Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 203, 2024
SCAN’24 - 11e Séminaire de Conception Architecturale Numérique AI & Architecture
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 15
Section Approches sociotechniques
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420301005
Published online 13 November 2024
  1. A. Luccioni, V. Schmidt, V. Vardanyan, Y. Bengio, Using artificial intelligence to visualize the impacts of climate change, IEEE Comp. Graph. App., 41, p. 8–14 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Tursic, The city as an aesthetic space, City, Taylor & Francis Journals, 23, p. 205–221 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. A.S. Bailly, La perception de l’espace urbain: les concepts, les méthodes d’étude, leur utilisation dans la recherche urbanistique, 264 p (1977) [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Gatta, (Contre) pouvoirs urbains ? Une critique des dispositifs non-institutionnels de l’aménagement urbain dans les transformations du Nord-Est de la métropole parisienne, Architecture, aménagement de l’espace, 423 p (2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. S.R Arnstein., A ladder of citizen participation, JAPA, 4 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Hatzfeld, Légitimité. In. I. Casillo, R. Barbier, L. Blondiaux, F. Chateauraynaud, J.-M. Fourniau, R. Lefebvre, C. Neveu, & D. Salles, Dictionnaire critique et interdisciplinaire de la Participation (2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.H. Bacqué, M. Gauthier, Participation, urbanisme et études urbaines, quatre décennies de débats et d'expériences depuis « A ladder of citizen participation » de S. R. Arnstein, Participations, 1, p. 36–66 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Nez, Nature et légitimités des savoirs citoyens dans l'urbanisme participatif. Une enquête ethnographique à Paris, Sociologie, 2, p. 387–404 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Pinson, in P. Lascoumes, et P. Le Gales, Gouverner par les instruments, 370 p (2005) [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Gatta, (Contre)pouvoirs urbains? Éléments pour une critique anthropologique de l’urbanisme participatif, 211 p (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Berditchevskaia, E. Malliaraki et K. Peach, Participatory AIfor Humanitarian Innovation. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Cachat-Rosset, A. Klarsfeld, Diversity, equity, and inclusion in artificial intelligence: an evaluation of guidelines. AAI, 37 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Haakman, L. Cruz, H. Huijgens, A. Van Deursen, AI lifecycle models need to be revised, ESE, 26 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. De Silva, D. Alahakoon, An artificial intelligence life cycle: from conception to production, Patterns, 3, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Gerdes, A participatory data-centric approach to AI ethics by design, AAI, 36 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Benthall. B. D. Haynes, Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, p.289–298, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Binns, Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, p. 514–524, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Hoffmann, V. Vogt, M.P. Hauer, K. Zweig, Fairness by awareness? On the inclusion of protected features in algorithmic decisions, CLSR, 44, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Lepri, N. Olrver, E. Letouzé, A. Pentland, P. Vinck, Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes: the premise, the proposed solutions, and the open challenges, Philosophy & Technology, 31, 611–627 [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Helbing, S. Mahajan, R.H. Fricker, A. Musso, C.I. Hausladen, C. Carissimo, D. Carpentras, E. Stockinger, J. Argota Sanchez-Vaquerizo, J.C. Yang, M.C. Ballandies, M. Korecki, R.K. Dubey, E. Pournaras, democracy by design: perspectives for digitally assisted, participatory, upgrades of Society, JCS, 71, (2023) [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. K. Dwivedi, L. Hughes, E. Ismagilova, G. Aarts, C. Coombs, T. Crick, Y. Duan, Y., R. Dwivedi, J. Edwards, A. Eirug, V. Galanos, P.V. Ilavarasan, M. Janssen, P. Jones, A.K. Kar, H. Kizgin, B. Kronemann, B. Lal, B., B. Lucini, M.D. Williams, Artificial Intelligence (AI): multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy, IJIM, 57, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  22. V. Beaudouin, I. Bloch, D. Bounie, S. Clémençon, F. d’Alché-Buc, J. Eagan, W. Maxwell, W.P. Mozharovskyi, J. Parekh, Flexible and Context-Specific AI Explainability: a multidisciplinary approach, arXiv (2020) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Birhane, W. Isaac, V. Prabhakaran, M. Díaz, M.C. Elish, I. Gabriel, S. Mohamed, Power of the people, opportunities and challenges for participatory AI, EAAMO (2022) [Google Scholar]
  24. P.M. Asaro, transforming society by transforming technology: The science and politics of participatory design, AMIT, 10, p.257–290 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Flanagan, H. Nissenbaum, Values at Play in Digital Games (2016) [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Jobin, M. Ienca, E. Vayena, The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines, NMI, 1(9), p.389–399 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Gehl, B. Svar, How to study public life. Methods in urban design, 200 p (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Ho, W.T. Ho, Scale development for environmental perception of public space, Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  29. A.M. Weber, T. Jorg, The Restorative Value of the Urban Environment: A Systematic Review of the Existing Literature, Environmental Health Insights, 12 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. W. White, The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces (2021) [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Tan, Q. Le, EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L. Li, J.L, K. Li, L. Fei-Fei, I mage Net: A large-scale hierarchical image, database, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2009). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.