Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 212, 2025
1st International Conference on Advanced Research in Sustainable Economic and Social Science (ICARSESS-24)
Article Number 04019
Number of page(s) 10
Section Social Science for Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521204019
Published online 05 March 2025
  1. U. Angga Widy Utomo∗, “Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Power Capacity of Traction Substations on the Needs of the Yogyakarta - Solo Line KRL,” Emit. J. Tek. Electro, doi: 10.23917/emitor.v22i1.14861. [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Paradhiba, “Evaluation of Operational Performance and Passenger Satisfaction Level of the Yogyakarta – Solo KRL,” Fak Thesis. Tech. Civil and Perenc. Univ. Islam Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. J. M. Zefri, “ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF KRL COMMUTER LINE SERVICE AT BEKASI STATION,” pp. 115–124, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Mangkoesubroto, Public Economy. 1995. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Z. Hana, F. Hukum, and U. Eleven, “GOVERNMENT POLICY IN REGULATING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION,” pp. 73–92, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. S. Anom, A. Purba, G. F. Nama, I. P. Lampung, J. Susislo, and B. Lampung, “National Seminar on Engineering (SNIP) Analysis of Public Transportation Service Needs in Bandar Lampung City,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Ramadhani, O. Firdaus, and E. S. Hisyam, “Analysis of Bus Public Transportation Needs in Bangka Regency,” FROPIL (Forum Prof. Tek. Sipil), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 14–28, 2018, doi:10.33019/fropil.v6i1.1262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Hollensen, Marketing Management A Relationship Approach, Second Edition, London: Pearson Education Limited. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. A. C. Del I. Hawkins, Roger J. Best, Consumer Behavior. 1995. [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Anugrah, P. Agnur, H. Z. Rahman, and A. Andreas, “Analysis of Ability To Pay (ATP) and Willingness To Pay (WTP) in Passenger Train Service Users Across Tanjung Karang Station – Kertapati Station,” pp. 128–136. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. C. Laia and S. Nurlaela, “Evaluation of Commuter Line Service Quality Based on Gender Perspective,” J. Tek. ITS, vol. 9, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v9i2.56286. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Karkasa, U. T. Yogyakarta, I. Rate, and C. Line, “ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF KRL COMMUTER LINE ROUTE YOGYAKARTA – SOLO Abul Fida Ismaili,” vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 40–45, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. A. Putri, A. Oktavianto, N. Pamursari, and N. Sari, “Improving Operational Efficiency of the Jogja-Solo Commuter Line through a Schedule Improvement Scheme Using the Geometric Growth Formula,” vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 368–376, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Chindyana, “SOLO-JOGJA ELECTRIC RAIL TRAIN,” vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 131–142, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Sahara, B. Nurcahyo, and A. Nugroho, “The Effectiveness of the Use of the Jabodetabek Commuter Line Electric Train (KRL) to Reduce Congestion in DKI Jakarta,” vol. 10, no. 2, 2023. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.