EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 212 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 212 (2025) 04008 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 212, 2025
1st International Conference on Advanced Research in Sustainable Economic and Social Science (ICARSESS-24)
Article Number 04008
Number of page(s) 11
Section Social Science for Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521204008
Published online 05 March 2025
  1. D. P. K. Yogyakarta, Kajian Belanja Wisatawan Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 2020. Yogyakarta: Dinas Pariwisata Kota Yogyakarta, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://pariwisata.jogjakota.go.id/resources/download/laporan-analisis-belanja-wisatawan-kota-jogja-2020-75.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Zhang, K. Seshadri, V. P. D. Pattupogula, C. Badrinath, and S. Liu, “Visitors’ satisfaction towards indoor environmental quality in Australian hotels and serviced apartments,” Build Environ, vol. 244, no. June, p. 110819, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110819. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. B. A. Utari et al., “Tourist destination choice on five priority destinations of Indonesia during health crisis,” Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, vol. 32, no. June 2023, p. 100880, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100880. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. J. Yin, N. Zhang, and Z. Y. Chang, “Study on the impact of tourism quality perception on tourists’ environmentally responsible behaviour in rural tourism areas,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 626, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/626/1/012015. [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Chandran and P. Bhattacharya, “Perception of Visitors on Ecotourism Environmental impact : A Study of Munnar, Kerala, India,” World Journal of Environmental Biosciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.51847/abgia4pzsb. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. A. Junensih and Ratnawili, “Pengaruh Fasilitas Wisata, Harga dan Keamanan Terhadap Keputusan Berkunjung Wisatawan Pada Wisata Suban Air Panas Curup,” Jurnal Manajemen Modal Insani dan Bisnis (JMMIB), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 138–145, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Yurike, W. Wiryono, and A. Lestari, “Persepsi Pengunjung Dalam Pengembangan Wisata Alam Bukit Kandis Kabupaten Bengkulu Tengah,” Makila, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2024, doi: 10.30598/makila.v18i1.12250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D. T. Monik, S. P. Harianto, and A. Setiawan, “Analisis Persepsi Pengunjung Dan Masyarakat Dalam Pengembangan Objek Wisata Alam Air Terjun Way Lalaan,” Jurnal Hutan Tropis, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 311, 2021, doi: 10.20527/jht.v9i2.11279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. D. Rosa and G. Pradini, “Persepsi Wisatawan Terhadap Fasilitas Wisata Religi Masjid Istiqlal di Jakarta,” Peran Kepuasan Nasabah Dalam Memediasi Pengaruh Customer Relationship Marketing Terhadap Loyalitas Nasabah, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1161–1176324, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://bnr.bg/post/101787017/bsp-za-balgaria-e-pod-nomer-1-v-buletinata-za-vota-gerb-s-nomer-2-pp-db-s-nomer-12 [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Masykur, W. Widiartanto, and S. Saryadi, “Pengaruh Destination Image dan Fasilitas Wisata terhadap Revisit Intention (Studi pada Pengunjung Wisata Alam Seroja di Kabupaten Wonosobo),” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 170–179, 2022, doi: 10.14710/jiab.2022.34251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Caruana, “Service loyalty: The effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer satisfaction,” Eur J Mark, vol. 36, no. 7–8, pp. 811–828, 2002, doi: 10.1108/03090560210430818. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Q. Guo, X. Yang, and H. Xie, “The impacts of mountain campsite attributes on tourists’ satisfaction and behavioral intentions: The mediating role of experience quality,” Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, vol. 32, no. 52, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100873. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Jupri, D. Syirojulmunir, A. Firmansyah, E. S. Prasedya, and T. Rozi, “Rancang Bangun Papan Informasi Destinasi Wisata sebagai Penunjuk Lokasi Wisatawan di Desa Tetebatu Selatan Kecamatan Sikur Kabupaten Lombok Timur,” Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 380–385, 2021, doi: 10.29303/jpmpi.v5i1.1578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E. G. Rokhayah and Ana Noor Andriana, “Pengaruh Daya Tarik Wisata, Fasilitas, dan Aksesibilitas terhadap Keputusan Berkunjung Wisatawan di Pantai Istana Amal Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara,” Jurnal Kajian dan Terapan Pariwisata, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2021, doi: 10.53356/diparojs.v2i1.43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Ardiansyah and R. G. Maulida, “Kajian Atraksi, Amenitas, dan Aksesbilitas Untuk Pengembangan Kepariwisataan di Taman Wisata Alam Gunung Pancar Kabupaten Bogor,” Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 266–267, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. M. Masjhoer, “Partisipasi Pelaku Usaha Pariwisata dalam Pengelolaan Sampah di Pantai Pulang Sawal, Kabupaten Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta,” Jurnal Pariwisata Terapan, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 122, 2018, doi: 10.22146/jpt.43179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. P. Dewi, “Perancangan Sistem Pengelolaan Sampah Untuk Mendukung Perkembangan Industri Kreatif Di Daerah Pariwisata,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multi Disiplin Ilmu & Papers Unisbank Ke-3, vol. 3, no. Sendi_U 3, pp. 217–221, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Torres-Moraga, C. Rodriguez-Sanchez, M. Alonso-Dos-Santos, and A. Vidal, “Tourscape role in tourist destination sustainability: A path towards revisit,” Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, vol. 31, no. December 2023, p. 100863, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100863. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Fitri, H. F. Siregar, and A. S. P. Tarigan, “Peduli Lingkungan bagi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus (ABK) dengan Penerapan Tong Sampah Ceria,” Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan Corporate Social Responsibility (PKM-CSR), vol. 2, pp. 591–596, 2019, doi: 10.37695/pkmcsr.v2i0.451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Wahy and U. Muhamad Bahrul, “Rancang Bangun Sistemmonitoring. Kualitasairpada Budidaya.Ikan.Hias.Air.Tawar.Berbasis.Iot(Internet.of Things),” Jurnal Komputasi, vol. Vol 9, no. 2, pp. 67–75, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  21. L. L. Wati and S. Sudarti, “Analisis Perilaku Wisatawan Dalam Membuang Sampah Di Kawasan Wisata Pantai Watu Ulo Kecamatan Ambulu Kabupaten Jember,” Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan UNMUL, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 1, 2022, doi: 10.30872/jtlunmul.v5i2.6747. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Z. Kautzar, Y. Sumantri, and R. Yuniarti, “Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Pada Aktivitas Supply Chain Produk Kulit Menggunakan Metode LCA dan ANP,” Rekayasa, Jurnal Manajemen, dan Sistem Industri, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 200–211, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Indartono, B. A. Kusuma, and A. P. Putra, “Perancangan Sistem Pemantau Kualitas Air Pada Budidaya Ikan Air Tawar,” Journal of Information System Management (JOISM), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 11–17, 2020, doi: 10.24076/joism.2020v1i2.23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Amiri, B. Hadizadeh, M. G. Mooselu, S. Azadi, and A. H. Sayyahzadeh, “Evaluating the water quality index in dam lake for cold water fish farming,” Environmental Challenges, vol. 5, no. November, p. 100378, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Ratnasari and I. S. Asharhani, “Aspek Kualitas Udara, Kenyamanan Termal Dan Ventilasi Sebagai Acuan Adaptasi Hunian Pada Masa Pandemi,” Arsir, p. 24, 2021, doi: 10.32502/arsir.v0i0.3646. [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. Latupapua, “Faktor Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Kunjungan Ulang Ke Daya Tarik Objek Siwang Paradise Kota Ambon,” Jurnal Hutan Pulau-Pulau Kecil, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 175–188, 2021, doi: 10.30598/jhppk.2021.5.2.175. [Google Scholar]
  27. X. Wang, J. Kim, J. Kim, and Y. Koh, “Application of Natural-Resource-Based View to Nature-Based Tourism Destinations,” Sustainability (Switzerland) , vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16062375. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.