Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 206, 2024
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2024 (ERPA 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01024 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420601024 | |
| Published online | 09 December 2024 | |
- Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 353–376, (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Topçu, M. S. Development of attitudes towards socioscientific issues scale for undergraduate students. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(1), 51–67, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Albe, V. Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17(8-9), 805–827, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, J.A., Arguing from Nature: The role of ‘nature’ in students’ argumentations on a socio-scientific issue, International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 723–744, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Walker, K., & Zeidler, D.L., Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry, International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387–1410, (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411–423, (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kolsto, S.D., Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689–1716, (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Van der Zande, P.A.M., Empowering teachers to teach socioscientific issues: the role of teacher identity in teaching. D. J. Boerwinkel, and A. J. Waarlo, (Eds.). Genomics Education for Decision making, FISME series on Research in Science Education, 117124, (2007). [Google Scholar]
- Dawson, V. M, A case study of the impact of introducing socio-scientific issues into a reproduction unit in a Catholic Girls’ school, New York: Springer Dordect, 313–345, (2011). [Google Scholar]
- MEB (Ministry of National Education). STEM education report. Ankara: Ministry of National Education, General Directorate of Innovation and Educational Technologies (YEĞİTEK), (2016). [Google Scholar]
- TÜSİAD (Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association). Liability disclosure report 2014-2015, (2014). Retrieved in October 2017 from http://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/8658-tusiad-2014-2015-sorumluluk-bildirimi-raporunu-yayimladi. [Google Scholar]
- Baran, E., Canbazoğlu-Bilici, S. and Mesutoğlu, C. Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) spot development event. Journal of Research Based Activity, 5(2), 60–69, (2004). [Google Scholar]
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, (2012). [Google Scholar]
- Gülhan, F. ve Şahin, F., Fen-Teknoloji-Mühendislik-Matematik entegrasyonunun (STEM) 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin bu alanlarla ilgili algı ve tutumlarına etkisi. International Journal of Human Science, 13(1), 602–620, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Çoban G., Akpınar E., Baran B. and Sağlam, Evaluation of “technological pedagogical content knowledge-based argumentation practices” training for science teachers. Education and Science, 41, 1–13, (2016). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.