EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 201 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 201 (2024) 04004 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 201, 2024
1st International Conference on Digital Technologies and Sustainability Accounting (ICDSA 2024)
Article Number 04004
Number of page(s) 18
Section Sustainability Disclosure Standards
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420104004
Published online 08 November 2024
  1. Silmilian. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Aparatur Pemerintah dengan Motivasi Kerja dan Internal Locus of Control sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Empiris pada SKPD Pemerintah Daerah Kota Padang). Jurnal Akuntansi. vol. 1, no 1. Pp.1–20 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. P. L. Natalia et al. Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Transparansi, dan Pengendalian Akuntansi terhadap Kinerja Manajerial pada Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Going Concern. vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 115–121 (2019). Available: https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.14.1.22312.2019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Aprilia. Pengaruh Partisipisasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Komitmen Organisasi, Locus Of Control, dan Akuntabilitas Publik terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris pada Puskesmas Se-Kabupaten Magelang). Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Darmawan. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Publik, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Desentralisasi dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial di SKPD Kabupaten Bengkalis. Jom Fekon. vol. 3, no.1, Feb. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. T. Hall et al. An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. vol. 38, no. 2, Sep. (2015). Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/job. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Mauliza et al. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran, Akuntabilitas dan Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran terhadap Kinerja dengan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Moderating pada Manajerial Majelis Pendidikan Daerah. JRAK Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis. vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–26. Jan (2022). [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Cholifah and Jane. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, dan Akuntabilitas terhadap Kinerja Mmanagerial dengan Satuan Pengawasan Internal sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Kasus pada Pemerintah Kota Semarang 2022). COSTING: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting. vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1702–1714, (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Y. Ningsih and I. B. Riharjo. Pengaruh Penganggaran Kinerja, Transparansi, Akuntabilitas, dan Penganggaran Partisipatif terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi. vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1–17. Jan (2020). [Google Scholar]
  9. M. S. Macinati et al. Medical Managers’ Financial Accountability: The Effects of Feedback on Work Outcome and Managerial Performance. Financial Accountability & Management in Government, Public Services, and Charities. vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–24 (2020). Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12285 [Google Scholar]
  10. Mardiasmo, Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit Andi (2018). [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Donaldson and J. H. Davis. Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management. vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 48–64, (1991). Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. A. Abernethy and A. M Lillis. The Impact of Manufacturing Flexibility on Management Control System Design. Accounting, Organizations and Societ. vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 241–258, May (1995). Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)E0014-L [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. H. Manurung et al. Manajemen: Teori dan Perkembangannya. Jakarta: PT Adler Manurung Press (2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. Molina. Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance terhadap Kualitas Laba dengan Karakteristik Perusahaan dan Kualitas Audit sebagai Variabel Mediasi (Studi Empiris Lintas Negara di Asia Tenggara). Disertasi Thesis (2020). https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-casea7e576e1b6bf%0A https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100642">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100642 [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Govindarajan. Impact of Participation in the Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitudes and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency Perspectives. Decision Sciences. vol.17, no. 4, pp. 496–516, (1986). Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1986.tb00240.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. T. Hall et al. Relationships between Felt Accountability as A Stressor and Strain Reactions: The Neutralizing Role of Autonomy Across Two Studies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 87–99, Jan. (2006). Available: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.87 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. D. Mackey et al. Victim and culprit? The Effects of Entitlement and Felt Accountability on Perceptions of Abusive Supervision and Perpetration of Workplace Bullying. J. Bus. Ethics. vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 659–673. Dec. (2018). doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3348-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall, A. T., Zinko, R., Perryman, A.A., & Ferris, G. R. Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Reputation: Mediators in the Relationships Between Accountability and Job Performance and Satisfaction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studied, 13(4), 381–192 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Li et al. Dancing in Shackles: The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Felt Accountability on Work Outcomes and Individual Wellbeing. Front. Psychol. vol. 13, no. 904946. Pp. 1–11. June (2022). Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904946 [Google Scholar]
  20. I. A. A. Misdiantari and N. P. S. H. Mimba. Pengaruh Budgetary Goal Characteristics, Komitmen Organisasi, dan Motivasi pada Kinerja Manajerial dengan Gaya Kepemimpinan sebagai Variabel Moderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi. vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 2322–2350. June (2019). Available: https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v27.i03.p25 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mahoney et al. Development of Managerial Performance: A Research Approach. Cincinnati: South Western Publishing (1963). [Google Scholar]
  22. Ivance Vich, John M, Konopaske Robert & Matteson Michael T. Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi (Alih Bahasa Gina Gania). Edisi Tujuh. Jakarta: Erlangga (2008). [Google Scholar]
  23. Kadarisman, M. Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada (2013). [Google Scholar]
  24. R. F. Simamora et al. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Sasaran Anggaran, dan Akuntabilitas terhadap Kinerja Manajerial PT. Maju Bersama Mean (Cabang Kapten Muslim). Jurnal Ilmiah Core IT. vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 28–41 (2021). http://ijcoreit.org/index.php/coreit/article/view/301 [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Melia and V. F. Sari. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Publik, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran dan Partisipasi Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Solok Selatan). JEA: Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi. vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1068–1079. Aug (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Suryani and Pujiono. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Desentralisasi, dan Akuntabilitas Publik terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. COSTING: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting. vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 167–181. Sept. 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v4i1.1516 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Ossege. Accountability – are We Better off Without It?. Public Management Review. vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 585–607. April (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. N. Hidayah. Does Work Motivation Moderate the Relationship Between Responsibility Accounting, Competence, and Managerial Performance? JIFA (Journal of Islamic Finance and Accounting). vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Jan (2021). Available: https://doi.org/10.22515/jifa.v4i1.3665 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.