EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 206 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 206 (2024) 01014 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 206, 2024
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2024 (ERPA 2024)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420601014
Published online 09 December 2024
  1. Sternberg, R.J., A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(4), 23 (2019). https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/7/4/23 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Piechowski, M., Emotional development and emotional giftedness. Handbook of gifted education/Allyn & Bacon, (1991). [Google Scholar]
  3. Silverman, L.K., The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper review, 17(2), 110–116 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553636 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hartsell, B., Teaching toward compassion: Environmental values education for secondary students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(4), 265–271 (2006). https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-406 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roeper, A., Should educators of the gifted and talented be more concerned with world issues? Roeper Review, 11(1), 12–13 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198809553151 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sternberg, R.J., Toxic giftedness. Roeper Review, 45(1), 61–73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2148311 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Olamafar, M.M., et al., Association between general intelligence, creativity and wisdom in gifted adolescents: empirical findings from a non-western country. Current Psychology, 42(16), 13744–13753 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02533-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sternberg, R.J., The vexing problem of dark giftedness. Gifted Education International, 39(3), 265–285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221110459 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deci, E. L. and R.M. Ryan, Nebraska symposium on motivation, in A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality, R. A. Dienstbier, Editor. University of Nebraska Press. 237–288 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  10. Erikson, E.H., Childhood and society. Vol. 2. (1963): Norton New York. [Google Scholar]
  11. Terry, A.W., et al., Vision with action: Developing sensitivity to societal concerns in gifted youth. Roeper Review, 30(1), 61–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190701836478 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berman, S., Children’s social consciousness and the development of social responsibility. (1997): State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wade, R. and K. Putnam, Tomorrow’s Leaders? Gifted High School Students’ Opinions of Student Council and Community Service. Roeper Review, 18, 150–151 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553721 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Berkowitz, M. W. and M.A. Hoppe, Character education and gifted children. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 131–142 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130903358493 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Andreani, O. and A. Pagnin, Nurturing the moral development of the gifted. International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent, 539–553 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  16. Karnes, F. A. and K.E. Brown, Moral development and the gifted: An initial investigation. Roeper Review, 3(4), 8–10 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198109552540 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Narváez, D., High achieving students and moral judgment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(3), 268–279 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329301600304 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sternberg, R. J. and M.I. Rodríguez-Fernández, Humanitarian giftedness. Gifted Education International, 40(1), 92–115 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294231167749 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sternberg, R.J., Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230–240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sternberg, R.J., Identify transformational, not just transactional giftedness! Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211037950 [Google Scholar]
  21. Subotnik, R.F., P. Olszewski-Kubilius, and F.C. Worrell, Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological science in the public interest, 12(1), 3–54 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sternberg, R.J., What universities can be: A new model for preparing students for active concerned citizenship and ethical leadership. (2016): Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501706318 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sternberg, R.J., ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 152–169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318658 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. De Bakker, F.G., P. Groenewegen, and F. Den Hond, A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & society, 44(3), 283–317 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278086 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Esen, M., M. S. Bellibas, and S. Gumus, The evolution of leadership research in higher education for two decades (1995-2014): A bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(3), 259–273 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1508753 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fahimnia, B., J. Sarkis, and H. Davarzani, Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International journal of production economics, 162, 101–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gülmez, D., İ. Özteke, and S. Gümüş, Uluslararası dergilerde yayımlanan Türkiye kaynaklı eğitim araştırmalarının genel görünümü: Bibliyometrik analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(206) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  28. Ciftci, S.K., et al., Map of Scientific Publication in the Field of Educational Sciences and Teacher Education in Turkey: A Bibliometric Study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 1097–1123 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  29. Zupic, I. and T. Čater, Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hallinger, P. and S. Suriyankietkaew, Science mapping of the knowledge base on sustainable leadership, 1990–2018. Sustainability, 10(12), 4846 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124846 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Eck, N. J. and L. Waltman, Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053–1070 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. White, H. D. and K.W. McCain, Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American society for information science, 49(4), 327–355 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10974571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4 [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, X., et al., A bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900–2010. Scientometrics, 92(3), 747–765 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0599-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nederhof, A., et al., Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 423–435 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017063 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Üsdiken, B. and Y. Pasadeos, Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: A comparison of co-citation networks. Organization studies, 16(3), 503–526 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gandrud, C., Getting Started with R, RStudio, and knitr. Reproducible Research with R and RStudio, 53–84 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600306 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gül, M. D. and Z. Ayık, Enrichment studies in gifted education: a bibliometric analysis with RStudio. Participatory Educational Research, 10(3), 266–284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.55.10.3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Aria, M. and C. Cuccurullo, bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959–975 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ambrose, D. and T.L. Cross, Morality, ethics, and gifted minds. Vol. 385 (2009): Springer. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gallagher, J.J., Political issues in gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(1), 77–89 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214565546 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.