt). 13, 3, 921–937 (2022). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/S1ak/article/download/44363/23224 [Google Scholar]
  24. J. A. Correa-Garcia, M. A. Garcia-Benau, and E. Garcia-Meca, Corporate governance and its implications for sustainability reporting quality in Latin American business groups. J. Clean. Prod. 260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12114 [Google Scholar]
  25. H. C. Nguyen, P. M. H. Nguyen, B. H. Tran, T. T. N. Nguyen, L. T. T. Hoang, and T. T. H. Do, Integrated reporting disclosure alignment levels in annual reports by listed firms in Vietnam and influencing factors. Meditari Account. Res. 30, 6, 1543–1570 (2022). https://doi.org/0.1108/MEDAR-02-2020-0710 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Alhazaimeh, R. Palaniappan, and M. Almsafir, The Impact of corporate governance and ownership structure on voluntary disclosure in annual reports among listed Jordanian companies. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 129, 341–348 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.686 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dani and Purwanti, Pengaruh jumlah dan keahlian komite audit terhadap pengungkapan integrated reporting pada perusahaan pertambangan yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia. J. Ilm. Mhs. FEB Univ. Brawijaya. 10, 1 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Velte, Is audit committee expertise connected with increased readability of integrated reports: Evidence from EU companies. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 16, 2, 23–41 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.03 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sultana and Zahn, Earnings conservatism and audit committee financial expertise. Account. Financ. 55, 1, 279–310 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12042 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. O. Erin and A. Adegboye, Do corporate attributes impact integrated reporting quality? An empirical evidence. J. Financ. Report. Account. 20, 3-4, 416–445 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2020-0117 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Chariri and I. Januarti, Audit committee characteristics and integrated reporting: Empirical study of companies listed on the Johannesburg stock exchange (2017) [Google Scholar]
  32. W. M. Albassam and C. G. Ntim, The effect of Islamic values on voluntary corporate governance disclosure: The case of Saudi-listed firms. J. Islam. Account. Bus. Res. 8, 2, 182–202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2015-0046 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. I. Karamanou and N. Vafeas, The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. J. Account. Res. 43, 3, 453–486 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2005.00177.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Mandalika, H. Hermanto, and L. Handajani, Pengaruh corporate governance terhadap luas pengungkapan integrated reporting dan implikasinya terhadap nilai perusahaan. EJurnal Akunt. 30, 3, 556 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i03.p01 [Google Scholar]
  35. N. W. Rustiani, Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan saham pada pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. J. Ilm. Akunt. dan Bisnis. 6, 1 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  36. A. H. Abogazia, H. A. Hashim, Z. Salleh, and A. A. Ettish, The moderating effect of external financing on the relationship between integrated reporting and firm value in Egypt. J. Financ. Report. Account (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2022-0195 [Google Scholar]
  37. D. Soegiarto, Y. Novianti, and Z. M. Delima, Pengaruh profitabilitas (ROA), leverage, borad size, gender diversity, dan struktur kepemilikan terhadap integrated reporting. J. Keuang. dan Bisnis. 20, 1, 95–105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.32524/jkb.v20i1.413 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ahmad and Sari, Pengaruh komite audit, ukuran perusahaan, ukuran kap terhadap tingkat keselarasan laporan tahunan dengan rerangka integrated reporting. J. Nominal. VI, 2 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  39. Mitchell, Agle, and Wood, Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22, 4, 853–886 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035597 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. R. Asyirin, N. Ariani, H. A. Paminto, M. Nadir, and M. Si, Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan saham terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (csr) pada perusahaan manufaktur (sektor industri barang konsumsi) yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia. J. Manaj. Akunt. 3, 1, 1–23 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  41. Kardiyanti and Dwirandra, Pengaruh profitabilitas, ukuran perusahaan, dan kepemilikan asing pada pengungkapan csr. E-Jurnal Akunt. 30, 9, 2338 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i09.p13fea [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. A. D. Kirana and A. B. Prasetyo, Analyzing board characteristics, ownership structure and company characteristic to csr disclosure. Account. Anal. J. 10, 1, 62–70 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v10i1.41944 [Google Scholar]
  43. A. P. Ningrum and Y. W. Prihatiningtias, Pengaruh tata kelola korporat terhadap pengungkapan laporan keberlanjutan (studi pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di perhitungan indeks saham SRI-KEHATI tahun 2010-2014). J. Ilm. Mhs. FEB Univ. Brawijaya. 4, 1, 1–17 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  44. Sandri, Prihatni, and Armeliza, Pengaruh kepemilikan asing, kepemilikan keluarga dan tekanan karyawan terhadap pengungkapan laporan keberlanjutan. 2, 3, 661–678 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  45. Risty and Sany, Pengaruh independensi, keahlian, frekuensi rapat, dan jumlah anggota komite audit terhadap penerbitan sustainability report ISRA 2008-2012. Bus. Account. Rev. 3, 1, 1–10 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  46. Setiawan and Ridaryanto, Analisis pengaruh efetifitas dewan komisaris dan komite audit terhadap kualitas sustainability report. Balanc. J. Akuntansi, Audit. dan Keuang. 19, 1, 126–149 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. M. W. Ningsih and H. Laksito, Pengaruh karakteristik komite audit terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual. Diponegoro J. Account. 3, 1, 1 (2014). http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting [Google Scholar]
  48. A. A. Haji and M. Anifowose, Audit committee and integrated reporting practice: does internal assurance matter?. Manag. Audit. J. 31, 8–9, 915–948 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2015-1293 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. F. N. Pudjianti and I. Ghozali, Pengaruh karakteristik komite audit terhadap risiko sebagai variabel intervening. Diponegoro J. Account. 10, 1, 1–13 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  50. G. N. Fitri, Pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibiity pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di BEI. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53, 9, 1689–1699 (2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.