EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 202 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 202 (2024) 04005 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2024
The 1st International Conference on Environment and Smart Education (ICEnSE 2024)
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 11
Section Smart Learning Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420204005
Published online 14 November 2024
  1. M. Masyhuri, Mu. A. Subandi, Fitriah M., en Suud, “Journal of Critical Reviews THE CONCEPT OF HAPPINESS FOR ISLAMIC COMMUNITY OF MELAYU KAMPAR RIAU INDONESIA”, 2020, doi: 10.31838/jcr.07.12.147. [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Z. Abdillah, F. Rahman, M. Husna, C. Sitinjak, N. Hidayah, en M. Mujidin, “School Well-being in Terms of Self-Determination and Patience in Vocational High School Students”, Int. J. Islam. Educ. Psychol., vol 3, no 1, bll 19–34, Jul 2022, doi: 10.18196/ijiep.v3i1.14476. [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Taştan, Rethinking the third place: Could the book cafe be the social interaction catalyst for today’s people?, no January 2023. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. A. Johnson, “How do public libraries create social capital? An analysis of interactions between library staff and patrons”, Libr. Inf. Sci. Res., vol 34, no 1, bll 52–62, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2011.07.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. B. A. Barker Scott en M. R. Manning, “Designing the Collaborative Organization: A Framework for how Collaborative Work, Relationships, and Behaviors Generate Collaborative Capacity”, J. Appl. Behav. Sci., vol 60, no 1, bll 149–193, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00218863221106245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. M. Suud en T. Na’imah, “The effect of positive thinking training on academic stress of Muslim students in thesis writing: a quasi-experimental study”, Int. J. Adolesc. Youth, vol 28, no 1, Des 2023, doi: 10.1080/02673843.2023.2270051. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sarman, “Continuing education & professional development programmes/resources for library professionals”, IP Indian J. Libr. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol 3, no 1, bll 19–22, 2020, doi: 10.18231/2456-9623.2018.0006. [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Gunasekera, “Continuing Professional Development for Library Professionals in Sri Lanka: University Libraries Perspectives”, Libr. Philos. Pract., vol 2021, no March, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Kim en E. Yang, “Academic library spaces and student activities during the COVID-19 pandemic”, J. Acad. Librariansh., vol 48, no 4, bl 102529, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. Zheng, M. Zeng, W. Huang, en N. Sun, “The influence of university library environment on student interactions and college students’ learning engagement”, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol 11, no 1, bll 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02892-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. M. Yahaya en A. Abdullahi, “Integrating information and communication technology (ICT) in social interaction spaces of proposed public library Gwagwalada, AbujaNigeria”, Bayero J. Pure Appl. Sci., vol 14, no 1, bll 221–229, 2021, doi: 10.4314/bajopas.v14i1.26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. E. S. Budi en Hariyanti, “Penerapan Augmented Reality di Perpustakaan : Inovasi Interaksi Pemustaka dan Perpustakaan untuk Peningkatan Derajat Kesehatan”, Libr. J. Ilmu Perpust. dan Inf., vol 9, no 1, bll 105–117, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Gisela en D. Anggraini, “Wadah Interaksi Sosial Dan Sarana Kreatif Di Kemayoran, Jakarta Pusat”, J. Sains, Teknol. Urban, Perancangan, Arsit., vol 2, no 1, bl 1047, 2020, doi: 10.24912/stupa.v2i1.6782. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Yohanna, “The influence of social media on social interactions among students”, Indones. J. Soc. Sci., vol 12, no 2, bll 34–48, 2020, doi: 10.1142/S0219649220500239. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Wahyuni, “Interaksi Sosial Pustakawan Dengan Pemustaka pada UPT. Perpustakaan Universitas Serambi Mekkah Aceh”, LIBRIA, vol 11, no 2, bll 29–46, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. E. B. Santoso, S. de Yong, en D. T. Kayogi, “Perancangan Interior Café untuk Meningkatkan Interaksi Sosial di Surabaya”, Intra, vol 7, no 2, bll 1003–1010, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. R. Miller, H. Jun, F. Herrera, J. Y. Villa, G. Welch, en J. N. Bailenson, “Social interaction in augmented reality”, PLoS One, vol 14, no 5, bll 1–26, 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216290. [Google Scholar]
  18. O. Rodina, L. Gladkova, en O. Selivanova, “University students’ social interaction type specifics in the learning process”, SHS Web Conf., vol 69, bl 00093, 2019, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20196900093. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Bakhtiyar, “The Meaning of Social Interaction Through Social Networking as a Media Promotion of Modern Library Information Services in The Sociological Perspective”, Tibanndaru J. Ilmu Perpust. dan Inf., vol 3, no 2, bl 8, 2019, doi: 10.30742/tb.v3i2.762. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. B. Ginting, S. Suwarjo, J. S. Lumbanbatu, en D. O. Sihotang, “The Relationship between the Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and Social Media Use in Articulating Islamic Identity among Muslim Millennials”, Int. J. Islam. Educ. Psychol., vol 4, no 2, bll 261–275, Des 2023, doi: 10.18196/IJIEP.V4I2.18457. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. O’Kelly, L. Scott-Webber, J. Garrison, en K. Meyer, “Can a library building’s design cue new behaviors? A case study”, Portal, vol 17, no 4, bll 843–862, 2017, doi: 10.1353/pla.2017.0049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Bussell, “Students Experience Cognitive And Emotional Responses To Academic Library Spaces”, Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract., vol 16, no 3, bll 149–151, 2021, doi: 10.18438/eblip29988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. E. DeFrain en M. Hong, “Interiors, affect, and use: How does an academic library’s learning commons support students’ needs?”, Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract., vol 15, no 2, bll 42–68, 2020, doi: 10.18438/eblip29677. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Ellis en A. Phillips, “Re-defining the service experience: Forging collaboration between librarians and students”, Libr. Manag., 2013, doi: 10.1108/LM-10-2012-0070. [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Kannegiser, “Effects of an augmented reality library orientation on anxiety and self-efficacy: An exploratory study”, Coll. Res. Libr., 2021, doi: 10.5860/crl.82.3.352. [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Hirsch, I. Graf Von Silva-Tarouca, en R. Welsch, “Increasing Socio-Spatial Connectedness Among Students: A Location-Based AR Social Media Network Approach”, in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings, 2022, doi: 10.1145/3491101.3519681. [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Y. Chang, Y. S. Hsu, en H. K. Wu, “A comparison study of augmented reality versus interactive simulation technology to support student learning of a socio-scientific issue”, Interact. Learn. Environ., 2016, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.961486. [Google Scholar]
  28. E. Vázquez-Cano, V. Marín-Díaz, W. R. V. Oyarvide, en E. López-Meneses, “Use of augmented reality to improve specific and transversal competencies in students”, Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., 2020, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.8.21. [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Askarizad, “Evaluation of the Effective Factors on Social Interactions in the Design of Public Libraries”, Teh. Glas., vol 14, no 4, bll 403–410, 2020, doi: 10.31803/tg-20190525220939. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Bossaller, D. Oprean, A. Urban, en N. Riedel, “A happy ambience: Incorporating ba and flow in library design”, J. Acad. Librariansh., 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102228. [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Cox, “Factors Shaping Future Use and Design of Academic Library Space”, New Rev. Acad. Librariansh., vol 29, no 1, bll 33–50, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13614533.2022.2039244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. S. R. Cotten, “Students’ technology use and the impacts on well‐being”, New Dir. Student Serv., 2008, doi: 10.1002/ss.295. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.