EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 212 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 212 (2025) 04036 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 212, 2025
1st International Conference on Advanced Research in Sustainable Economic and Social Science (ICARSESS-24)
Article Number 04036
Number of page(s) 11
Section Social Science for Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521204036
Published online 05 March 2025
  1. H. K. Davison and M. J. Burke, “Sex Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: A Meta-analytic Investigation,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 225–248, 2000, doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1711. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Singh and S. Vinnicombe, “The 2002 female FTSE index and women directors,” Women Manag. Rev., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 349–358, 2003, doi: 10.1108/09649420310498975. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. E. Inyang, R. Agnihotri, and L. Munoz, “The role of manager leadership style in salesperson implementation of sales strategy: a contingency perspective,” J. Bus. Ind. Mark., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1074–1086, 2018, doi: 10.1108/JBIM-09-2017-0230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. T. Teye, “An International Perspective on the Human Rights of Women,” J. Hum. Rights Soc. Work, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 253–261, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s41134-023-00253-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. Aycan, “Key success factors for women in management in Turkey,” Appl. Psychol., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 453–477, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00180.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. C. Paustian-Underdahl, L. S. Walker, and D. J. Woehr, “Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 1129–1145, 2014, doi: 10.1037/a0036751. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. E. E. Duehr and J. E. Bono, “Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing?,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 815–846, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00055.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. H. Eagly and L. L. Carli, “The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 807–834, 2003, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. M. A. Sa’ban, L. O. M. Arham, N. Hartawati, and J. A. Pratama, “Building motivation and entrepreneurship spirit in the women farmer group of Bola Village,” Community Empower., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/ce/article/view/10476 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. B. Moran, “Gender differences in leadership,” Libr. Trends, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 475–491, 1992, doi: 10.7172/1733-9758.2016.20.10. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Aminah and G. Juniarto, “Pengaruh Kebutuhan Akan Prestasi, Kebutuhan Afiliasi, Kebutuhan Dominasi dan Kebutuhan Otonomi terhadap Kesuksesan Entrepreneur Wanita di Kota Semarang,” J. Ilm. Din. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 1, no. 2, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Anggadwita and W. Dhewanto, “The influence of personal attitude and social perception on women entrepreneurial intentions in micro and small enterprises in Indonesia,” Int. J. Entrep. Small Bus., vol. 27, no. 2–3, pp. 131–148, 2016, doi: 10.1504/IJESB.2016.073974. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Lewis, Women in Family Business Leadership Roles: Daughters on the Stage, vol. 25, no. 4. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010. doi: 10.1108/17542411011048191. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Z. Stelter, “Gender Differences in Leadership: Current Social Issues and Future Organizational Implications,” J. Leadersh. Stud., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 88–99, 2002, doi: 10.1177/107179190200800408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. L. Bem, The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality, vol. 5, no. 1. Yale University Press, 1994. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0501_16. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. H. Eagly, Sex Differences in Social Behavior. Psychology Press, 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203781906. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. N. Jacklin and E. E. Maccoby, The Psychology of Sex Differences: —Vol. II: Annotated Bibliography, vol. 2. Stanford University Press, 1974. [Online]. Available: http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=2885 [Google Scholar]
  18. A. G. Schmukler, In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Essay review., vol. 5, no. 2. Harvard university press, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Cahill, “Why sex matters for neuroscience,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 477–484, 2006, doi: 10.1038/nrn1909. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. A. Shaywitz et al., “Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language,” Nature, vol. 373, no. 6515, pp. 607–609, 1995, doi: 10.1038/373607a0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Severiens and G. T. m. Ten Dam, Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, vol. 6, no. 4. Psychology press, 1996. doi: 10.1177/0959353596064008. [Google Scholar]
  22. N. D. Kurniasari, “Sex Role, Bias Gender Dan Pekerjaan,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.020%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ann als.2010.10.008%0Ahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=int itle:As+cidades+e+territ?rios+do+conhecimento+na+?ptica+desenvolvimento+e+d o+marketing+territorial# [Google Scholar]
  23. I. D. A. Nurhaeni, “Reformasi Kebijakan Sumberdaya Manusia Adil Gender,” J. Kebijak. dan Manaj. PNS, vol. 6, no. 2 November, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.bkn.go.id/index.php/asn/article/view/94%0Ahttps://jurnal.bkn.go.id/in dex.php/asn/article/download/94/89 [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. S. Lekniyanto, N. A. Budiadi, and ..., “Kepemimpinan Perempuan Pada Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah,” in … Ekonomi Untidar 2021, 2021, pp. 203–214. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/semnasfe2021/article/view/4420%0Ahttps://ju rnal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/semnasfe2021/article/viewFile/4420/2170 [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Z. Situmorang, “Gaya Kepemimpinan Perempuan,” PESAT (Psikologi, Ekon. Satra, Arsit. dan Sipil), vol. 4, no. 2, p. P-129-P-135, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. S. Tsany, A. C. Setiawan, M. Pendidikan, F. I. Pendidikan, and U. N. Surabaya, “Efektivitas Gaya Kepemimpinan ‘ Women Leadership ‘ Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru,” Inspirasi Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 10, no. c, pp. 539–550, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  27. J. A. Zabrina and Roy Setiawan, “Analisis Gaya Kepemimpinan Perempuan Pada Pt. Seni Optima Pratama Surabaya,” Agora, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Carmeli, R. Gelbard, and R. Reiter-Palmon, “Leadership, Creative Problem-Solving Capacity, and Creative Performance: The Importance of Knowledge Sharing,” Hum. Resour. Manage., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 95–121, 2013, doi: 10.1002/hrm.21514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Elrehail, “The relationship among leadership, innovation and knowledge sharing: A guidance for analysis,” Data Br., vol. 19, pp. 128–133, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Xenikou, “Transformational leadership, transactional contingent reward, and organizational identification: The mediating effect of perceived innovation and goal culture orientations,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, no. OCT, p. 1754, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. N. Gwamanda and B. Mahembe, “The influence of ethical leadership and climate on employee work engagement,” SA J. Ind. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 269–296, 2023, doi: 10.4102/sajip.v49i0.2108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. D. T. Yoshida, S. Sendjaya, G. Hirst, and B. Cooper, “Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 1395–1404, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Zhu and F. Zhang, “How does servant leadership fuel employee innovative behavior? A moderated mediation framework,” Asia Pacific J. Hum. Resour., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 356–377, 2020, doi: 10.1111/1744-7941.12227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. N. Jankelová, Z. Joniaková, and J. Mišún, “Innovative Work Behavior—A Key Factor in Business Performance? The Role of Team Cognitive Diversity and Teamwork Climate in This Relationship,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 14, no. 4, p. 185, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jrfm14040185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Q. Wang, H. Hou, and Z. Li, “Participative leadership: a literature review and prospects for future research,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, p. 924357, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. N. A. Gani, R. E. Utama, A. Priharta, and M. Maulianza, “Servant Leadership in Non-Profit,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Manaj. E-ISSN, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 46–51, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  37. O. Janssen, “Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour,” J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 287–302, 2000, doi: 10.1348/096317900167038. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Carmeli, Z. Sheaffer, G. Binyamin, R. Reiter-Palmon, and T. Shimoni, “Transformational leadership and creative problem-solving: The mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity,” J. Creat. Behav., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 115–135, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jocb.43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. J. De Jong and D. Den Hartog, “Measuring innovative work behaviour,” Creat. Innov. Manag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. K. Lanaj and J. R. Hollenbeck, “Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: The role of gender and countervailing biases,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1476–1494, 2015, doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. A. H. Eagly and M. C. Johannesen-Schmidt, “The leadership styles of women and men,” J. Soc. Issues, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 781–797, 2001, doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.